Jump to content

Single European Railway Directive 2012

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The Single European Railway Directive 2012 (2012/34/EU) is an EU Directive that regulates railway networks in European Union law. This recast the First Railway Directive" and consolidates legislation from each of the first to the fourth "Package" from 1991 to 2016,[1] and allows open access operations on railway lines by companies other than those that own the rail infrastructure. The legislation was extended by further directives to include cross border transit of freight.

In September 2010, the process of merging the directives into a single piece of legislation was begun, with the addition of modifications to strengthen the regulatory framework.[2] The Second Railway Package, the Third Railway Package, and the Fourth Railway Package aim to push integration further.

Background

In many countries in Europe, the railway systems developed as separate privately owned companies operating regional networks[note 1] with permission to construct and operate a line being granted or instructed by government legislation, or by royal decree or license. During the 20th century the railways became organised and run through a countrywide organisation[note 2] often through nationalisation. These entities, in general, had total or virtual monopolies.[note 3]

These national companies were vertically integrated organisations and it was difficult or impossible for private or regional enterprises to run their own trains on the national networks, or to compete in other EU countries' railway systems. Thus in 1991 EU Directive 91/440 was created to make it a legal requirement for independent companies to be able to apply for non-discriminatory track access (running powers) on a European Union country's track.[3]

Description

The aims of the directive are to create a more efficient rail network by creating greater competition. To achieve this aim member states are required to ensure that organisations operating the infrastructure (track, signalling etc.), and those operating services (trains) are separate and run on a commercial basis.[note 4] Additionally railway companies from all member states are allowed to run services on any other member states rail infrastructure, both for passenger transport and goods. The free competition provided by the mandate is optional for regional and urban passenger trains.[4]

Further related legislation exists which applies to railway operations that are covered by directive 91/440:

Cross border freight in the EU

The directive was further clarified and extended by EU directive 2001/12 which initially allowed cross border freight operations on a network of tracks – to be called the Trans European Rail Freight Network[note 5] a network which includes ports and freight terminals.[note 6] The network on which traffic was allowed was to be extended to the whole European network. As a consequence of this new trans-national freight network an additional change was made to the original legislation which required train safety and operating standards[note 7] to be set out clearly and administered by an organisation that did not run commercial services. The directive also required separate accounting of freight and passenger service revenues and costs.[5]

Track allocation and access charges in the EU

EU directive 2001/14 set out the framework for the construction of bodies that control and regulate the allocation of line possessions to companies, and the charges for using the track,[6] this directive replaced the previous legislation EU directive 95/19.[7]

Licensing of railway companies in the EU

EU Directive 95/18[8] set out a framework and guidelines for the way in which countries of the EU provide licenses to operate to railway companies; a license provided in one member state is generally valid in all other member states.[note 8] The directive was further clarified by EU Directive 2001/13 in 2001.[9]

EU Directive 2004/51

EU Directive 2004/51 (part of the Second Railway Package) amended directive 91/440 to include reference to the Trans European Rail Freight Network, and future access by 2007 by licensed rail freight operators of all the European rail network as originally described in directive 2001/12.[10]

Contents

The following summarises the Directive's contents:

  • art 1, management of infrastructure and rail, licensing, access charges
  • art 2, not for urban or regional services
  • art 3, definitions
  • art 4, Independence of railway undertakings and infrastructure managers
  • art 5, Management of the railway undertakings according to commercial principles
  • art 6, separate accounts
  • art 7, independence of essential functions of an infrastructure manager
  • art 8, financing infrastructure, 5-year strategies, state funding
  • art 9(1) bailouts: 'Without prejudice to Union rules on State aid and in accordance with Articles 93, 107 and 108 TFEU, Member States shall set up appropriate mechanisms to help reduce the indebtedness of publicly owned or controlled railway undertakings to a level which does not impede sound financial management and which improves their financial situation.'
  • art 10, Conditions of access to railway infrastructure (1) 'Railway undertakings shall be granted, under equitable, non-discriminatory and transparent conditions, the right to access to the railway infrastructure in all Member States for the purpose of operating all types of rail freight services.' (2) and passengers
  • art 11, limits on access rights
  • art 12, levy on railway undertakings doing passenger services
  • art 13(1) 'Infrastructure managers shall supply to all railway undertakings, in a non-discriminatory manner, the minimum access package laid down in point 1 of Annex II.'
  • arts 14–15, cross border agreements, Commission monitoring
  • art 16, licensing authority in each member state
  • art 17–22, licensing requirements
  • arts 23–25, license validity and procedure
  • arts 26–37, infrastructure access charging
  • arts 55–57, each MS should have a single regulator for rail, functions and cooperation
  • art 58, Procurement Directive 2004/17/EC
  • arts 59–67, final
  • Annex I, list of infrastructure items
  • Annex II, in access, services to be supplied to railway undertakings
  • Annex VI, requirements for costs and charges for access

