User talk:158.140.53.34

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Welcome!

Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Jacona (talk) 15:55, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres, as you did to Awaken to the Suffering, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 17:58, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Dead Cross (album). If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Binksternet (talk) 18:02, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, and thank you for lending your time to help improve Wikipedia! If you are interested in continuing to edit, I suggest you make an account to gain a bunch of privileges. Happy editing! Alexeyevitch^(talk) 04:37, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Probably wont. Haha...Theres already people being unjust to me on here with my contributions and I am only visitor.

Well, "lolllllll" isn't a good thing to state in an edit summary, and that edit seemed unconstructive to me. Drmies (talk) 22:43, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hello, I'm NoobThreePointOh. I noticed that you recently removed content from Sockweb without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 20:35, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Irony Is a Dead Scene. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Maxim Masiutin (talk) 01:45, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2024

Hi 158.140.53.34! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of A Thousand Times Repent several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:A Thousand Times Repent, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Wikipedialuva (talk) 09:15, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at A Thousand Times Repent shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Wikipedialuva (talk) 09:18, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Reply to message on talkpage regarding A Thousand Times Repent and edit warring

After your edit summary, I stopped reverting because you clarified why you were making the edits you were (even though they did violate the edit warring/3-revert-rule). I could see why you were removing the edits, as the edits you reverted did cite sources that the Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources had ranked "generally unreliable" (though not being deprecated or blacklisted). It's best to clarify why you do something in every edit summary, not just certain ones. It's also important to remember that even if you are "right", the edit warring/3-revert-rule still applies, and edits should generally not be reverted that exceed this without first discussing the issue on the article's talkpage and coming to a consensus. In general, try to make sure every edit explains why you are making the edit; if an edit does get reverted, reach out to the editor on their talk page or ping them on the article's talk page; and try to avoid reverting more than three times, as this is considered edit warring (even if you are "right"). If you find yourself getting very frustrated when editing (which happens to almost everyone), the essay "Wikipedia:Staying cool when the editing gets hot" can be helpful. Thanks! Wikipedialuva (talk) 10:30, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Rahio1234_reported_by_User:AlphaBetaGamma_(Result:_). Thank you. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 11:25, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 16:33, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

May 2024

Hello, I'm Lynch44. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Lynch44 (talk) 21:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Mars (rapper), even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Rahio 1234 08:31, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Skillet (band). Binksternet (talk) 03:33, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.