User talk:Insight 3

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello Insight 3, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, some of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's Manual of Style, and have to be changed. Please familiarize yourself with the guidelines shown there. Edits that don't comply with these guidelines are changed to match what our MoS recommends. There's a great page about the Manual of Style that has tips on how to effectively write new articles. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can click here to ask a question on your talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. See also the Simplified Manual of Style. Here are a few more good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 11:17, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Insight 3! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:29, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Whpq and thanks for guiding me. As you can see I am new here and without images, the wiki pages look like a desert to me, so I couldn't resist to find ways to upload images legitimately. But now I do get what you are talking about and will keep it mind for the future. As for the contents, I think I quite understand the policy and try my best to properly paraphrase the sources. If you could point out where I was casual, then I will be more than obliged. Thanks again! Insight 3 (talk) 14:22, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above note is general guidance on copyright. The reason I posted this to your talk page was because of image copyright. -- Whpq (talk) 14:52, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting some article expansion help

Greetings,

Requesting your visit to article Draft:Aurats (word) and article Islamic advice literature and help expand the articles if you find topics interested in.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 07:36, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bookku Greetings and thanks for your message. If I find anything about the subjects you mentioned, I would be more than glad to contribute. Thanks again! Insight 3 (talk) 14:01, 25 September 2021 (UTC

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	I would like to encourage you in any way I can. I do like the Created Articles related to Pakistan by you so far. Wassalaam and Best Regards Ngrewal1 (talk) 01:10, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Editing Pakistani films

As a fellow editor, I am sharing some info with you here. In 2021, Cineplot.com went dead on us as well as Complete Index To World Film (C.I.T.W.F.) website. These were 2 reliable film websites that I used to rely on a lot. Now I try to use Pakistani newspapers as References as you do also. I just finished editing Dillagi that you created this year. I am sure you already know by now what I am going to say next? Red Wikipedia links attract unwanted attention from the Wikipedia Robot Checkers which I certainly don't want. So I often use the WIKIPEDIA SEARCH BOX on TOP, while still editing an article, to check the article title's CORRECT SPELLING TO AVOID GETTING RED LINKS later. For Example, if we start typing Mujeeb Alam in the Top Search Box, the fold-down list of Existing Wikipedia articles with that name will automatically SUGGEST to use Aalam as the correct spelling with two AAs. Best Regards Ngrewal1 (talk) 21:53, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I already Moved page Mujeeb Alam to the correct spellings we are all used to and which is how his name is spelled in most newspapers of Pakistan. I don't know why someone had spelled it with 2 AAs to begin with. Thanks...Ngrewal1 (talk) 00:53, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have never found Cineplot.com active, so I'm using Pakistan Film Magazine instead. I also get irritated with usual names and spellings in articles' titles and have moved some articles like Hakim Said, Aalamgir Haq, etc. Thanks very much for your info, hope you will continue sharing such valuable feedback. Insight 3 (talk) 06:05, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just some info

My Salaams. Thought I would share some info with you. Pakistan Today newspaper's existing references had been going dead on me for some months now. Of course I was concerned, guessing to myself that since the owner and veteran editor Arif Nizami had also died recently, my concern was that the newspaper might also fold eventually. To my pleasant surprise, I guess his son Babur Nizami is starting to change the articles' url paths to Archived url paths and the OLD URLs are automatically REDIRECTED to the NEW ARCHIVED URLs. It's your choice what you want to do in future with them. I myself COPY/PASTE the new ARCHIVED URL with the word 'archive' in it, when editing Wikipedia now. Ngrewal1 (talk) 00:09, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ngrewal1 Thanks, it is useful info. I have also an issue. I want to move the page Munawar Sultana to Munawar Sultana (actress) to disambiguate it from Munawar Sultana (singer) but I am unable to do that. Someone moved it before without leaving a redirect. Can you do that? Insight 3 (talk) 05:14, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I understand Wikipedia policy, it's not needed. You created Munawar Sultana (singer) and the other actress Munawar Sultana article has been there for some years. They already are differentiated. Ngrewal1 (talk) 17:18, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks. Please keep guiding me. Insight 3 (talk) 05:29, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Demi Rose Mawby

