User talk:Snowolf

Snowolf (talk • botwiki • u:space • admin scout • npw • vp)

Note: If it doesn't break the page, remove other things, I would like vandalism to remain ;-)

Suggestbot

Sorry, we weren't able to suggest any articles for you. Something is probably wrong on our end. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SuggestBot (talk • contribs) 19:39, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

How dare you revert R and then unrevert your revert back to R's version. It just goes to show you... R is always right....and don't you forget it. O_O :D. Hmm...it appears I just beat you to a revert. :]. And you want to help that user? I'm a bit busy with Huggle. -- R ^TalkContribs_@ 17:56, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so when the block expires. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 19:28, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked myself - again! XD Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 19:29, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol

It's people like you that make us manual RC patrollers feel useless! I've been beaten to an edit 6 times in the last 20 minutes by you! grrrr. :-) --.ιΙ Inhuman14 Ιι. 19:32, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm using Lupin's, because IRC and direct connection interfaces do not work with my parental restrictions. :-( --.ιΙ Inhuman14 Ιι. 19:36, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re Link Reversions

Follow the full deletion discussion on the page with the copyrighted terms (I don't want to mention it here because the point is to end involvement with Wikipedia and remove all copyrighted terms and every time you mention the page google crawls and and you guys spawn like 50 more auto-pages ... it's totally ridiculous). The history is we added an article on a piece of software, got into an argument related to bias in the NMS list, and decided to end all involvement with wikipedia and you guys keep recreating web pages that use our trademarks without our permission as a result. The end decision is that the issues were not constructive and the related pages were permanently courtesy blanked, as these two pages should be as well. We will not be having any further involvement with Wikipedia once these pages don't show up on google indexes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Popperian (talk • contribs) 20:22, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Editing and citations

I am unaware due to relative newbieness how to do sources and stuff. Proof of the edit i made is only i witnessed it first hand when it happened and i suppose the Archimedes institute would also be proof and could therefore be qouted as citation. I chose this subject as my first contribution to wikipedia as it is something only a limited number of people would be as aware of as i am. —Preceding unsigned comment added by PJPIP (talk • contribs) 21:13, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Review for JANJAN

An editor has asked for a deletion review of JANJAN. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Joe 21:23, 21 January 2008 (UTC) (not the nominator)[reply]

My change

My change was made as it was actually correct information. If you read her profile at Nbc10.com you will find that she does live with a dog and not a small boy. I will be changing it back and will do it everyday if need be. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.38.6.30 (talk) 22:13, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cyprus

A regime, not a recognized government rules the occupied areas of Cyprus. The original wording was changed by user 82.34.251.230, on 16 Jan, see [1]. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.99.136.176 (talk) 23:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Golic

I think you should take a more careful look at the material you reincluded by reverting my edit. And then, you can remove the template you place on my page. Thanks. --Mr R 23:33, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Cheers. --Mr R 23:36, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What the hell is your problem? He was! Fact. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.196.5.102 (talk) 23:55, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

With regards to the editor you just blocked; I think he is working in tandem with a sock or meatie. Check out the contribs of ChipDAripper and Mpokorny08 (the editor you blocked). Looks stunningly similar. ~~<Edit conflict addition> & check out the user above. Reckon they all deserve the boot.~~ Baegis (talk) 23:59, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.

Replied. Thanks for the heads-up; I thought I read somewhere that while allowed, blanking warnings was discouraged. · AndonicO ^Hail! 00:23, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks again. Happy hunting to you too... beating me to too many reverts though. ;) · AndonicO ^Hail! 00:30, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:76.190.166.7

I'm having some problems with this IP continually introducing uncited information to various astrology articles. As you may have seen on his/her talk page, there have been repeated efforts to get them to cite their sources but they do not respond and simply continue. Any constructive advice? Pairadox (talk) 00:24, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ya know, communication is a virtue. While I realize you get a lot of flak for your efforts, you could at least acknowledge the legit questions. Pairadox (talk) 11:57, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

edits for John Haughm

I am correcting errors for a page about *me*. There is quite a bit of information that is wrong. Please tell me what is needed to prove my identity so that these changes will stay as I have made them.

J. Haughm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.193.141.189 (talk) 00:27, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oiiiiiiiiiii!!!!

Stop this you internet Nazi... just stop this nonesense and restore my comment about Claus Thomsen.

PS. There's something else I edited but you will never find it. Tee hee. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.196.5.102 (talk) 00:31, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AGAIN, you are adding back information that is incorrect!!!!

How is it vandalism if I am correcting info about MYSELF!!!! I plan to add corect information if you would STOP undoing all of my work!!!

Not to mention you have even undone my birth date which I entered!!!

Please respond!

J. Haughm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.193.141.189 (talk) 00:35, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That is fine. I thank you for keeping an eye out for such things and understand how mistakes such as this can be made.

If Wikipedia wants true information about my musical background, I will be happy to submit it myself. I will not tolerate, however, someone who knows little about me writing it on my behalf!

