User talk:Wikipietime

This user is a proud member of WikiProject Private Equity.

WikiProject Private Equity Invitation!

You are cordially invited to join WikiProject Private Equity

You appear to be someone that may be interested in joining WikiProject Private Equity. Please accept this formal invitation from a current member of the project.

If you decide to join the project, please add the following box to your userpage: {{User WikiProject Private Equity}}

I hope you join - there are exciting projects ahead!

~~~~

Welcome!

Hello, Wikipietime, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Mountain pavilion weehawken, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 04:35, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mountain pavilion weehawken

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mountain pavilion weehawken requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 04:35, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Mountain pavilion weehawken

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Mountain pavilion weehawken, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 04:39, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jesse Benton, Ron Paul Campaign Manager.
To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ★ Pikks ★ ^MsG 22:21, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. I've given your recent contribution to Fourth Estate quite a trim, to conform to the WP:TOPIC policy. For example, "Mitt's petting zoo" could be considered for the Mitt Romney page, but it hasn't got anything to do with Fourth Estate. Be careful not to add your own analysis to the sources: I couldn't find anything about "media uproar" being the reason for Romney's statement, for example. Don't sign your mainspace contributions.

Whatever else, don't let grumpy editors get you down; stick with it! All the best.

--Old Moonraker (talk) 14:50, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on Talk:Son of BOSS. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 04:49, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I will work on it. I strive for being objective and factual. Thanks for the feed back. It looks like the Son of BOSS article is full sail; deservedly so. I have always been a "sniffer" and listen closer to what people do not say or express. On the premises that people tell lies and keep the truth silent. The arm of the LDS is far reaching as a major genealogy repository. I am not seeing this connection covered in the world of business and industry - puzzling. An ax grinder? Me? Or a seeker of real life drama and intrigue. Not really taking a position on a favorite candidate for president, or political party and acceptable of all religious beliefs, I do not posses an axe to grind. A knowledge seeker is my self description. Wikipietime (talk) 13:34, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I gave you that warning because you accused another editor of working for Congress and being a "mole" of some sort. Take a look at this change you made; [1]; what does being a Mormon have anything to do with a tax shelter? It's unfounded and original research which is prohibited on Wikipedia. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 15:17, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to J. W. "Bill" Marriott, Jr.. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 15:18, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is the page about my self off limits for pontificating? If other more experienced editors have not already corrected, I will try to rectify. A suppressive tone for aspiring contributors certainly would not benefit the Wikipedia. Wikipietime (talk) 17:15, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You made that edit to a page on a public figure, not on your own page. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 02:12, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anxiously awaiting Mr. Vernon or Frecklfoots treatment of changes to first section of the Son of BOSS article with an un referenced source and violation of Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. My "improprieties" were pounced upon. Wikipietime (talk) 15:45, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Peter J. Reilly

The article Peter J. Reilly has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No notability asserted.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Electric Catfish 21:24, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

Hello, Wikipietime. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 02:12, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Rights Managed. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Please use the talk page for questions, not the main article page. Thank you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 02:20, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That was made to the main page in error, I intended to place into the talk. The article is most lacking and I am working on a project involving Right Management and would like to have a discussion on how the article could be improved. Any act of vandalism was totally unintentional and done in error. Wikipietime (talk) 05:02, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, it wasn't the first time you've done it, just be careful. If I may ask, what kind of project are you working on? --Mr. Vernon (talk) 05:07, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have been contracted to research DAM, Digital Asset Management/Rights, for an educational client. The space is changing most rapidly with advent of new technology, impression rates, etc., Clients are concerned of running afoul of their licensing terms for video and image assets. Wikipietime (talk) 05:26, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Peter J. Reilly

A tag has been placed on Peter J. Reilly requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 02:21, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I objected to speedy deletion and added my reasoning to the talk page. Wikipietime (talk) 05:21, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the Peter J. Reilly from Son of Boss, pending outcome of whether an article will exist on him.Wikipietime (talk) 12:27, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

== Neutral point of view ==

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Julian Castro. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:42, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely, I have corrected those wayward ways. Apologies for the trouble and thank you for correcting. Wikipietime (talk) 03:57, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Thurston Howell, III, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Mr. Vernon (talk) 23:52, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Respectfully, would you please explain to me how that process works. Twice, you removed my content without valid recourse. I did not place or detect anything personal in my paragraph. I am citing the fact. Should this not be being discussed for resolution on the noticeboard? I mean really a suppression of facts on a fictional character, Howell. Trivia buffs would relish this morsel. The latest revision does not even mention Mitt Romney. I am waiting for an answer as to whether the source is valid and recognizable. Please do not take it personal, I prefer facts, clarity, discussion and understanding. If you feel a threat is warranted, then execute on it or else explain the full facts of my faults.Wikipietime (talk) 00:15, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You don't refer to other Wikipedia editors in an article like you did here. 72Dino (talk) 00:19, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I had wondered about that but could not find a reference on this. I will not do again. I am looking down the road and see that ;

As a rule of thumb, when in doubt, do not block; instead, consult other administrators for advice. After placing a block that may be controversial, it is a good idea to make a note of the block at the administrators' incidents noticeboard for peer review.

Administrators should take special care when dealing with new users. Beginning editors are often unfamiliar with Wikipedia policy and convention, and so their behavior may initially appear to be disruptive. Responding to these new users with excessive force can discourage them from editing in the future

So, being threatened to being blocked is a form of intimidation, to some. But, I am trying to avoid an adversarial relationship and remain in good faith pragmatic. Wikipietime (talk) 00:27, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Did you honestly believe that attacking another editor on an article page was "OK" because you couldn't find those pages? --Mr. Vernon (talk) 00:37, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So, 72Dino did you look at the editing that was done to Thurston Howell, III by talk? Was that a problem? We have two issues going here. Wikipietime (talk) 00:39, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The fictional capitalistic character, Howell, created by [[Sherwood Schwartz|Sherwood Schwartz]] has been mentioned several times on network American television as a satirical portrayal of the 2012 GOP candidate for president of the U.S; but apparently some editors of wikipedia feel that either this personified personality or the popular media sources cited for inclusion are not noteworthy.

Fact, and cited as so. Should you have not have only removed the violation?; but apparently some editors of wikipedia feel that either this personified personality or the popular media sources cited for inclusion are not noteworthy and left my contribution? I am feeling really discouraged as to what kind of ideological editors are wanted here.Wikipietime (talk) 00:51, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Wikipietime. You have new messages at Talk:William Burton Roy.
Message added 05:55, 15 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Mr. Vernon (talk) 05:55, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as on Talk:Thurston Howell, III, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. Shearonink (talk) 13:49, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Douglas Aldrich for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Douglas Aldrich is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas Aldrich until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 18:34, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bigamy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to George Ives

Douglas Aldrich (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to George Ives

The Jim Backus Show (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to George Ives

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mountain Pavilion

Hey Wikipietime,

I see you added a link to Mountain Pavilion, and also that you've had some trouble keeping from being deleted before. Let's see if we can improve the article; right now, much of it is written exactly like the source you've found which we try not to do. Can you find some more references? - Theornamentalist (talk) 11:59, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]