Talk:Maude system

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science

???

This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Template:Findsourcesnotice

What is Maude?

What is this Maude system? Is it some sort of mathematical programming language, a particular software program which is an implementation of such a language, or both smooshed together (a language whose only instantiation is this program)? --Gwern (contribs) 21:50, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Both. It's a language specification with an interpreter and runtime environment. There were some plans of a Maude compiler, but I don't know the current state of affairs. Ambarish 00:50, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Examples

I think that the 'mod's should really be 'fmod's. No rules are present. --92.196.72.115 (talk) 16:42, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Example 2 and following

I think that the example 2 is not correct. The operator '+' is not a constructor. It is a defined function, defined by the equations below. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.144.247.224 (talk) 11:23, 23 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Constructors in Maude do not have to be free, they can be indeed be governed by additional equations (see the Maude manual). 218.166.161.142 14:10, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but + is not a constructor of the natural numbers. A natural number is 0 or S(N:Nat), the term N1:Nat + N2:Nat is not a Nat (though it will reduce to one.) Taemyr 19:51, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Should $eq 0 + s(N) = s(N)$ be replaced by $eq 0 + N = N$? Otherwise how to calculate 0+0? Alexei Kopylov (talk) 23:18, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fix'd. Taemyr (talk) 07:14, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rewriting Maude

Maude is an interesting system that warrants an article that is well-wrutten, up-to-date and otherwise in line with existing model checking standards.

I've already done some work cleaning it up but I could use a more trained hand!

ZephyrP (talk) 21:41, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]