Jump to content

Talk:Malvern Hills

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

. -User:ajmyatt 01:30, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Question

Can anyone suggest a better way of saying "The quarries, especially North Quarry and Tank Quarry are a favourite place for local teenagers to be rescued from.", or should the line just be removed?

Geology(expansion needed)

The geology of the Malvern Hills is complex enough for the article to have its own section on the composition of the rocks, and a cutaway diagramme of the strata. These are some of the oldest hills in the country and this information is therefore important. maybe somebody can help by creating this section. Some useful background information is available here: Malvern Hills Geology. --Kudpung (talk) 03:32, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Have expanded it slightly but much remains to be added. Geopersona (talk) 21:39, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Very good ideas. Here's the probable order of importance. I'll chip in too whren I can.
Moved to ToDo list--Kudpung (talk) 23:54, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Resources

The following could be useful for expanding and referencing the article:

  • Bikett, Percival (1882) Malvern Hills (information compiled from documents dating from 1128)
  • MHC is composed of: "Two persons to be nominated by the council of the county of Worcestershire; Two persons to be nominated by the council of the district of Herefordshire; Eight persons to be nominated from and by the council of the district of Malvern Hills;" http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si1996/Uksi_19961867_en_4.htm Statutory Instrument 1996 No. 1867 The Hereford and Worcester (Structural, Boundary and Electoral Changes) Order 1996
  • Area of Great Landscape Value, the Hills immediately east are designated as a Site of Special Scientific Interest and the area is also designated as Historic Park and Garden.
  • The 1995 Malvern Hills Act. cafe burned down in 1985 (golly, that was 25 yrs. ago already!)
  • Garrard, Rose (2008)DONKEYS YEARS ON THE MALVERN HILLS : “By the time the little village of Great Malvern was made a town in 1851, there were as many donkeys as human residents.”  Beacon Books
  • Significant changes occurred after the outbreak of WW2, as the town was chosen as a refuge for government departments, and an RAF base was set up. Evacuees from the south arrived, as did troops for quartering and refugees from Belgium. With the arrival of US forces, the town population swelled to 30000 and five army hospitals were built on the town’s fringes. The two existing government Research establishments, founded around WW1, were united in 1953 as the Radar Research Establishment and this remains a defence installation to this day. --http://www.docstoc.com/docs/2203319/A-brief-history-of-Malvern-England
  • TheMalvern Hills receive over one million visits a year Malvern Hills Conservators web site: http://www.malvernhills.org.uk Minutes: MALVERN HILLS CONSERVATORS ANNUAL MEETING OF THE BOARD 12 November 2009 7 pm Priory Lodge Hall Avenue Road Malvern 9.4.3.1 (Ammual mtg 121109 for web site.doc Malvern Hills Conservators web site: http://www.malvernhills.org.uk

--Kudpung (talk) 05:00, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Does "Hollybush Hill" exist?

The list of hills (which seems to be take from http://www.ephotozine.com/photolocations/malvern-hills-488 without giving them a citation) includes "Hollybush Hill" between Midsummer Hill and Raggedstone Hill. This appears to be a misreading of the map at http://www.malvernhills.org.uk/Content/Malverns_PocketGuide_web.pdf which includes the village of Hollybush (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollybush,_Worcestershire) and a few other passes in what is otherwise a list of hills. After several hours of research, I can't find any evidence of there being a hill of the same name.

The source of the confusion may well be http://www.malvernhillsaonb.org.uk/documents/L02-2135-02B.pdf - note that this includes "Tinkers Hill 700ft (213m)" which isn't on the Wiki, and perhaps should be? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.24.30.53 (talk) 12:59, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hollybush Hill lies below and to the east of Midsummer Hill.

Hollybush Hill on MAGIC Multi Agency Geographic Information for the Countryside Mhygelle (talk) 08:47, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've added Tinkers Hill to the list of individual hills. Mhygelle (talk) 19:17, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vistas

I am considering nominating this article to be rated as a Good article in the new year. Does the Vistas section go into too much detail to satisfy Good article criteria? Mhygelle (talk) 10:35, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • The section is perhaps overly detailed but not easily reduced. However, the information is not really of the nature that would constitute a complete article on its own. Despite this, of these two choices, the latter would probably be the appraoch I would suggest. Split off the tables into a stand alone piece and reference the "main article" in the section but keep the overview. Saffron Blaze (talk) 11:26, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think the section is fine within the article, although it could be greatly improved by adding coordinates for each vista point. The same comment about coordinates is also true for the list of hills too. When that is done, adding the {{kml}} template to the article will allow all the hills and vista points to be viewed on a single clickable/zoomable map. That sort of thing adds real value to Wikipedia articles (IMHO). --Bob Re-born (talk) 11:56, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Malvern Hills. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:38, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Malvern Hills. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:42, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Malvern Hills. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:59, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Malvern Hills. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:36, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:36, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Malvern_Hills&oldid=1208748977"