User talk:Josh janakiraman

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Welcome!

Hello, Josh janakiraman.

Welcome to Wikipedia!

I'm Suneye1, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information:

Introduction to Wikipedia

The five pillars of Wikipedia

Editing tutorial

How to edit a page

Simplified Manual of Style

The basics of Wikicode

How to develop an article

How to create an article

Help pages

What Wikipedia is not

Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:

Do be bold

Do assume good faith

Do be civil

Do cite reliable sources

Do maintain a neutral point of view

Don't spam

Don't infringe copyright

Don't add original research

Don't commit vandalism

Don't get blocked

If you need further help, you can:

Ask a question

or you can:

Get help at the Teahouse

or even:

Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

Sincerely, - SUN EYE 1 18:15, 12 November 2021 (UTC) (Leave me a message)[reply]

November 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kurup (film) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kurup (film) was changed by Josh janakiraman (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.927473 on 2021-11-12T09:57:19+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:57, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Thalaivaa. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Thalaivaa was changed by Josh janakiraman (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.879198 on 2021-11-12T10:10:48+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:10, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Chandramukhi, you may be blocked from editing. My Pants Metal (talk) 14:05, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 22:44, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bhama, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nivedyam. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summary

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Please also do go through this guide on how to edit Hemanthah (talk) 10:13, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 23

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Photographer (film)

added a link pointing to Master

Sarah-Jane Dias

added a link pointing to Series

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning????

Please use edit summary for when editing. Without doing so, your account might get blocked.

Also, you may create your own fan page if changing sources up to yourself. Wikipedia is an open source and will never tolerate such users. Veshboyyy (talk) 07:10, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Veshboyyy you need to be aware about that..being a trisha fan is good for you...but not here to express your wishlists.. And fanism with poor sources...This is wikipedia ...behave honestly ... Josh janakiraman (talk)

Look at your edits...you are warning me for your fan..not as a honest wikipedia editor..think yourself first...what u think is not fair to me and you dont have any right to judge on my contributions...i am honestly doing my part here...please don't disturb me and my talkpage for this silly shitty things...just mind on your things... Wikipedia knows what i have done and doing... Josh janakiraman (talk) 14:41, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

General.

Sorry not sorry, I was keeping it general till you decided to add other actresses name unnecessarily when the grammar just plays the role there. Hope you keep that in mind, loser. 2404:160:8043:7146:50AB:304A:EBEF:2A84 (talk) 14:39, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Atleast have some clarity in your language first...then say what you wanted to say please... Josh janakiraman (talk) 14:51, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paayum Oli Ne Yennaku

Hi! Can you create an article for movie Paayum Oli Ne Yennaku. Cast: Vikram Prabhu, Vani Bhojan. Wessodes (talk) 18:05, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly reply me Wessodes (talk) 18:07, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I am not a page creator maybe someone can help you.. 😔 Josh janakiraman (talk) 18:10, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reply 👍 Wessodes (talk) 18:11, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cast names in film plots

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kali (2016 film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
Please do not add actors names in the plot section of films as this is contrary to WP:FILMPLOT "Do not include actors' names in the plot summary" - Thank you - Aadirulez8 (talk) 19:16, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks for the corrections.. Keep correct me if i do any mistakes in between...i will correct it from my next edits 😊 Josh janakiraman (talk) 19:39, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Meena

I have no involvement in this outside seeing a content dispute and reverting to the last time protection was applied. I implore you to please use the talk page before changing anything in such a large manner. Nate • (chatter) 19:57, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you recently removed content from Meena (actress) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adakiko (talk) 07:40, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help me to contact admins..the page of meena is getting with fake awards content the source doesnot support the award provided Josh janakiraman (talk) 11:06, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please report that IP user in the administrators Noticeboard because of edit warring and not providing edit summaries. —It'sCtrlwiki • talk • 11:12, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —It'sCtrlwiki • talk • 12:56, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you😊 Josh janakiraman (talk) 13:24, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Puzhu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Director.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sorry i will correct it.Thank you 😊 Josh janakiraman (talk) 07:20, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:34, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me ...I have 5000 plus credits to my edits without vandalism and disruptive Editing...please unblock me ...i haven't done any mistakes...since i started...november month 2021... Kindly unblock me..i love wikipedia and i do my sincere job here...i love editing as my passion..please kindly unblock me and support me..hoping for a positive reply ..please help Josh janakiraman (talk) 09:49, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Josh janakiraman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is my new phone and i have using since November..Judge me over my Edits...i haven'tried to make any disruptive editing or vandalism or anything like that.. I have 5000 edits to my credits...help me to unblock me please unblock me and appologizing for any mistakes i have done...consider my request ..please..i wish to become a good editor .i love wikipedia and editing..help me pleaseeee. I want to contribute well..please help me....

Decline reason:

You must be incredibly unlucky with your phones as that's the reason you gave last time. Denied.5 albert square (talk) 01:15, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Another new phone? What a coincidence!-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:18, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What is going here.. The phone which am using now is a second hand set from my friend, which is new to me..using it since November 2021. And pointing my name as a sockpipet of a new user ??? Please help me to unblock my id by considering my edit credits and positive side as an editor ... Josh janakiraman (talk) 15:21, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

5 albert square (talk) 02:19, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]