Jump to content

User talk:88.217.152.166

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 88.217.152.166 (talk) at 11:21, 17 November 2019. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

A quick procedural reminder

When you blank a notice from your user talk page, the community deems that as acknowledgment of the notice. In other words, do not think that just by blanking the edit-warring notice you can evade scrutiny for your edits.

IMO, the logic for your edits appears sound. What you should probably do is discuss the edits at the articles' talk pages and convince other editors that removing the information does help the articles. —C.Fred (talk) 15:26, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am fully aware of that; I do not appreciate being accused of trying to evade scrutiny. And I asked the editor three times to explain their objection to my edit. They have not done so. 88.217.152.166 (talk) 15:30, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Based on your familiarity with policy, it sounds like you've been around long enough to know that there are IPs who do think that blanking their talk page makes it look like they never got a warning. That's the caution I was trying to communicate, not necessary to accuse. I'm sure you aware that it's hard to be sure who the person behind an IP is, so even though we assume good faith, sometimes we brace for the worst. —C.Fred (talk) 15:37, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have never seen anyone blank their page in an attempt to pretend they were never warned. The existence of page histories obviously means that could never work if anyone were to try it. 88.217.152.166 (talk) 18:26, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Sleeve gastrectomy

Hello 88.217.152.166. You and the other party are both warned per the outcome of the complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. You are risking a block if you revert the article again without getting a prior consensus for your change on the article talk page. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:27, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

88.217.152.166 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have been blocked without warning for no apparent reason. I have not done anything that warrants being blocked. 88.217.152.166 (talk) 11:21, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I have been blocked without warning for no apparent reason. I have not done anything that warrants being blocked. [[Special:Contributions/88.217.152.166|88.217.152.166]] ([[User talk:88.217.152.166#top|talk]]) 11:21, 17 November 2019 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have been blocked without warning for no apparent reason. I have not done anything that warrants being blocked. [[Special:Contributions/88.217.152.166|88.217.152.166]] ([[User talk:88.217.152.166#top|talk]]) 11:21, 17 November 2019 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have been blocked without warning for no apparent reason. I have not done anything that warrants being blocked. [[Special:Contributions/88.217.152.166|88.217.152.166]] ([[User talk:88.217.152.166#top|talk]]) 11:21, 17 November 2019 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}