Jump to content

User talk:NeroAxis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by LeaveSleaves (talk | contribs) at 15:03, 26 June 2009 (June 2009). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hello, NeroAxis! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! --Jza84 |  Talk  23:01, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

June 2009

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Andy Murray. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 12:02, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is not personal commentary, it is an objective analysis of the facts and a consequent adaptation of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NeroAxis (talkcontribs) 13:34, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This issue has been discussed to death on the talk page, and consensus reached as to how to proceed. If you disagree then the onus is on you to attempt to change people's minds on the talk page, not to repeatedly re-edit the article (especially not while changing the admonishment in the accompanying comment to say exactly the opposite of what it previously did). Doing so will likely lead to your being blocked from editing entirely. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 13:42, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will continue to state the truth on that page, as all Wikipedians, without regard for circumstance or consensus, should always do. The facts are on my side, any attempt to block me from editing, and the subsequent legal process which will follow, will reflect that.

Stop the edit warring immediately. You are close to violating the three revert rule, in which case you will be blocked for disruptive behaviour. If you have issues with the content of the article, discuss it on the article's talk page. LeaveSleaves 14:21, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As I have stated before, I am doing nothing wrong in a legalistic sense, and therefore should not be subjected to a ban on the basis of my actions. You are welcome to ban me, but please be aware of the legal consequences that the individual who commits the action will face.

You have been reported at edit warring noticeboard. Also please read Wikipedia policy on making legal threats. LeaveSleaves 15:03, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]