Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Equal Paying for Equal Working

Equal Paying for Equal Working

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Equal Paying for Equal Working (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I would propose merging to Equal pay for equal work but there's not much to merge here. Duplicates an already existing article. Chess (talk) Ping when replying 06:39, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Chess (talk) Ping when replying 06:39, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Chess (talk) Ping when replying 06:39, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Chess (talk) Ping when replying 06:39, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

• Speedy delete Failure to Help:Your first article#Search for an existing article, odd grammar not worth a redirect. Reywas92^Talk 09:12, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• I think that, while worded awkwardly, this would work as a reasonable redirect over to the aforementioned other page. The contents of this article as of now appear, as stated above, to be simply a rehash. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 10:56, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• Delete per nom without redirecting. Stop gerund misuse, or is that stop gerund misusing? Clarityfiend (talk) 22:36, 15 April 2020 (UTC)