Significance

Though the original directive was seen by some as a law bringing about privatisation of the railways,[11] there are no requirements in the legislation requiring any level of privatisation. The main aim of the process was the "de-monopolisation" of European railways, with the aim of increasing competitiveness,[12] a process referred to as 'liberalisation'.

There has also been a large increase in the number of private freight providers, many relatively small such as Rail4chem and ERS Railways, but the national companies still control the majority of the traffic. Deutsche Bahn has expanded considerably in the rail freight market, with the purchase of the freight section of the Dutch railway company NS (now DB Schenker Rail Nederland), EWS (UK), and DSB goods (Denmark) amongst others. The French state rail company SNCF also expanded through acquisitions, raising the possibility of trans-national virtual monopolies on rail freight replacing former national monopolies,[13] or a potential duopoly between SNCF and Deutsche Bahn in most of western Europe.[14][15]

A subsidiary of the British company DB Schenker Rail (UK), EuroCargoRail, operates trains in France and Spain, a situation unlikely prior to the liberalisation.

The increase in cross-border traffic has fuelled demand for multiple voltage electric locomotives such as Bombardier's TRAXX, Siemens's Eurosprinter and electric versions of Alstom's Prima locomotives series.

In passenger transport, large transport corporations have been created, or expanded into the rail market from other related activities such as FirstGroup, Veolia, Serco and Arriva.

In the UK, the directives have been criticised in some areas[16] partly based on the problems with the full privatisation of British Rail, additionally the regulations favour competitive practice which are not necessarily compatible with workers rights.[17]

Implementation

In the years following the introduction of the mandates different countries implemented them to different extents and at different paces. By 2004, some countries such as the United Kingdom had gone far beyond the original remit privatising the railway system on Great Britain (but not Northern Ireland), others such as Finland and France had created fully separate infrastructure and railway companies from the state-run enterprises; still others, such as Germany, had created separate subsidiaries for different service providers and subsidiaries for infrastructure and track (DB Netz). Yet others merely separated accounting between the two organisational sections.[18] Most countries in the EU still have a state-owned infrastructure company, but many have privatised part or all of their service providers, or are working towards privatisation.

In June 2010, the European Commission instigated legal proceedings through the European Court of Justice against 13 states that had not fully implemented the set of directives (known as the 'first railway package'). The countries not having fully implemented the legislation to the commission's satisfaction were Austria, Czech Republic, Germany, Greece, France, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia and Spain.[19][20] In 2012 action against Germany and Austria on the basis that their infrastructure and operating companies were insufficiently separate was rejected by the European Court of Justice. Portugal, Spain and Hungary remained as having not yet fully complied with the aspects of the directives.[21] Legal action against Bulgaria was passed to the Court of Justice in 2012 for non-implementation.[22] In February 2013 the European Court of Justice ruled that the governments of Hungary and Spain had failed to liberalise their railways; infrastructure management was not sufficiently separated from train operation.[23]

Ireland derogated its obligation to implement the legislation; until 2012 Iarnród Éireann train operations and infrastructure businesses remained unsplit, and a similar situation existed in Northern Ireland.[24]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ For example in the United Kingdom, France, Ireland, Germany.
  2. ^ For example: British Railways created in 1948; SNCF 1938; Deutsche Reichsbahn created through the merger of individual German state railways in 1920; RENFE and FEVE in Spain, during the Franco government
  3. ^ Specifically in terms of mainline workings, small industrial railways continued to exist in large industrial complexes such as mines and steelworks.
  4. ^ The legal consequence of this is that companies providing track access and those providing trains are separate, both in terms of management and accounting. ie separate companies
  5. ^ Directive 2001/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Annex 1, See: maps of the Trans European Rail Freight Network (TERFN) pages 9–25,[5] also see directive 2001/12/EC section 12, Article 10a;[5]
  6. ^ Directive 2001/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Annex 1, See: list of ports in the TERFN, page 8[5]
  7. ^ Such standards can be referred to as "Technical Specifications for Interoperability" (TSI) and are set in the EU by the European Railway Agency e.g. see: Technical Specifications for Interoperability (TSI) Archived 23 December 2009 at the Wayback Machine www.era.europa.eu
  8. ^ Provided that the original license was issued for operations in other countries; a change of operating circumstances requires a re-evaluation, or re-application for a license.

