User talk:Khabat4545

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This is Khabat4545's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Sakez

You added a couple of short citations to that article (perhaps taken from a different article?), but didn't provide the full citations. Could you add them please?

PS, you can also install User:Svick/HarvErrors.js as explained here to be made aware of these issues in the future. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 02:21, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Headbomb: I read those citations from the references I added to the article. but for the full citation I must look for the main book which is not easy and need time. I will add as soon as I find it. Thanks, Khabat4545 (talk) 15:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - articles that mention the archaeology of a place, including its age, need to have sources meeting WP:RS and in this case that means books or papers written by professional archaeologists. For that reason I've had to reword some of your edits or remove them. So far as I can tell, "Sakez" under whatever name seems to be a city that was destroyed from time to time and not continually habitated. I spent too much of my time looking for sources, if you can find some, good luck. The region itself was surely lived for tens, maybe hundreds of thousands of years by homosapiens or our ancestors, not just 7000. Doug Weller talk 11:01, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sardar Pashaei for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sardar Pashaei is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sardar Pashaei until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Persia ☘ 12:10, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 00:18, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]