First, please do not add "Team:" in the columns of the name cuz if someone view, they can already known through the columns of event (e.x - Men's SINGLEs, Women's DOUBLEs, Women's TEAMs, Men's INDIVIDUALs)
Second, please do not add a year (2015) in the columns of the date cuz a crowd is already known that 28th SEA Games Singapore is in 2015!!!
Please! Do not make a stupidity changes ANYMORE !!
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Template:2016 AFC U-23 Championship qualification (2nd place), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Uishaki (talk) 15:58, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for March 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Equestrian at the 2015 Southeast Asian Games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Equestrian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Squash at the 2015 Southeast Asian Games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Squash (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
An article should never be left with a non-existent (redlinked) category on it. Either the category should be created, or else the link should be removed or changed to a category that does exist.
That is why I removed it. They should be created before or shortly after they are put in the article.Peter Rehse (talk) 21:06, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Which image? I didn't put any image on the article you mentioned. Again, you returning to repeat the same thing that I just said for. Who revert first? It's you based from the history log! ~ Muffin Wizard;)11:43, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, even I'm not so understand your broken English. But please respect other editors. You should know how to differentiate the behaviour of every users who edit the articles, even there is some irresponsible users making vandalism and spamming. We should remember there is a good user too who are trying to improve the articles. ~ Muffin Wizard;)11:56, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Howard the Duck. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Basketball at the 2015 Southeast Asian Games – Men's tournament without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. If you want to delete the article, please use the WP:PROD or WP:AFD process. –HTD17:47, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your contributions to women's football/soccer articles. I thought I'd let you know about the Women's Football/Soccer Task Force (WP:WOSO), a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women's football/soccer. If you would like to participate, join by visiting the Members page. Thanks!
Please add your name here: [2] by going to the end of the list and entering your signature on the next line. Thank you for your great contributions! Hmlarson (talk) 03:30, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ways to improve Vietnam at the 2015 Southeast Asian Games
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Not sure this article qualifies as distinctly notable enough for inclusion here.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Ormr2014 (talk) 03:29, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It appears to me that you have a habit of simply reverting every edit you do not like in the SEAG articles without giving sufficient reason for doing so. If this persists further, I will be forced to bring this issue up for conflict resolution.
If I may repeat the reasons I have already stated for the changes:
The order of the articles are as per the standards used in the Olympics-related articles. And it makes logical sense. Why place the participating countries at the end of the article, when they should logically come first based on chronological order?
The Football article cannot possibly be devoid of sub-articles without causing the main article to become excessively long as the tournament progresses. I have already created the subarticles and templates to support this move, so kindly do not revert without checking what you are reverting.
If you disagree, have the basic courtesy to discuss here instead of just clicking the revert button too frequently. Thank you.--Huaiwei (talk) 14:25, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry, but I cannot fully comprehend your usage of the English language. But if I may gently remind: Who set the "rules" that there is no need for sub-articles? Can you show me any rule or regulation in Wikipedia which supports your claim? There is, however, a guideline to avoid excessively long articles, not in terms of what you can see on the page, but the amount of codes needed to create it. And this is the very reason why templates are used to reduce the article length. Please kindly read the Wikipedia:Manual of Style before attempting to force your preferences across pages and mindlessly reverting edits as a means of getting your way without explaining your intentions. Thank you.--Huaiwei (talk) 16:59, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Huaiwei. I talk you can view the article true? You have selected the correct page in here?
(talk page stalker)@Boyconga278:, "Synchronized" is an American spelling, while "Synchronised" is a British spelling. The same thing also applied to other words like "recognized (American) → recognised (British)", "organization (American) → organisation (British)", "criticized (American) → criticised (British)" and "artifacts (American) → artefacts (British)". Singapore use British English as the country are once a part of the British colonial together with Malaysia, Brunei and perhaps Myanmar (Burma) too. This differentiate our countries from the English used in the Philippines which inherited from the American. Do take a look on American and British English spelling differences and Comparison of American and British English to learn more about this. Thank you. (: ~ Muffin Wizard;)00:30, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If you are trying to ask me to use skype, I don't use it, sorry. Maybe you can try writing in Vietnamese and I use google translate. :D If you are asking why change the spelling, Muffin Wizard is right in pointing out Singapore uses British spelling, which you can also see in the official games website. But I suspect American spelling was used because other articles just copy and used it too. I am fine either way thou.--Huaiwei (talk) 02:52, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently you have not been heeding warnings, making multiple reversions over multiple articles in the past few days, without a word of explanation or even a hint of attempting to discuss your reversions. Kindly note that language proficiency is not an excuse not to engage in a conversation of any sort, especially if you deem yourself proficient enough to edit English-language articles. My patience is wearing thin. Do not force me to take this to Wikipedia:Dispute resolution, in particular over Wikipedia:Edit warring and Wikipedia:Ownership of articles over something as silly as this. Thank you.--Huaiwei (talk) 18:21, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and I hope you are not under the illusion that I am not aware of any of the reversions or unexplained removals you have been making, just because I avoided engaging in pointless Edit warring in every article. I am gathering evidence of your behavior and will furnish them as evidence if I am forced to escalate this issue. Just a few examples in one article alone:
I would think it far more constructive to use your time to build up the tonnes of other articles which need to be worked on, instead of trying to nitpick over the smallest issues like these.--Huaiwei (talk) 18:33, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
02 June
Hello, iam Syafiq from Malaysian....
