Talk:Hotel Bel-Air

Hotels C‑class

	Hotels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hotels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the hospitality industry, including hotels, motels, resorts, and destination spas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HotelsWikipedia:WikiProject HotelsTemplate:WikiProject HotelsHotels
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

California C‑class Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Not Unique

This is not the only hotel in the world of this name. I think it should be Hotel Bel-Air (California). The section headed "Reception" has had no source for years and looks like adcvertising. Chemical Engineer (talk) 20:10, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Paul, in Saudi (talk) 09:16, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

lede

hello everyone. i updated the lead, and added some more information to it, as well as a bit of info to the info box. will be making a few more edits as i go along -- let me know if you have any questions or concerns. GoGatorMeds (talk) 16:56, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed the wording of the lead and the history section in some areas, as well as added some more specific information. Again, let me know if there is anything you would like to discuss. GoGatorMeds (talk) 17:19, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please be careful to find secondary reliable sources for the material you add. Even though we may think we know the facts, which have been widely reported, it's important that we present them as they have been presented by recognized published sources. SPECIFICO talk 19:02, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response, but I'm wondering which sources you're referring to that you do not think are reliable. Could you tell me which ones, so I can know what to do for future edits/sourcing? GoGatorMeds (talk) 19:15, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]