Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abajan

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Per Prax and Joe, deleting this version as the work of a cross-wiki hoaxer. If an actual editor wants to create a good-faith version with proper sourcing, it should not be G4'd. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:53, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abajan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Movie doesn’t seem to satisfy WP:NFILM. A before search did show me this but that is very much insufficient. Celestina007 (talk) 21:02, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:02, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:02, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:02, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:02, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Seems like significant coverage under a different spelling "Abba Jaan". There are 20 critical reviews linked at IMdB [[1]]. (I'm not using IMdB as an actual citation...just linking to other citations (mostly in Persian)). Donaldd23 (talk) 23:23, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with note in article about different spelling. Balle010 (talk) 02:44, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per g5, account is globally locked as a prolific cross-wiki hoaxer. Praxidicae (talk) 13:52, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G5. Maybe we should have an article on this film, but this isn't it. – Joe (talk) 15:05, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.