Jump to content

Talk:Murder of Seth Rich

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Acroterion (talk | contribs) at 16:45, 13 July 2024 (poor quality: hat, this isn't a forum for your dislike for the medi). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 19, 2016Articles for deletionNo consensus
September 15, 2016WikiProject approved revisionDiff to current version
October 4, 2016Articles for deletionNo consensus
January 21, 2017Articles for deletionSpeedily kept
February 26, 2017WikiProject approved revisionDiff to current version
May 30, 2017WikiProject approved revisionDiff to current version

poor quality

Not a forum for gripes about media coverage that you don't like
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

The amount of conjecture in this article is astounding. "3 websites say something is true, so that means something is true." Jawz101 (talk) 16:50, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jawz101, what are you referring to? Because if it's The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times and The Washington Post wrote that the promotion of these conspiracy theories was an example of fake news, those "3 websites" are reliable sources, which means it is verified content. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:00, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"If enough for-profit rags repeat the same trash, it's indisputably true." What a fucking nightmare. 73.193.109.117 (talk) 22:56, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you don't like the way mainstream media report news, then you need to get policy changed. TFD (talk) 16:30, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]