References

  1. ^ 91/440/EC "European Union legislation". rail-reg.gov.uk. Office of Rail Regulation (UK). First Railway Package.. Subsequent directives included 2001/12/EC, 2001/13/EC and 2001/14/EC.
  2. ^ "Proposals for revision of First Railway Package published". 20 September 2010.
  3. ^ Development of the Community's railways europa.eu
  4. ^ Council Directive 91/440/EEC of 29 July 1991 on the development of the Community's railways eur-lex.europa.eu
  5. ^ a b c d Directive 2001/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council 26 February 2001 amendment to directive 91/440/EEC eur-lex.europa.eu
  6. ^ Directive 2001/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2001 on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure and safety certification eur-lex.europa.eu
  7. ^ Council Directive 95/19/EC of 19 June 1995 on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the charging of infrastructure fees eur-lex.europa.eu
  8. ^ Council Directive 95/18/EC of 19 June 1995 on the licensing of railway undertakings eur-lex.europa.eu
  9. ^ Directive 2001/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council 26 February 2001 amendment to directive 95/18/EC eur-lex.europa
  10. ^ Corrigendum to Directive 2004/51/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 amending Council Directive 91/440/EEC on the development of the Community’s railways eur-lex.europa.eu
  11. ^ A Proud British Tradition gets Shunted Off the Rails Archived 8 November 2009 at the Wayback Machine www.sovereignty.org.uk
  12. ^ Liberalization of railway transport : European directives on railway transport and Access to infrastructure Archived 2 February 2010 at the Wayback Machine Author: Enrico Mordiglia www.mordiglia.it
  13. ^ Railway Mergers and Railway Alliances: Competition Issues[permanent dead link‍] Author:Russell Pittman, Conference on Emerging Competition Issues in Regulated Network Industries: Alliances, consortia and other quasi-mergers, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 25–26 September 2008 164.15.69.62
  14. ^ Rail freight duopoly would be bad news for industry Damian Brett , 25 February 2010 , www.ifw-net.com
  15. ^ Rail Freight Group (opinion) "Stop the creeping European duopoly!" , Page 5 , 12/2009 , www.rfg.org.uk (www.railfreightgroup.com)
  16. ^ Brussels and rail 'liberalisation' Archived 20 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Centre for Social Europe 12/2005 www.rmtbristol
  17. ^ The European Union, railway privatisation and the attack on workers' living standards Authors: Anna Rombach, Françoise Thull, 8 November 2007
  18. ^ Towards a single European railway market? The slow process of implementing European railway standards Archived 26 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Authors:Jan-Coen van Elburg, Torben Holvad, Publication : Association of European Transport, 2004, www.etcproceedings.org
  19. ^ Rail services: Commission initiates proceedings against 13 Member States which have not fully implemented the first railway package Reference: IP/10/807 , 24 June 2010 , Brussels , europa.eu
  20. ^ EC stepping up pressure 28 July 2010 , www.railwaygazette.com
  21. ^ "Directive 91/440 does not require institutional separation", railwaygazette.com, 7 September 2012
  22. ^ "Commission takes legal action against Bulgaria for failing to fully implement the first railway package", europa.eu, European Union, 26 January 2012
  23. ^ "European Court of Justice rules on vertical separation". Railway Gazette International. Retrieved 3 March 2013.
  24. ^ "Irish government looks at rail restructuring as derogation ends", railwaygazette.com, Railway Gazette International, 14 March 2012, archived from the original on 20 January 2018, retrieved 15 March 2012
  25. ^ Guihéry, Laurent (June 2022). "Trenitalia's arrival on the Paris-Lyon high-speed line: from open competition to underground cooperation with SNCF?". 20th European Transport Congress. University of Győr. Retrieved 16 March 2024.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Single_European_Railway_Directive_2012&oldid=1244496793"