Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hanson's Local Buses

Hanson's Local Buses

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This subject does not seem to meet WP:N or WP:CORP. Charles (talk) 17:28, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom - I was actually gonna nominate this months ago but completely forgot so thank god someone did!, Anyway can't find any evidence of notability so will have to say Delete. –Davey2010^Talk 17:44, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Revert to original edits Article had sources with verifiable facts prior to deletion of 90% of content, including references to local press reports over initiatives that the bus company had implemented. I'm sure there are a number of other bus operators on WP that have less references than this article had prior to the mindless vandalism that had occurred. User:Dudleybus User talk:Dudleybus 23:50, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Article Creator, Timetables aren't reliable sources, When you created this article the first source you added was a link to someones bus images[1] .... so this looks to have been doomed from the start, As a keep !voter If you want this kept you need to provide sources (other than timetables), Thanks –Davey2010^Talk 00:23, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Davey2010. I did also at one stage add local press sources to the article which got stripped out. I have since found further press articles from two West Midlands news papers concerning this company, one about a charity initiative that they did and one regarding an inquest of an accident which a death was involved. I was unable to add that to the article as I have been unable to access wiki due to personal reasons. User:Dudleybus User talk:Dudleybus 00:41, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I shouldn't assumed bad faith there with my comment so have struck anyway there doesn't seem to be much info on the company but If you're able to find a reasonable amount I'd consider my !vote, I had found these [2][3] but other than that I'd found naff all

, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 01:25, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep although more secondary cites would be desirable Castroex (talk) 06:09, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you can find any secondary sources please enlighten us. Without them there is no point saying "Keep".Charles (talk) 10:21, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Don't mean to moan but "Keepers" are expected to provide sources otherwise the !vote counts for nothing here. –Davey2010^Talk 12:50, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]