Jump to content

Talk:Criticisms of globalization

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Moonyprong01 (talk | contribs) at 07:57, 16 March 2019 (→This page is a mess: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

New page

I have started this page as this topic does not seem to be dealt with in any other place.--Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:26, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some great stats "WTO Trade Statistics Questioning the Benefits of Globalization". --Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:43, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Criticisms of socialism which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. Marcus Qwertyus 21:38, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Criticisms of globalization. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:23, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

additional evaluations to article

Under the [1] heading, it only discusses the example of globalization in Africa, so it should include more examples of other countries negatively effected by the limitations of growth of globalization.

Under the [2] has a run on sentence in the second paragraph. Jcrobinsonberkeley (talk) 20:57, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Limitations of Growth"
  2. ^ "Power of transnational corporation"

Anti-Western Bias

I'm not denying the negative effects of globalization in forcing western culture on other nations, however its not like globalization is great for western countries either; if anything they are just as hurt by it, just in different ways.

The article literally only discusses globalization in an anti-western lens and hence appears incomplete and very biased. 209.171.88.84 (talk) 03:04, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unwarranted assertions

The intro says "globalization is a set-in-stone "program" that is difficult to implement without political unrest." Where's the evidence for that? What is "a set-in-stone "program"" supposed to mean? It implies that something or someone or some group is running this "program", but where is the evidence for that? And it also implies that some entity or group is conspiring to deliberately plan this, but there is no evidence for this, unless you think this is the secret purpose of the Bilderberg Group for example. Similarly, "Globalization can be partly responsible for the current global economic crisis". What global economic crisis? The global standard of living is increasing, and inequality is decreasing. While some people in western economies may very understandably resent their jobs being moved to the third world, for the locals there it is a greater benefit. Better to have the choice between one not very good job and no job, or between one not very good job and an even worse job, than no choice. It is unreasonable to condemn people in the third world to short lives of poverty. 92.3.77.16 (talk) 10:44, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lacking sources, and language is not neutral

The introductory paragraph is just a mess overall. Almost nothing is sourced and the language is definitely biased. Dokterclaw (talk) 16:36, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This page is a mess

Not only is the lead terrible but the actual sections contain very little citations and border on conspiracies. Moonyprong01 (talk) 07:57, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Criticisms_of_globalization&oldid=888003468"