I just want to tell u that im very interest to modify my national pages (28th Malaysia at the SEA games 2015), but once i have already modified it... i saw u modified it back. So, i hope we have a great deal that *Please dont interfere my recent edited on 28th Malaysia at the SEA games 2015 cuz this is my country n i want to modify with on my own way.
Btw thanks too for teaching me how to edit a difficult things on the page.....
Hello, i am garyt45 ...
I just want to inform you that kindly take note that please do not interfere in my newly written squash on the SEA games 2015 article as you have reverted my original article countless of time...If you wish to contribute you may update the results, it's making me frustrated to update the table because you change my table resulting conflict in
edit...I am getting tired and annoyed with your constantly reverting now...Otherwise I would stop starting a new article on the Sea games 2015...Thank you...
p/s sorry to be rude...but i'm really tired of writing a new article only to see it to be 'destroyed', hope you can understand...
Hi, please do not disturb the SEA Games Pencak silat sub-pages! I've only created them first so that it's easier for me to edit them ASAP later on. Please do not change/edit/disturb on anything until I'm actually done. Obviously I wasn't done yet. So don't just go around changing them hastily. Thanks.
Sincerely, Danialrosli (talk) 17:40, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have to start questioning the competence now. Still no explanation as of why I suddenly got a level 3 warning and accused of vandalism without being previously blocked for my 2 years (and 30K+ edits) and no warning for months. Now totally incorrect tagging with no evidence it was requested by creator. Boyconga278 could you please start talking before you dig yourself a deeper hole? Qed237(talk)21:39, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop using my signature, it may look like I wrote something I did not write. You are not making any sence, I will make it clear. Why did yhou give me a level 3 warning? Why did you put the templates as CSD G7 when editor has not requested deletion? Qed237(talk)22:46, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Templates for discussion
Hi, Could you please provide a reason for why you want the templates you added at TfD here should be discussed/deleted? If you cant have a reason then why do you add them? Qed237(talk)21:44, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I was reading some of the messages here in your talkpage, and it seems you have this habit of reverting anyone's edits without valid reasons or without further explanations. In regards with 2019 Southeast Asian Games, I have said that it is not a violation of Wikipedia:TOOEARLY. The article only follows those other articles such as the 2023 FIBA Basketball World Cup. Before reverting other edits, please consider discussing it first. Any reverting of edits will be considered as an act of vandalism — please consider that as a warning.--AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k•05:28, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Renzoy16 I think you has not understands about Southeast Asian Games that!. I say you will been have not understand about games because OCA has no source in like website here. Your website of Philippine Olympic Committee about 2019 Southeast Asian Games is not source but may have to deleted this article. Thanks! Boyconga278 (talk) 05:48, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Boyconga, this is your final warning. You can not label edits as vandalism when they clearly are not. READ WP:VANDALISM or you will be bocked for a long time and I seriously doubt your WP:COMPETENCE it might have been to soon (I dont know), but it is NOT VANDALISM. Qed237(talk)14:27, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, @BU Rob13: Thank you, I was see template afd for Athletics at the 2015 Southeast Asian Games - Men's 100 metres because you will delete as close to this articles. Boyconga278 (talk) 14:52, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Anh có điên không? Bạn không thể phân biệt được đó là sự phá hoại hay không?! Tôi sẽ báo cáo bạn tới admin nếu bạn tiếp tục hành xử như thế này!! Quoc Tru (talk) 07:26, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I told you from the start that you stepped on the wrong foot trying to accuse me of vandalism without any motivation and you still can not explain and keep doing this to other users. High level of disruption and if you can not answer and show some WP:COMPETENCE and communication I will have you blocked. Qed237(talk)14:47, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You can not tell me what to do, I am an experienced editor and I suggest you listen and also stop calling me "crazy". Can you please explain your edits and behaviour? Qed237(talk)15:19, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I will keep asking for answer every day until I get some response and if you refuse to answer I will double check your every edit until you are blocked from editing. Qed237(talk)11:45, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
