User talk:Enochlau

Hi! I welcome comments, suggestions and complaints.

READ THIS FIRST: Please use the "new section" tab or the + sign at the top of this page to start a discussion with me. Do not simply edit this page and add it somewhere. Do not add it to the archives. If you are here to contest a deletion that I have made, please make sure that you have read Wikipedia:Why was my page deleted? before you post.

If you want to suggest content for the Wikipedia Signpost, please use the tip line.

I'll reply here or on your talk page, so keep an eye on both. However, I will never reply via email, unless I know you personally.

This user is an administrator on the English Wikipedia. (verify)

G'day

G'day esteemed person who has expressed interest in Sydney based meetups at this page (I hope that's the correct wording for the formal greeting!!). You may have heard that Australia is to have its very own 'chapter' of the Wikimedia Foundation - and further, there's a meeting coming up to discuss / enact the chapter's incorporation (details here). I'm afraid that I don't know too much about the details of what this entails, other than having a private hope that we might get a secret handshake, and maybe cheap coffee at wikimania (this is a poor attempt at humour - I'm sure that the Chapter's do great work, and it's a good thing that Australia is to have one).

If you're interested in meeting up this weekend (the set date is the 20th) - or later, then please do head over here and sign up, or make a comment at the talk page... the drive to create the chapter has largely come from another town in Australia that I'm afraid I haven't actually heard much about.. and anything they can do.... right? - cheers, Privatemusings (talk) 11:11, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

editing help

Hi there Enoch!

A university class I've been trying to convince to get involved in using WP in their class has today agreed to do so. In the class they rewrote the text of Religious Nationalism. I was wondering if you could have a look at it and edit it mercilessly (as the saying goes). Perhaps if you could convince others to get in on the act too that would be great.

Here is the diff of the edit they made [1].

Thanks for your help,

Witty Lama 10:36, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Please note that the section Religious Nationalism has now been separated from the main article Nationalism into its own article Religious nationalism. Please join in and help bring this newly formed article up to standard. Especially important is avoiding a Systemic Bias and adding Citations.

All the best, Witty Lama 04:57, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

I promise to take a look when I get some time. enochlau (talk) 22:03, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Drinks and a wiki chat?

G'day sydneysider - fancy a 'not quite a meetup but a few drinks' sort of thing? - We can chat about the new aussie chapter, the price of eggs and have our very own 2020 Wiki Summit! - or just sink a couple of cold ones and gass bag about the good 'ol days of wiki, when an editor could get some repsect (not a typo)! I've suggested something here so take a look and sign up if you're up for it... cheers, Privatemusings (talk) 02:28, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleting images on Commons but not replacing them

I noticed that you deleted an image that apparently is also on Commons but did not change the link in the article that uses the image. Is this a common occurrence? Do administrators typically delete images from Wikipedia because there is a copy on Commons without replacing the actual links in the articles? --ElKevbo (talk) 15:12, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

I deleted that a year ago. I don't remember this image in particular, but based on the deletion reason I entered, I suspect that at the time that I deleted it, there was an exact replica of that image on Commons with the same name - in which case, yes, admins on the English Wikipedia will delete the local version, because the image link will still work (if a local image is not found, it will look on the Commons for a file of the same name). However, this image was deleted on the Commons recently [2], because it was not tagged correctly. It appears that this image was a PD-old image, so I'm happy to restore the local version on the English Wikipedia if you like - not sure why it wasn't tagged correctly on the Commons (I'm not an admin there, can't see deleted edit history). enochlau (talk) 22:01, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Holy crap did that timestamp say 2007 and not 2008? Wow - color me embarrassed! If I had noticed then I certainly wouldn't have bothered you about it as it is quite ridiculous to expect anyone to remember a specific incident from back that far.

