Jump to content

Talk:Saturn Bomberman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Untitled

Did anyone ever play this game with 10 players? --Abdull 21:31, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, on a projector. It works perfectly. It is pretty cool, but I'm not sure I'd want to do it on anything but a giant TV/a projector. 87.56.8.96 15:17, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great Game

Ive played it in japanese before the game is great (Even though it took a while to recognize the writing.) -darkmewham (nonmember)

Uknown character

Who is Miss Honey? --Abdull 23:37, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Honey seems to be the mascot of Hudson's Hyper Fun Club as you can see on this scan: [1]. Unfortunately the website http://honey.hudson.co.jp seems to be defunct. --Abdull 12:45, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dinosaurs..... or Louies?

What the question above says. Usually the in-game creatures are known as Louies, is this game any different? Overlord11001001 18:11, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Saturn Bomberman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:12, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

Namcokid47 may have a point about the negative side being overemphasized, but "The game was acclaimed for its enjoyable gameplay and multiplayer, though some felt it didn't advance the series as much as earlier installments." is self-contradicting, since "acclaimed" is traditionally used to mean "uniformly praised". Also, the second half of the sentence is simply incorrect. Critics (even the ones who positively reviewed the game) weren't saying "Saturn Bomberman has so many innovative and game-changing advances for the series, but not as many as previous installments."; they were saying that previous installments did almost nothing to change up the formula and Saturn Bomberman is no different in that regard.--Martin IIIa (talk) 15:07, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

...Also, deleting all specific identification of those publications which reviewed the game positively while retaining specific identification of those which reviewed it negatively is rather suspect, an apparent attempt to conceal the fact that the game's "acclaim" is sourced only to a bare majority of 3 out of 5, with 2 of those 3 being relatively obscure platform-specific magazines.--Martin IIIa (talk) 15:23, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reflecting on this further, Namcokid47's repeated emphasizing of the review scores rather than the actual reviews makes me suspect part of the problem here is the massive number of scores listed in the review table with no corresponding prose. We're not supposed to have those anyway, as specified at the very top of the review table's documentation (like an air bag, the reviews table is intended to supplement prose summarizing the critical response, not replace it), and at present the huge reviews table so dwarfs the prose that it's no wonder that Namcokid looked at the review content as less than an afterthought. So, I'm removing the unattached review scores. If anyone fancies taking the time to summarize the reviews into prose, I'm listing the citations here:

  • Jones, Frederick Lewis Jr. "Saturn Bomberman". Allgame. Archived from the original on 10 December 2014.
  • "Legacy Review Archives". Game Informer. Retrieved 3 October 2021.
  • GameFan, volume 4, issue 10, page 19
  • "Saturn Bomberman Review". Game Revolution. Archived from the original on 1998-06-13. Retrieved 4 October 2021.
  • "Saturn Bomberman Review". Game Revolution. June 6, 2004. Retrieved 4 October 2021.
  • GamesMaster, issue 56, page 61
  • Toose, Dan (May 1997). "Saturn Bomberman". Hyper. No. 43. pp. 42–43.
  • Player One, issue 75, pages 86-89

--Martin IIIa (talk) 16:17, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Saturn_Bomberman&oldid=1200234945"