User talk:Michael pirrello

This is Michael pirrello's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lygaeus creticus has been accepted

Lygaeus creticus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 00:46, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation pages

Please note that on disambiguation pages like Ambidexter and Mansa, red-linked entries should always include a blue link to an article that also includes that red link (MOS:DABRED). And genus names should be italicized! Leschnei (talk) 14:33, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I corrected Ambidexter. Mansa looks to have been corrected already. Michael pirrello (talk) 17:19, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Alex Slater

Hello, Michael pirrello,

Thank you for creating Alex Slater.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for creating an article on this American entomologist. Unfortunately, the article needs more verifiable sources WP:VERIFY to establish its subject's notability per criteria for WP:NACADEMIC. Also, please note that translation from another Wikipedia page does not in and of itself establish notability per WP:HOWTRANS and needs to be supported by sufficient sources. Judging from a quick Google search, this individual might not yet meet notability criteria for WP:NACADEMIC but if you think otherwise, please make sure to improve the article as soon as possible. Otherwise, it might be proposed for deletion. Please let me know if you have any questions!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ppt91}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Ppt91 (talk) 23:00, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ppt91: I want to quickly allude to WP:NEXIST and indicate that I'm still working on this article as part of an larger effort to disambiguate the works of father James A. Slater and son Alex Slater, both entomologists in the same field, and flesh out the biography of the latter. Please see https://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/James_Alexander_Slater_II.Michael pirrello (talk) 23:53, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Michael pirrello. Thanks for your quick reply and explaining the situation. As I mentioned earlier, if you believe that sufficient sources exist to establish WP:NACADEMIC and WP:BLP (for which I only did a preliminary search to ensure I would not miss anything immediately obvious), then you're certainly welcome to make these improvements. However, please know that unless these additions are made fairly soon, the article might be draftified as part of the review process and to give you more time to address these issues. Please let me know if you have any questions and thanks for your contributions. Ppt91 (talk) 00:05, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]