If you could please restore the local copy of the image that would be spiffy. Thanks! --ElKevbo (talk) 22:25, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Done. But now it needs sources otherwise it'll be deleted locally as well. enochlau (talk) 03:26, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Done. Thanks again! --ElKevbo (talk) 05:38, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

2advanced

How is their entry not blatant advertising? In retrospect, I realize our entry was but we would like to add our company in some fashion. Can you offer any suggestions? We've won awards and have been online since 1996.

regards,

Derrick Stewart dstewart@biglickmedia.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dstewart21 (talk • contribs) 17:50, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

See WP:CORP. enochlau (talk) 04:30, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Dashes in the Signpost

Greetings, Enochlau. You have probably not noticed, but I have been regularly making minor edits to articles of the Wikipedia Signpost for at least a month; in your case, I have mostly spend these on converting the hyphens between the external links and their descriptions to en dashes. The latter are much more suitable for this usage, and constitute an aesthetic improvement over hyphens—the style guidelines seem to agree with this view. Although I do not really mind continuing making these minor adjustments (and increasing my edit count in the process), it has finally dawned on me that it would be best to simply go to the source and see what the author thinks. At least I get to know if you agree with my changes (in which case I trust that you will take them up yourself) or disagree (in which case I should leave the hyphens be). In any event, that will be one thing less to worry about. Waltham, The Duke of 03:27, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Umm ok. enochlau (talk) 04:30, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Hmmm... Perhaps it's more than co-incidence that you write the smallest section of the Signpost. :-D Waltham, The Duke of 05:04, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

What is that meant to mean? enochlau (talk) 05:44, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

A jocular reference to your two-word reply... I should have made that clearer, I suppose. Waltham, The Duke of 06:09, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

lol ok :) enochlau (talk) 08:07, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

• Well, perhaps Waltham politely backed off when challenged; frankly, I don't think you should be writing high-profile texts without having someone else copy-edit them first. Sorry to be blunt, but "in good faith" doesn't mean "don't criticise". TONY (talk) 09:03, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Please add this to the Signpost.

[3] Wikipedia will become an HSC course from next year! :D Gizza^{Discuss ©} 06:24, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I saw it - Google sees all :) enochlau (talk) 14:07, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Your deletion of Mack McLarty

Was this deletion a mistake? I noticed you deleted the page as G8, but it was not a talk page so that obviously wouldn't apply. The person is definitely notable as a past White House Chief of Staff, and surely deserves a page. I'll be restoring the page as a presumably mistaken deletion if I don't hear from you within 24 hours. Thanks, VegaDark (talk) 05:37, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Oops, not sure how that happened -- obviously, I deleted the wrong page. Sorry. enochlau (talk) 15:02, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Your bad English—deal with it or don't write high-profile pieces

Look, don't write those right-ups if your English is so bad, or if you can't be bothered properly reviewing them before hitting the button. Sorry to be blunt, but it was very sloppy—embarrassingly so—and remains embarrassing since your friend Taxman (never the best writer despite his self-perception as such) has blundered in and reverted my inline queries without dealing with them. I'm not going to baby-sit what you write: I've pointed out the problems, and you're quite satisfied in leaving the crap in there for all to read. It's such a bad advertisement, for you and for the project. TONY (talk) 02:55, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

I can see how the first sentence is clumsy, and "overseas" is unforgivable, but I stand by the rest. enochlau (talk) 04:55, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

No, the rest was wanting. "... whether "it's fit for purpose, the context, the relevance, whether there's an alternative view"" was pretty bad, and discredits that organisation through its illiterate use of the language. The past tense, as I said, was wrong—it indicated that WP no longer reflects notions of the global village. You had quoted it partially in a way that rendered it false. See now. TONY (talk) 09:00, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Criticisms are fine. You just need to learn how to do it in a more constructive and civil manner. enochlau (talk) 09:58, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

I thought your edit summary (whingeing, was it) was far from civil. TONY (talk) 12:36, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

"right-ups"??? Sf-curmudgeon (talk) 01:04, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

well spotted. enochlau (talk) 06:22, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Your deletion of Developer 2.0