So you are a vandal then? You can not even expalin what you do or why? I will investigate your every edit if you keep doing this. Qed237(talk)15:18, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
When have I lied? I asked you how my edits where vandalism and if you can say what vandalism is, and you can not answer that! And your actions say you dont have WP:COMPETENCE to edit here. Qed237(talk)15:52, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Your protection requests
Can you please read through our protection policy? Many times your protection requests make no sense (full protection for the odd bit of questionable editing? no.). Also, please don't add text like "([Edit=Allow only autoconfirmed users] (expires 6:00 pm, 30 December 2015, Wednesday (3 months, 24 days from now) (UTC−5)), ([Move=Administrator] (expires 23:00, 30 December 2015 (UTC))." It only confuses the archive bot. --NeilNtalk to me00:47, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history at 2018 FIFA World Cup qualification (CONMEBOL) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Qed237(talk)12:00, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
color
Tell me your reason to use those colors. Vietnam flag (red background, yellow star), team kit (red background, yellow stripes). there are nothing relate to yellow background red characters. All football team articles using color by their color flag or kit. So tell me your reason, don't say it's your favorite. Want 3 tripes flag, here, edit this.42.115.180.176 (talk) 05:30, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@42.115.180.176: What is your name? Where are you from? Tell me your reason about language Vietnamese? Do you know talk & write about language Vietnamese?
Thích tiếng việt chứ gì? Giờ nói tao nghe lý do mày dùng mấy màu đấy và xóa bài của tao. Tất cả các bài về đội tuyển khác đều dùng màu theo cờ hay theo áo đấu. Không ai dùng màu trái khoáy như mày. Nói lý do ra đây. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.55.47.198 (talk) 03:57, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@1.55.47.198: Tại sao bạn lại chửi bới với tôi về "đội tuyển bóng đá quốc gia Việt Nam" vậy? Nếu cờ Việt Nam chỉ có 2 màu nền đỏ và sao màu vàng giống như cờ Trung Quốc bị trùng lặp nên các bài về đội tuyển khác dùng màu khác theo cờ hay theo áo đấu là bạn muốn chọn màu gì đi? Nếu bạn phải nói trả lời cho mình thì mình đg sửa lại cho luôn đi! Hi mình nói đừng bạn buồn về đội tuyển Việt Nam mình nha! Boyconga278 (talk) 10:04, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nói như mày thì chục nước trên thế giới này trùng nhau đấy. Và trùng nhau thì làm sao, ảnh hưởng gì không. Đây là bài viết riêng về đội tuyển, ko phải bài tổng hợp chung mà phải sợ trùng. Để màu cơ bản xanh như tao để lúc đầu thì sao. Bảng hlv, bảng vị trí tao thêm vào có vấn đề gì mà mày xóa của tao. Tao làm gì mà mày vu tao phá hoại. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.55.47.198 (talk) 20:10, 11 September 2015
Bài đội tuyển quốc gia việt nam bên tiếng việt. đéo mẹ vừa xóa cả đống nội dung tao đưa vào mà giờ giả bộ ngây thơ kêu không làm à. Chưa kể mày còn dám đổ tao phá hoại nữa, thằng ăn cắp la làng.
@Hongqilim: Dont listen to much on Boyconga, he accused me (and admins) for vandalsim earlier despite me being an experienced editor. When I asked him what was vandalism in my edit, he could not answer. I strongly question his WP:COMPETENCE. Qed237(talk)16:40, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
As I and other editors have observed, your English-language editing abilities appear to be causing trouble. Your conduct in the edit-warring incident of earlier today, with your claims of vandalism and no engagement tended to confirm those views. While we encourage everyone to edit here on Wikipedia, we do expect that editors have language skills that allow them to participate fully. That, for instance, is why I confine my edits to the French Wikipedia to technical edits. Since there are time zone issues here, I will give you an opportunity to respond here. However, if you continue to edit-war and claim other editors are vandals, you will be blocked on competency grounds. Acroterion(talk)23:46, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Since there's been no response from this account, and it has clearly been used since I placed the message above, I've blocked it, pending a conversation (if possible) about successful editing. Acroterion(talk)17:52, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