J. Haughm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.193.141.189 (talk) 00:43, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For reverting vandals faster than I! Chetblong^Talk_Sign 01:26, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 01:32, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No sources

I removed the parts of the article where no sources are provided. Please restore back my edits and please understand that what I did is not vandalism by any mean. Thank you --66.57.86.203 (talk) 02:03, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WHY ARE YOU ACTING LIKE A DICK??

I WRITE THE TRUTH. I AM A BETTER QUALIFIED TENNIS REORTER THAN ARE YOU, SIR. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.189.198.229 (talk) 02:07, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Motivo

Non essendo amministratore continui a minacciarmi senza motivo!!!! Un amministratore può bloccarmi non tu!!!!--PIO (talk) 13:44, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Il problema è che ho cercato il tuo soprannome, nella lista che sta nella relativa categoria degli amministratori, non trovandolo: dunque sono dubbioso, ma posso anche essermi sbagliato.--PIO (talk) 13:59, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Snow Wolf sucks!!

Italic text —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.123.211.174 (talk) 13:56, 22 January 2008 (UTC) [reply]

I concur. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cubz80 (talk • contribs) 16:47, 23 Jan 2008

Did you even look at my revert for Super Smash Bros Brawl?

I removed an entire section that had nothing but speculation and forum-esque comments. The very fact you forced me to remove it again makes me look bad on the history page but in the future please look at the actual posts you're reverting.--HeaveTheClay (talk) 16:10, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the top of the page:

This is not a forum for general discussion of Super Smash Bros. (series). Any such messages will be deleted. Please limit discussion to the suggestions on how to improve the content of this article.

Since the discussion is nothing but idle speculation which do not intend on improving the quality of the article then I am justified in removing those forum type of messages. --HeaveTheClay (talk) 16:16, 22 January 2008 (UTC)--HeaveTheClay (talk) 16:16, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strange Behavior

Is this a bot or something? Your revert of my edit to Assortative mixing makes zero sense: I removed a dead link, you revert, edit my talk page with a vandalism warning, and then revert your own edit to my talk page. And after all that Assortative mixing still has a dead link. Looking at your contribs you are either the fastest (and least careful) vandalism editor or a bot gone out of control. What's the deal here? Somewhat confused, Pugget (talk) 16:30, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, cleared up. I just hadn't seen this kind of anti-vandalism behavior before. Happy vandal hunting! Cheers, Pugget (talk) 16:41, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

YOU

YOU LICK HUGE COCK AND IU HOPE YOU DIE YOU PEICE OF SHIT —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pmess510 (talk • contribs) 18:20, 22 Jan 2008

Not vandalizing!

I'm not vandalizing. I'm adding a sentence with more informations plus a fair illustration of the subject. See here if you want. --86.67.47.68 (talk) 18:34, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Of course I accept your apologize! Thanks for your work and your understanding. --86.67.47.68 (talk) 07:14, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse Me

I Am Not Vandilising Pages I Am Adding TO THe NYUK Page I Did Not Remove Or Tamper The Already Posted Comment What IS The Problem Here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by XxRewindlabsxX (talk • contribs) 18:38, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot be accused of being intelligent or even mildly entertaining, but hey, at least I am noticed here - in contrast to my life IRL... :-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.91.25.155 (talk • contribs) 18:40, 22 Jan 2008

Anthony Pulis Page

You may want to actually read what is on there.

Claims of his father and him being incestious for a start.

I was trying to remove the rubbish people seem to have put on that page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.149.99.7 (talk) 18:57, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I can't win...

...you keep beating me to the revert! Good work! - Stephanie Daugherty (Triona) - Talk - Comment - 23:43, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bored

		The I'm Really Bored Barnstar
		Given to you because you are reverting all the vandalism faster than I am, and therefore have nothing to do except pass you out a barnstar. =D Malinaccier (talk) 00:44, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 00:45, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hiquestiones

Im sorrys i edites pages, how do u sees them so fast? im currious. How do u spot changes so quicklee. Can i help stop the vandaliaism to? English is not me original languaje sorry, —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wingstrong (talk • contribs) 00:47, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HEY YOU!!!

This is your only warning! Stop Beating Compwhizii to reverting Vandalism. Future defeats will result in a permanent block. Thank you :D Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 01:10, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

XD Well, I'm going off in minutes (I hope) :) Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 01:12, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

you undid my edits

1) i went to saint thomas, 2 speeches were about starwars 2) the drug topic was highly taboo and created more problem than good 3) why did you undo my post? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.151.102.137 (talk) 01:17, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for restoring my talk page so promptly after vandalism :)
Keep up the good work -- Boris Barowski (talk) 01:31, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Huggle?

What is this {{uw-huggle3}} you speak of here? --Kralizec! (talk) 01:59, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		In recognition of your tremendous anti-vandalism efforts, I award you with this barnstar. I have never seen the recent changes page almost half full of just 1 user reverting so much vandalism. Keep up the excellent work. :-) Lra drama 13:54, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks but I suspect I clogged it with a mass revert of a spammer ;-) Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 14:07, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page blanking

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to to User talk:136.2.1.101.

