Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William John Smart

William John Smart

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Borderline candidate for deletion as an advert. He appears to be a successful architect, but no more notable than anyone else in the industry, which means that he isn't notable enough for a wikipedia article (IMO). No evidence of significant coverage of HIM, not just his work, in independent reliable sources. One IP edit resolves to his company, so almost certainly a WP:COI or WP:AUTOBIO. The-Pope (talk) 09:20, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. This appears to be this guy's CV, and there are no real indications of notability. Nick-D (talk) 01:11, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The subject of the article lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails the notability guidelines for biographies. Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 19:50, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]