Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1632 places

1632 places

Similar to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1632 institutions, this is a non-notable, pile of plots from an alternate universe. Ricky81682 (talk) 19:20, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Seems to have sources from other notable people i suppose. Str8cash (talk) 19:28, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
All those sources are from the same universe of books and fan fiction. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 19:34, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Purely in-universe. Strangely, there does not appear to be a 1632 wiki at wikia to transwiki to. Ray^Talk 21:57, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There is a Eric Flint wiki though. Already left a message for anybody there. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 00:18, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination Nick-D (talk) 10:19, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Ricky. Sincerely, Jack Merridew 04:28, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Jack Merridew 06:54, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. -- Jack Merridew 06:54, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- Jack Merridew 06:55, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for preference or (possibly) merge back to 1632 series. If kept, it should be renamed to reflect the refernece to the novel series not the year 1632. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:51, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Kepp a list of locations is a perfectly reasonable article to have for a fictional universe, and the 1632 series is a multi-author shared universe with a lot of published titles. 76.66.202.123 (talk) 11:15, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]