Jump to content

Talk:Australian ten-cent coin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 218.166.36.102 (talk) at 02:30, 27 February 2008 (fair use resolved). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconNumismatics Stub‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconAustralia Stub‑class
WikiProject iconAustralian ten-cent coin is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia.
Note icon
The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to help@wikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Moved all to Australian X cent coin for internal consistency. Duja 11:31, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


10c coin (Australian)Ten cent coin (Australian) — A couple of days ago, Extra3 moved all the Australian banknotes and coins to alternative names. Personally I think the new new names are not as clear. Unfortunately, Wikipedia:Naming conventions (numbers and dates) have little on this topic, so there isn't one clear way to go. However, I should note that other currencies (eg. [1] [2]) use the "spelled out" method of page naming.

I asked Extra3 for his reasons on the page moves to which he replied on my talk page. His main reason seemed to be that people new to Wikipedia may type "$5" into the search box looking for the $5 note. Which I suppose is possible, but I think it would be better in this example to create a redirect $5 note (Australian)Five dollar note (Australian). This way the article remains clear whilst at the same time making sure people typing in "$5" into the search box gets what they are looking for.

So, in conclusion - I would suggest these articles be moved back to their previous name, then redirects created on the "new" names. DWZ (talkemailcontribs) 03:57, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that this is a "multiple page moves" request and also includes the following articles:

Survey

Add  # '''Support'''  or  # '''Oppose'''  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~. Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.

Survey - in support of the move

  1. Hesperian 03:57, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - As above --DWZ (talkemailcontribs) 03:59, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Enlil Ninlil 04:08, 5 February 2007 (UTC) Yes, it was similar to that in the first place.[reply]
  4. Support Joe I 04:37, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support, but rather "Australian" should be prefixed, as in Australian ten cent coin. However, if the parenthetical form is to be retained, the n needs to be dropped. Chris cheese whine 17:05, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survey - in opposition to the move

Discussion

Add any additional comments:

Fix a class of problem, not an instance of a problem I will support a method that works globally. This issue has been raised at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numismatics#Australian Article Name. But no consensus is reached. I would like to take this opportunity and list articles of individual denominations elsewhere so that global consistency is ensured.

euro

... (complete listing at {{Euro topics}}

USD

Obsolete
Current

(complete listing at {{US currency and coinage}}

...

CAD

(complete listing at {{Canadian currency and coinage}}

...

...

British

Pre-decimal

(complete listing at {{British coinage}}

Decimal

...

Irish

{{Irish currency and coinage}}

Japanese

Thai

{{Thailand currency and coinage}}

Nicaraguan

{{Nicaraguan currency and coinage}}

Danish

{{DK currency and coinage}}

Some medieval

--ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 04:45, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Result: move to Australian 10 cent coin, as is practise for the majority of other coins. Asics talk 21:15, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All have been moved to Australian X cent/dollar note/coin, except 50 cent coin, and 100 dollar note, as an admin needs to do those for some reason. Asics talk 21:32, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Done. See also Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_February_4#Australian_denominations. Duja 11:31, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Duja (talkcontribs) 11:43, 12 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Moves

Hay can you people just stick to one heading and stop moving the pages. Wast of time. Thanks Enlil Ninlil 11:14, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Lyrebird-on-reverse-of-Australian-10-cent-coin.jpg

Image:Lyrebird-on-reverse-of-Australian-10-cent-coin.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]