From WP:VAN "blanking one's own user talk page is specifically not prohibited". 136.8.152.13 (talk) 14:39, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you don't agree, but that's currently what the policy says. 136.8.152.13 (talk) 14:43, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Explained on the talk page. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 14:57, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, that was more helpful that merely having a reversion war. I stand corrected. 136.8.152.13 (talk) 15:03, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Buddy...

Calm down... didn't you have around 18k edits a couple of days ago? I'm seeing 24k now... :O · AndonicO ^Hail! 15:14, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

^{Wow... my role model... :)} Err... I mean, you're obsessed; take a break. :P · AndonicO ^Hail! 15:24, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, you edit wikipedia even when you watch films? Hehe, I make it sound bad... ;) · AndonicO ^Hail! 15:47, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wooo! I got 1412 edits on the 23rd! :D *checks Snow's contribs... sees a number with six zeroes* · AndonicO ^Hail! 00:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About 250 here, 500 here, 500 here, 500 here, 500 here, 500 here, 150 here. Doing the math, that would be around... 2400. 1000 more than I. :P · AndonicO ^Hail! 01:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

but

i'm not vandalizing.

stoop is widely used as slang, especially in my part of the country. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.92.207.153 (talk • contribs) 15:58, 23 Jan 2008

ok

can do. citing now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.92.207.153 (talk) 16:07, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dodgeball

Hello

I am the Creator / Commissioner of Big Apple Dodgeball in New York City. I added info about this new league in NYC but you deleted it. Please keep it in the Dodgeball Wiki page where it belongs along with the other great leagues listed.

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikimjm (talk • contribs) 18:54, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism?

I am curious as how anything I have done to te Cal Nichols page is vandalism...I made the page!

Mike oootside of edmonton (talk) 19:41, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've been looking at it too, and I am also puzzled by that notice. Could you please explain on the talk page? But I remind Mike that nobody owns a WP article. DGG (talk) 19:46, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Careful

Careful with those tools - not vandalism. PouponOnToast (talk) 20:48, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :)

Thanks for the comment on my talk page regarding the block/unbock request. It's always nice to see someone get your back. I appreciate it my friend. :) Jmlk 1 7 21:19, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

STFU

why did you revert my edit to the article "STFU". that was not vandalism. I changed the word 'Fuck' to the less vulgar 'Frick', and commented about it. Why are you people saying that anyone can edit - if you just revert everything back the way you like them? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.141.148.195 (talk) 23:31, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bubbleboy007

Thanks for resolving. Ros0709 (talk) 23:41, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for January 21st, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 4	21 January 2008	About the Signpost

Template:S-s Template:S-s Template:S-s Template:S-s Template:S-s Template:S-s Template:S-s Template:S-s


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 00:37, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

For reverting vandalism on my userpage! Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 00:44, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How was that vandelism. Those things i said were true. can u explain? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chazmoney3 (talk • contribs) 01:07, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gary D. Wright Elementary School

Not vandalism. User was requesting deletion for the second time. 70.57.146.73 (talk) 01:20, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Gonzalez edit War

I write to you asking for assistance in a matter involving a User:Griot repeated edits to the Matt Gonzalez page. After you reverted the page 19 minutes later Griot changed it back removing referenced info many users have attempted to include. For the last three years I've watched this user edit-war with numerous users over the article making repeated edits the information fought over is usually the same with numerous users restoring it or adding it on there own with griot siding for exclusion dispite the fact the information in question is both factual and referenced. The page has been protected before but he just returns as soon as protection ends and "out edits" the other users. These edits are never discussed by Griot on the talk page and the referenced information he removes has been requested several times on the talk page. The Grounds for exclusion are often too much detail but some of this detail is needed to expalin things for people living outside the San Francisco bay area. unfortunatly I don't have an account but that in no way removes the factual nature of the dispute. I have no idea if you can help if not at least Thanks for your time. 139.102.16.185 (talk) 05:33, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

UNPROFESSIONAL BEHAVIOUR

User talk:Mayalld and you self seem to display a knee jerk reactions that lack tack and simple politeness, it should be apparent to both of you “ADMINISRATORS” that I am new to Wikipedia and simply trying to communicate with you. But you obviously let your “Power” get the better of you.......sending level 2 warnings over "Vandalism?" please get real!!!

I DID NOT VANDALISE ANY PAGE it should have been apparent that I was trying to leave a message and simply posted it in the wrong place!

Mayllad said “post it at the Bottom of the page” which I did , and I did not delete any existing comments, Please go and look up the wikipedia definition of Vandalism……since you brought it up, and thet is no fqacilsty to add nenw coment o Mayllard page without editing the page and adding your new comment.

But that is not the issue here if AMERICAS NEXT TOP MODEL EXHISTS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America's_Next_Top_Model and is considered OK and 33 other international version also exist, why is ETHIOPIA’S NEXT TOP MODEL not ok? What is the difference? Miss ethiopia (talk) 09:58, 24 January 2008 (UTC) Miss Ethiopia[reply]