Talk:Bell UH-1Y Venom
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bell UH-1Y Venom article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
Aviation: Rotorcraft C‑class | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Military history: Aviation / North America / United States C‑class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Payload Improvements
In the development section the article lists a 125% increase in payload over the UH-1N but in the design section it lists the same stat but with 170% increase. Which is it? -Noha307 (talk) 19:48, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- Bell sources list the 125% on the UH-1Y page and 170% in the pocket guide. Maybe 125% was the minimum goal for the project. Anyway, I combined the text and listed the lower 125%. -fnlayson (talk) 20:29, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- According to Wikipedia, payload increased from 4,500 lbs. to 6,660 lbs. -- a 48% increase (note non-fan-boy arithmetic). Percent is hard, huh? The links are dead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.53.21.210 (talk) 19:14, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Or you're using the wrong figures. - BilCat (talk) 22:43, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Per the article, "Over the years new avionics and radios, in addition to modern door guns and safety upgrades, have greatly increased the UH-1N's empty weight. With a maximum speed of approximately 100 knots (190 km/h) and an inability to lift much more than its own crew, fuel and ammunition, the UH-1N, while useful, is limited in its utility." So obviously the empty weight in service had increased over the listed empty weight. So no, it's not "fan-boy arithmetic". This is why WP doesn't accept original research, but reports what the sources state. Granted, company information has to be taken with a grain of salt, as they are trying promote the new aircraft, but it's reasonable in this case to assume they're right. - BilCat (talk) 22:56, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- The 6,660 lb/4,500 lb ratio is 1.48 or 148%, which falls within the 125% to 170% listed above. -Fnlayson (talk) 22:59, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, arithmetic is hard. You don't understand the difference between "percent increase" and "percent of." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.53.21.210 (talk) 15:46, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- Whatever. I listed a ratio, the latter. The UH-1N's useful load above may not be right. But if it is then the UH-1Y sources have stated a ratio instead of a percent increase (25% or 70% increase). -Fnlayson (talk) 18:36, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- This article certainly lives down to Wikipedia quality standards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.53.21.210 (talk) 18:01, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Number of vehicles in service
The article states that 31 are in service, but that was in back in 2010. Can anyone update that statistic? Coolgeek96 (talk) 23:49, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Just updated to 54 in use from Aviation Week's 2014 source book. -Fnlayson (talk) 00:19, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Can someone with adequate sources please update again? Nearly 6 years passed since this. Thanks, DPdH (talk) 19:46, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
- Did you check the article? The numbers in service is not listed in the article; probably removed by another editor that thinks that info is fluff or something. -Fnlayson (talk) 20:18, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Bell UH-1Y Venom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090206153717/http://www.news.navy.mil/search/displaybbs.asp?bbs_id=1332&cat=5 to http://www.news.navy.mil/search/displaybbs.asp?bbs_id=1332&cat=5
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.bellhelicopter.com/en/support/pdf/rb/rb_oct18.pdf - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081028131414/http://www.bellhelicopter.com/en/company/pressReleases/PR_08_0305_threeH-1Delivered.cfm to http://www.bellhelicopter.com/en/company/pressReleases/PR_08_0305_threeH-1Delivered.cfm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_generic.jsp?channel=aerospacedaily&id=news%2FUH1Y081808.xml&headline=Marine%20Corps%20Declares%20UH-1Y%20Operational
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110728013109/http://www.navair.navy.mil/nawcwd/nawcwd/news/2006/2006-03_ah1z_testing.htm to http://www.navair.navy.mil/nawcwd/nawcwd/news/2006/2006-03_ah1z_testing.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://pao.navair.navy.mil/press_releases/index.cfm?fuseaction=home.view&Press_release_id=3485&site_id=17
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070624103148/http://acquisition.navy.mil/programs/air/uh_1y to http://acquisition.navy.mil/programs/air/uh_1y
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:30, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bell UH-1Y Venom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20100407151522/http://www.history.navy.mil/branches/nhcorg5.htm to http://www.history.navy.mil/branches/nhcorg5.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:17, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
- C-Class aviation articles
- C-Class rotorcraft articles
- Rotorcraft task force articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- C-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- C-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles