User talk:Natsuikomin

Committed identity: 859e02d28d3dce2f8fd412c2fde1dc28ffd99ba75e7a15d7980578cdd61db17a9694d933fcebb776b6840e24c19aeae86cdfdaf666e78d3688947833c4a4e26b is a SHA-512 commitment to this user's real-life identity.

If you have a conflict of interest, you must disclose the nature of that COI.==Reply==

Thanks for message.

If you have any conflict of interest regarding this game, you must declare it.

Also read the following regarding writing an article:

you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the game company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls

You have just one reference that suggests that the game will be released in the future. I don't know if Gamingonphone or Saurabh are reliable sources, but assuming that they are, there is absolutely no indication at all how it meets the notability criteria linked above. Just existing doesn't make a game notable, and a game that isn't even released yet is even less likely to meet the criteria. You give no indication of what awards it has won, or that it's part of a successful existing series

You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.

Your fact-free text appears to have no purpose other than to trail the game, which is basically promotional

There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

The preceding two bullet points are just for info, not suggesting you've done either of these.

You said Have you even read the reference I cited?. Yes

You said The weird thing is that seeing the quality of how you assessed the article, but you are given the right to delete a page on English Wikipedia If you believe I have acted inappropriately, you can go to WP:ANI Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:50, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You know what you're doing, but refused to solve it properly. I ended the case here now because the worse thing that could happen is you may block me for a false allegation. No reply regarding this will be responded, except that it urges more discussion and further investigation in the future, Thanks. Natsuinyerere (talk) 10:02, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:50, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]