Jump to content

User talk:Me-123567-Me

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Thecatholicguy (talk | contribs) at 03:15, 23 March 2012. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, Me-123567-Me, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  GreenJoe 19:49, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Brazilian State of Alagoas Gay Marriage

I was adding the information to the template's discussion page while you were asking. You can read it there now. I put all of the media references there. Denisxavier (talk) 02:01, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the editing tips. I ask you to help me with the text about the Brazilian State of Alagoas' gay marriage status I wrote on the articles Same-sex marriage, Same sex marriage in Brazil and the template page, since English is not my first language and I am afraid my text might look foolish and inadequate for an encyclopedia. Denisxavier (talk) 02:33, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Doing the best I can. Do you know how to change the coulour of the Alagoas State on the World map to Dark Blue? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Denisxavier (talkcontribs) 02:49, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I removed nothing in Same-sex marriage in Alagoas, I only added a template. Ergo, I don't understand your message. Hekerui (talk) 19:13, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping me show my point of view at the articles discussion pages. My lack of English vocabulary makes it really hard to participate in here, when there are details I apparently cannot explain to some of the editors, because of language. And it is really important to me that I get this information sent out to the world because it is very true and because I am so proud to have been born on the first state in Brazil where people has such rights. Denisxavier (talk) 22:16, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Green Party of Alberta

You're usually on top of my edits to Green party articles, but you haven't commented on Talk:Green Party of Alberta#Requested move. 117Avenue (talk) 03:38, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Canadian political party

Please read WP:BRD. If a change is controversial, it should be discussed on the talk page first, then implemented, especially for a live template. Thanks, 117Avenue (talk) 03:46, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nowhere in 3RR do I see consensus before revert. It appears to me you are making up rules. I have stated the rule is consensus before change, and I again encourage you to follow this rule. You are right on one point, I unfortunately saw the discussion after making the revert. 117Avenue (talk) 04:27, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your immediate move after RM close of Alberta Greens

I have reverted your move of Alberta Greens. It is not cool to do what you did immediately after the close of an RM discussion. Plus you failed to correct all the double redirects you created when you made the move. These harm the encyclopedia and must be fixed promptly. Lucky the bots caught them. You clearly disagree with the RM decision (50% of participants usually do so that's not unusual). However, if you feel strongly that a new consensus can be reached for a return to whatever name you feel most suits this article, then open a new RM on the article talk page. That is the process you should follow. --Mike Cline (talk) 21:20, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Recall

If you expect some sort of rational answer to the question you posed on my talk, you might want to be a bit more explict and specific in what you are asking? --Mike Cline (talk) 01:47, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Yukon Green/row requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Arctic Gnome (talkcontribs) 05:56, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Yukon Green requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Arctic Gnome (talkcontribs) 15:40, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:C05-abrioux appleby.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:C05-abrioux appleby.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 17:54, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ULC Seminary is a fictitious name, it is not an authorized or official website for any Universal Life Church.Thecatholicguy (talk) 02:14, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

(Not appropriate for the lead) The paragraph if not appropriate for lead, simply drop it down from the lead. Such has been done Thecatholicguy (talk) 03:15, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]