Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Architect 134
Architect 134
Architect 134 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Architect 134/Archive.
This SPI case may involve cross-wiki abuse. Please consider reporting the results on Meta; checkusers can send an email to the interwiki checkuser mailing list if required.
A clerk or checkuser recommends that new socks in this case not receive tags per WP:DENY.
25 July 2024
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
Suspected sockpuppets
- Ambeskine (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
Not much to go on but the edits to Ed, Edd n Eddy this [[1]] 'zany hijinks'. 'Erected' here [[2]] and [[3]]
Obviously there are a large amount of socks to look through so I haven't noticed any other crossover.
User has been blocked already for other reasons. Knitsey (talk) 00:18, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- You'll be shocked to hear it's
Confirmed but there are 
No sleepers immediately visible. Sorry, that's not much help. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:51, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
