Talk:Einsteinium/GA1

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: FRE YWA 02:24, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is my first review...I have no idea of what to expect. But still, you can leave comments and I will address them. Check out my peer review as well. Good luck, editors. FRE YWA 02:24, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Ready to review.

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:
Done
You have some specifics in mind? Nergaal (talk) 02:53, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Done
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:
90 sources. Real good.

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
One per paragraph - even better then the rule of thumb (one per section).

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
Per the guidelines, this has everything.

B. Focused:

Again, some specifics would be helpful. Nergaal (talk) 02:53, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
The 4th criterion is equivalent to not looking like anything. And this article does.
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Obviously.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
With something dealing with US confidential, there is no question on the pictures.

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Specifically, for section 1A, in the section on organomettalic compounds it says, "So experiments, have been performed..." and the comma there is something I want you to fix. For section 3B the section on the synthesis in nuclear explosions is a wall and looks intimidating. FRE YWA 08:09, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Worked a bit on both. Nergaal (talk) 17:02, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hold it - where is the a parameter for EsOCl (look at Chemical compounds → Halides → the last paragraph)? The prose is really good. Remove that "a = " and I will list einsteinium as a good article soon. I have to remove the a parameter myself. Then it will be a good article. FRE YWA 08:13, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]