Was this deletion a mistake? I was writing this page to outline which is the principle of Developer 2.0 in an Enterprise Context. I don't really mind why it is blatant: advertising when: I'm writing about principles... without making reference to business. Is it maybe to the references lists. Well that's my blog too, and if you think it is advertising, ok (just remove it). To me, it's only a set of dump idea I wrote around the web and if you're thinking it's offending I would remove it. Can you resume that page without references? Developer 2.0 is an emerging idea, and what I've written is valuable (at least for me). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fmondora (talk • contribs) 04:44, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

I'm worried how about your deletion is democratic, and how the way you do things is collaborative making spirit of writing on wikipedia when: - I wrote an article about principles there; - You deleted it without informing me - I've asked you different days ago - You've never replied

Is it democratic? Is it the base principle of Wikipedia!

I don't think so, and I believe something wrong has happened because it's unbelievable watching how you're using your power of judging only because you're a moderator.

I'm sure it's the last time I'm writing on wikipedia... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fmondora (talk • contribs) 05:19, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay in replying - I have been busy in real life. The article as deleted read like a promotion, looking at the tone and the lack of emphasis on what it is as opposed to why it is great. The three links to your blog didn't help either. If you believe that this is a legitimate concept that deserves a place on Wikipedia, I encourage you to rewrite it, focusing on especially on these issues: verification (WP:VERIFY), especially with finding references that come from a variety of reputable sources, and tone (WP:TONE, WP:Spam#How_not_to_be_a_spammer). For the record, two other users expressed their concerns with the article before I deleted the article. enochlau (talk) 06:49, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

I don't like how the conversation is going and your judgment until people can read only your judgement and not my tones... It is still not democratic! Maybe it is a good strategy for driving people to different business target. By the way, I want my content back because its mine. I think it was a better policy to help authors growing in writing their ideas instead of deleting. I'm really afraid to see how a public service like wikipedia is not so public and how the only thing will remain public is your judgment without any evidence. Can you send back me by email my deleted content?

Sorry to break the news to you, but Wikipedia is not a democracy. Regardless, given the borderline nature of this case, I have restored the content of Developer 2.0, and added tags that represent what I believe to be problems with the article as it stands. Please try and rectify the problems to the best of your ability, and please request assistance from other users familiar with enterprise software principles to help you understand how to write your article. If the article still reads like an advertisement in a few days' time, the article may be considered for deletion again (by me or others). enochlau (talk) 16:13, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, I really appreciate the way you tagged, and in these days I'll work more on it. I'll come back next to you to feel your impression s. Thanks for all! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fmondora (talk • contribs) 05:47, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Looks like someone has deleted it now. enochlau (talk) 04:30, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Signpost/Wikipedia in the News - Keelty

I just got around to reading the stuff you gathered for Wikipedia in the News. How about those "professional" journalists, eh? Will they ever get it that you don't have to "hack" this site to edit the articles? And how about the purported AFP response: "A breach"? And the non-offence will be investigated? Good on ya and keep 'em coming mate; it lightens the day indeed! Retarius | Talk 08:36, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Yes, doing the "In the News" section has taught me more about the blathering media masses than anything else I've done before. enochlau (talk) 09:44, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Software

Hello Enochlau. You have been invited to join WikiProject Software, a WikiProject dedicated to improving the Software-related articles on Wikipedia. You received this invitation due to your interest in, or edits within the scope of the project. If you would like to join or just help out a bit, please visit the project page, and add your name to the list of project members. You may also wish to add {{User WikiProject Software}} to your userpage. If you know someone who might be intrested, please pass this message onto others by pasting this code into their talk page {{Software invite}}

Deletion of Baunt

This shows you deleted the redirect to the Bount page. First off, mispelling it with 'a' instead of 'o' is a plausible mistake. It is not an implausible typo or mosnomer. There is discussion on the talk page of the article here by Dekimasu as to the alternative spelling based on the German references of the clan. 'Baunto' is listed on the page and it is unclear as to whether adding the 'o' is a way to pluralize it for the entire clan, meaning Baunt could refer to a single individual. I do not see the harm in redirecting Baunt there, could it be restored? Tyciol (talk) 14:03, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I agree with you - if anything the katakana is ba not bo. enochlau (talk) 14:09, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Stop procrastinating…

