Jump to content

Talk:Baylor University sexual assault scandal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 96.42.57.184 (talk) at 20:34, 28 November 2016 (Single sourced 1 paragraph page). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Single sourced 1 paragraph page

This doesn't seem to fit the Wikipedia definition of a full article. Suggest merging it with Baylor Bears Football page or expanding it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.42.57.184 (talk) 00:52, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a full article, hence the stub tag. I am working on much more content and am currently assembling what is a very eventful timeline of the events. As it is a timeline, I do not want to post until I have finished because, being incomplete, it would be misleading. This is a notable subject with extensive and ongoing news coverage and qualifies for its own article. −Wordbuilder (talk) 19:57, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok.

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://sportsday.dallasnews.com/college-sports/baylorbears/2016/10/20/baylor-sexual-assault-scandal-timeline-football-convictions-title-ix-investigation. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:02, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unwarranted deletions

IP User 129.62.125.9 has twice deleted (1, 2) the Timeline section from the article. On the second deletion, the user said, in part, that the section was "stolen from reddit threads," and linked to this. I ran an Earwig's Copyvio Detector to compare the article to the specified post on Reddit. Its results indicated that copying was unlikely (2.0% confidence) with only 2 overlapping phrases for a total of about 7 words, so the accusation is clearly unfounded. As both the section and the Reddit post cover the same material, the basic facts should match if both are accurate, but there is no infringement and the section, which has over 80 citations, should remain in the article. →Wordbuilder (talk) 05:25, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]