Talk:The Mousetrap

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Mousetrap article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Theatre Mid‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Women writers

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:

Paul Bignell and Matthew Bell (2010-08-29). "Wikipedia springs 'Mousetrap' ending". Independent on Sunday.
Ben Leach (2010-08-29). "Agatha Christie's family criticise Wikipedia for revealing Mousetrap ending". The Telegraph.
"Wikipedia Reveals Secret of 'The Mousetrap'". Slashdot. 2010-09-01.
Noam Cohen (2010-09-17). "Spoiler Alert: Whodunit? Wikipedia Will Tell You". New York Times.

view · edit

Frequently asked questions

Q1: Should the article include the identity of the murderer? (Short answer: Yes.)

A1: Per Wikipedia's policy on "spoilers", "Spoilers are no different from any other content and should not be deleted solely because they are spoilers." This has been discussed numerous times on this article's talk page, and consensus among Wikipedia editors has consistently been in favor of keeping them. Keep in mind that there is an encyclopaedic benefit to researchers and other readers who have not and will not likely ever see the play.

Q2: Should the article have a spoiler warning? (Short answer: No.)

A2: Wikipedia does not use spoiler warnings in conjunction with its policy against censoring content, observing that "No other academic, scholarly, or other professional publication that describes or analyze works of fiction, such as other encyclopedias, includes disclaimers about spoilers when discussing said works." Consensus has shown that separating the end of the play into a separate section titled "Identity of the murderer" is sufficient to warn readers that they are about to read the end of the play.

Q3: Should we place the "Identity of the murder" section into a collapsible box/table/area? (Short answer: No.)

A3: Collapsible areas can make it difficult for mobile browsers or accessibility tools such as those used by the visually impaired to correctly display the page, which is contrary to Wikipedia's goal to be accessible to everyone. Because of this, using such techniques to hide text is generally discouraged in articles unless it is used to collapse long lists or other such information that would otherwise be disadvantageous to simply scroll through.

Q4: Should Wikipedia respect the tradition to not spoil the end of the play? (Short answer: No.)

A4: The play itself, including the ending, has been in publication since 1954 and is widely available, and the article's plot summary reflects that. As a worldwide information resource, Wikipedia is not censored, and does not remove spoilers simply because they are spoilers. There is an encyclopaedic benefit to researchers and other readers who have not and will not likely ever be able to see the play. Discussions on the article have determined that these benefits outweigh the tradition to not spoil it.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on November 25, 2011 and November 25, 2014.

Archives

Index

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.