… by monitoring my edits! kewpid (talk) 17:13, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Rikaichan

I recreated the entry Rikaichan (the original one was someone else's). I believe it does deserve been kept now. If not, please tell me. urashimataro (talk) 08:10, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

I use the plugin myself, so I know what it is. However, the issue then, as now, is that the article makes no reference to why it's notable enough for inclusion into Wikipedia. Is it popular? If so, how popular? enochlau (talk) 08:14, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

You could have had the decency to wait for an answer from me before proceeding with the speedy deletion. I, unlike you, can't imagine why you want to delete an article about a useful piece of software. Maybe an article about it could make it notable. BTW, you probably will want to delete also the article about Moji extension I also wrote (sarcasm).

My apologies: it wasn't you who added the template. urashimataro (talk) 11:12, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I didn't delete it, nor tag it the second time. But as deleted, you still hadn't addressed the problem of notability. Notability of a subject is a precondition for an article; so "Maybe an article about it could make it notable" doesn't make sense. enochlau (talk) 18:24, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

"+ sign at top of the page" in your instructions

Hi Enoch. I dont' know about other users, but (in reference for your instructions on how to add to this page) I see "new section", not "+". Might want to change your instructions accordingly, especially if you delete newbies' pages. Bongomatic (talk) 08:10, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Oh, I didn't think of that - good point. Mine is a + sign because of my preferences. enochlau (talk) 08:14, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

The Lowlifes Page

Hi. I had just finished off the page for the band The Lowlifes and in a flash it was deleted. I don't understand the reason for this saying that the band is unimportant and stuff. Everything in the brief article was factual and I was doing it for a good friend of mine who is the founder member of the band. Please put it back up as there was no reason for it to be deleted in my eyes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnpoxon (talk • contribs) 16:34, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

When I deleted it, it merely contained a message saying that it's being written - such a message is able to be deleted. The substantive article was subsequently deleted by other administrators, but I agree with their deletion. Your article as deleted made no assertion of notability: see Wikipedia:Notability (music). If you wish to contest the deletion, please go to WP:DRV. enochlau (talk) 18:23, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Deletion review for Gabrielles Wish

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Gabrielles Wish. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Corvus cornix_talk 22:57, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

TXGbusareINconvert (talk) 10:11, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Does I ability to use [[Category:Page created by TXGbusareINconvert (talk)]]? If is no, why can't. TXGbusareINconvert (talk) 10:11, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Read WP:CAT. The category is not useful and does not provide the user with any information, nor does it fit into one of the maintenance categories. You do not own articles: see WP:OWN. If you want to keep track of articles you create, use your watchlist. enochlau (talk) 10:14, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia in the News

Hi. How does one submit a potential story for this feature? --Dweller (talk) 11:00, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

There are words in a big blue box up the top of this page - have you read them? enochlau (talk) 13:06, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Evidently not. --Dweller (talk) 13:50, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

I'm publishing in about the next hour; are you close to being finished? Ral315 (talk) 04:49, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Sorry to rush you. No worries; next week is fine. Ral315 (talk) 07:03, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Re: Lange

Both :) kewpid (talk) 05:39, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Mentioning news sources

I'd like to suggest that the news sources for the items signalled in the Signpost's "In the News" section be mentioned explicitly; for example, as in:

• Falling exam passes blamed on Wikipedia 'littered with inaccuracies' (The Scotsman, 21 June 2008) – Scotland's falling exam pass rates have been blamed on Wikipedia and other online sources, which are said to contain misleading or inaccurate information that students pass off as their own.
• A Look Inside Wikipedia's Infrastructure (Data Center Knowledge, June 24, 2008) – Wikipedia's performance engineer Domas Mituzas discusses Wikipedia's infrastructure, which is an "unusual" case-study of a high-performance site.

