User talk:SweetNightmares/Archive 1

Archive 1

TfD nomination of Template:Zack Snyder

Template:Zack Snyder has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. —Erik (talk • contrib) 14:48, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

(For your information, the template underwent deletion review, and there was no criteria for speedy deletion. In good faith, one of the editors who sought to overturn deletion at WP:DRV placed it at WP:TFD so discussion can be held.) —Erik (talk • contrib) 14:48, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

French simple

Hello, I have been looking into the idea of a Simple French wikipedia. And I have noted down some ideas Here. I don't know if you're still active on wikipedia. But if you are, your input would be greatly appreciated! --Île flottɑnte~Floɑting islɑnd ^Talk 00:02, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

April 2010

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Alexander the Great. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. —Sean Whitton / 14:44, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Dermatology, etc

I replied regarding Acne excoriée des jeunes filles. Also, any interest in dermatology? This field of medicine has a rich history, with beginnings in France and England. You could be a real asset to the Dermatology task force. Most recently we have been working on the Bolognia push, and there is still a lot of potential for new articles and redirects. Regardless, thank you for your work on wikipedia. ---kilbad (talk) 00:23, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Matrilineality

Since it's been so long since your 27Oct10 inputs to Matrilineality, which I have finally made the improvements for, the least I can do is let you know on your own page that I have, and that I also briefly responded to your inputs on the article's Talk page, just below your inputs. Please do advise me about the Judaism section. Keep up your good work on behalf of WP readers! For7thGen (talk) 00:42, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Mont Bellevue

Just to let you know, I've moved your content about the park to a separate article, Mont Bellevue Park. The park is certainly a valid article topic, but the borough is too — they should both have articles, rather than one article replacing the other one. But the way our naming conventions work on en:, the title Mont-Bellevue, Quebec has to be the borough rather than the park, because the comma format is for populated places (cities, towns, villages, boroughs, etc.) rather than geographic features. The park needs to be at a title which has the word park in it — and if further disambiguation were needed, because it's a geographic feature rather than a settlement the word "Quebec" would have to be in parentheses rather than being offset by a comma. Hope that helps a bit. Bearcat (talk) 19:52, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

No worries. I'm actually kind of surprised that fr: hasn't really done articles about the boroughs themselves; as far as I know, they've certainly done them for all of the other cities in Quebec with arrondissements. As for the park article, the stub notice is probably okay for now, since it's still really only a couple of paragraphs long — but there is also a bit of a tendency on here to just leave the stub notices forever, even when the article has gotten really long and thorough, so any individual editor is free to make a judgement call one way or the other at any time. Bearcat (talk) 21:07, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Tetsuya Ishida

G'day;

I'm kinda new to wikipedia so I've decided to proofread the English translation of the Tetsuya Ishida page. Let me know what you think. It won't be done all at once though. Hope it helps. M miyama (talk) 14:41, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Your Favorite Enemies

Hello "SweetNightmares"! I replied to your post on the talk page of "Your Favorite Enemies" a few days ago. And since you might have not noticed, I thought of writing you again here this time. Would it be the proper way to do? I'm still new here on Wikipedia. And this is why I am contacting you! I would like to make contributions to the article of "Your Favorite Enemies", though I am still learning about the ethic of bringing contributions here on Wikipedia. Would you mind helping me, or redirecting me to other users or services here, which might be more incline to do so? Once again, thanks for your help!Sophenemy (talk) 16:36, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	Thank you so much for fixing the issues on Beef Products. The article was a mess and needed some TLC. I hereby award you the Copyeditor's Barnstar for your hard work! :) Dillard421♂♂ (talk to me) 22:46, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Re: RfC

Please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Request comment on articles, policies, or other non-user issues point number three. Requests should be made using neutral language and your personal bias or "vote" should not be disclosed. The editor will be able to discern your opinion when they go to the article's talk page to fulfill RfC. Zepppep (talk) 04:43, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

fête

Do you pronounce "fight" for the word fête ? Fête (talk) 21:17, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

In Quebec city, the word fête is pronounced "fet" or "fight" ? Fête (talk) 22:07, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

expresse

In Quebec French, the word expresse is pronounced /ɛkspʁɛs/ or /ɛkspʁaɛ̯s/ ? Fête (talk) 00:34, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

kung-fu

Why Quebeckers pronounce /kɔŋfu/ instead of /kuŋfu/ ? Fête (talk) 01:10, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Oil cleansing method

Hello SweetNightmares. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Oil cleansing method, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to products. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 20:10, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Prod of Oil cleansing method

WARNING do not keep adding a prod template to Oil cleansing method, This is now the third time I have removed the tag. Have a read of WP:Prod and you will see that an article must not be prodded more than once. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:53, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Firstly, you did not delete the first request--which I added erroneously--another user did, so I would not be violating the three strike rule (in fact you are arguably the one guilty of edit warring). I corrected my actions by adding the proper template yet you removed it without explaining yourself on the talk page, as per standard procedure. If you are so confident that the page should not be deleted, why not allow for an open discussion? The "article," if you can call it that, clearly does not meet any of the criteria. Sorry I alerted you for the sake of transparency... - Sweet Nightmares 05:27, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

I don't think you read the rules about WP:Prod yes. We are not have having a WP:3RR situation yet. Yet I thank you for the speedy delete alert notification. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:34, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Ah, another Wikipedia bureaucrat dedicated to condescension and pissing around in paperwork instead of trying to make Wikipedia a better place... just what we need! - Sweet Nightmares 14:47, 30 November 2013 (UTC)