Although the sources can, obviously, be found by following the links, prior knowledge of the source may help me (and presumably others) decide whether to follow the link or not.  --Lambiam 11:02, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

This is a great idea - thank you for your suggestion. I'll do it straight away. enochlau (talk) 11:03, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Bauer

Sorry I haven't let you know sooner, but we're fine to write the Bauer article; if you can do so relatively soon, I'd love to run it for this week. Ral315 (talk) 03:31, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Image wanted

Hi. I noticed you commented on this engine image. You may like to comment on the planned new image here Cuddlyable3 (talk) 12:09, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:FourStrokeCycle.mpg

Hey Enochlau, could you please undelete Image:FourStrokeCycle.mpg, which you deleted in Feb'06. The reason for deletion was a bit thin to begin with, and I'd like to convert the animation to ogg. The image which you suggested as a replacement in your reason has a factual inaccuracy, and since we have inline video display now in 2008 we might as well put an ogg version of a correct animation in the article. Thank you! --Dschwen 12:40, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Rescued

Hi. I see you were involved in rescuing (that is, not deleting) Sports Mogul a while back, and you made some suggestions for improvement at that time. Nothing's been done to it since. Related articles are marked for cleanup and/or COI. I know nothing about such games and can't judge notability of the various articles, but some of them seem unencyclopedic. You might take a look? Thanks. (I'll watch this page for a while.) --Hordaland (talk) 10:17, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Could you help?

The article Burger King legal issues is undergoing a featured article review and I would like some assistance in insuring the Burger King Corporation v. Hungry Jack's Pty Limited ([2001] NSWCA 187) is properly cited and factually correct. Searching through the WP:AUSLAW project I came across your page.

Your user page says you are a law student in Australia, thus you have a serious leg up on me in the area. Any help you could provide would be greatly appreciated.

The FAC discussion is here

Thank you for your time, --Jeremy ( Blah blah...) 19:00, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

G'day NewSouthWikiWelshman

...and I mean 'welshman' in the most gender neutral way, of course...and I'm aware that not all of you guys are from NSW.. and I'm aware that this hasn't been the most smoothly written note in Wiki's history, but hey ho...slaps head, persuades voices in head to pipe down, and continues.... Fancy attending a meetup? - We've got some interested Chapter stuff to chat about, no doubt there may be some tales of Arabian Nights (or at least Egyptian conferences), and it just generally felt like it was about time..... head over here if you're interested.... do feel free to wiki-edit away in the usual fashion too if you've got any other ideas! cheers all, Privatemusings (talk) 07:25, 29 July 2008 (UTC)you've been spammed in this nature because you signed up as interested in being notified about this sort of thing.. hope that's ok!

Spoken Article help

Hi. I've recently begun a Spoken Article for Wikipedia:About. I would like to hear your veteran feedback on this rough draft of part one of four to six parts. In particular, if you could help me with any of the following, I'd be happy:

• Whether or not the sample is even good enough to warrant me to continue speaking the article and fixing errors in this draft
• Any pronunciation or tone errors
• Any suggestions on speed, pauses, titling, etc.

You can access the file here (10 MB). Thanks so much for helping this Spoken Newbie, CB (ö) 05:26, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: Klystron.jpg

Just reformatted the summary for your image as an 'Information' template. Figured you wouldn't mind. --Chetvorno^TALK 21:39, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Spam in Country Club Resort

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Country Club Resort, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Country Club Resort is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Country Club Resort, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 14:40, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Dotfuscator.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dotfuscator.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Arilang1234

Hi,even though you have removed the eunuch section,I still think eunuch culture and eunuch politic both had played very important role in nearly all the Chinese imperial court.To omit it, would be like cutting away a big chunk of Chinese history.Arilang1234 (talk) 07:59, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Hi,I notice that you have removed all my contributions.Can you tell me why?May be can put some back?Arilang1234 (talk) 17:53, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Note that the article is about the Boxer Rebellion, NOT about Chinese history in general. If it's not relevant to the Boxer Rebellion, it doesn't go into the article. It's that simple. enochlau (talk) 23:53, 7 September 2008 (UTC)