Hi, my brother, I just wanted to thank you personally for creating a page for Demi Rose Mawby. She was due to have a wiki page on herself a while back ago so again, I just want to thank you and be sure to have a good one. Abal126 (talk) 18:13, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. I just saw her name in an online article, "Celebrities Who Are Not On Wikipedia" and found it compelling to create a page for her. Let me know if you have some suggestions to improve it. Insight 3 (talk) 05:14, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, understood. Abal126 (talk) 07:11, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For all your contributions in the films and music categories. They certainly are very valuable additions to Wikipedia. Hope you continue and keep those creative juices flowing. Best Regards Ngrewal1 (talk) 23:30, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much again Ngrewal1! It is really encouraging. Insight 3 (talk) 03:02, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion In your travels over Wikipedia pages Insight 3, are you tired of seeing References going dead on you that you yourself gave a year or two ago? Anyway I am and I am starting to prefer and use Archived References over regular ones whenever I can – Archived from Wayback Machine. If you like, we can talk more about it via e-mail. Contact me at nisar.grewal@yahoo.com Ngrewal1 (talk) 18:07, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Hello Insight 3, thank you so much for inserting the cite in the Journalism career on the page I created Imran Riaz Khan today. I would appreciate it. 👍😁 MHassanAsif (talk) 20:10, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Insight 3

Thank you for creating Deebo Bhattacharya.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 01:23, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: Thanks sir! It was encouraging.Insight 3 (talk) 02:20, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Help for Enhancing articles

I have seen your articles, you have written very well. Your articles are mostly in the Start and Stub categories. My article is mostly in the un-known category so please guide and help me about it. I am waiting . Thank! Zimi09 (talk) 17:42, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your appreciation! As far as I have understood the assessment process, it is quite a subjective thing. According to some any article haveing less than 500 words should be assessed as "stub". I personally see when a subject lacks basic info (DOB, early life, etc), as your article Sajad Gul does, to create a proper infobox, then I declare it as stub. But you should keep asking other editors too.Insight 3 (talk) 03:00, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Will you help me for improving my articles?

I shall be very grateful to you. Thanks Zimi09 (talk) 11:24, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I will.Insight 3 (talk) 11:50, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

- Thanks! I hope I get to learn a lot from you.

So where and how do we have to start? Zimi09 (talk) 12:23, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The best way of learning is to keep creating new articles and let me know where you need advise.Insight 3 (talk) 14:59, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you and am creating new articles as well as improving the previous ones. Along creating more articles, I have to work harder on the previous articles so that they can get out of un-known category. Zimi09 (talk) 15:37, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at my article and talk to me about the mistakes I've made, so that we can fix those mistakes together. Zimi09 (talk) 15:43, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Unknown" category is no issue. While creating talk page of an article, use templates to assess it as stub or start. See your article Sajad Gul's talk page, I did it there, just change the titles and copy/paste those templates to all of your articles.Insight 3 (talk) 16:11, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Zimi09 (talk) 09:10, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another thing is that two articles one Bichoo (TV series) and the other Khurram Husain have been nominated for deletion by User:Ravensfire. I want your opinion on this and help to improve these articles. Zimi09 (talk) 09:26, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Film sources

Hi, I saw your message on WP:TEAHOUSE. Which film are you referring to? I have a newspapers.com account and used it to find sources for my article on the film The Brothers O'Toole; if you look, half of the sources are clippings from newspapers.com. I can see what can be found for the 1978 film you're interested in. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:07, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anachronist , thanks very much for your offer to help! But this is an Urdu film I am referring to and unfortunately old non-English newspapers have not been digitized like English newspapers. Thanks again! Insight 3 (talk) 16:31, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NewspaperArchive (which is also accessible to me) has newspapers in many languages, but unfortunately nothing from Pakistan. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:48, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes its challenging but thanks anyway! Insight 3 (talk) 17:12, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Grace Ofure AFD

Hello, Insight 3,

Have you thought about asking for this article to be drafified so you could continue to improve it in Draft space? Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:38, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Liz, thanks for your suggestion! Yes it would be better if it is draftified, but will not it need a consensus of other participants in AfD? Insight 3 (talk) 11:29, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thanks for finding the Lab-e-Mehran sources

— Ixtal ^{( T / C )} ⁂ Non nobis solum. 09:23, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ixtal for this cute little kitten! Insight 3 (talk) 11:41, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paid-contribution disclosure

My Upwork profile: https://www.upwork.com/freelancers/~01301727729fc9c76d?viewMode=1

I created following articles for payment:

Insight 3 (talk) 04:19, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Daastan Publishers logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Daastan Publishers logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Guddu (film archivist)

Hello Insight 3,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Guddu (film archivist) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Simon Peter Hughes (talk) 14:32, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luscious Cosmetics (October 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Scope creep was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Luscious Cosmetics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

scope_creep^Talk 09:17, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Insight 3! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! scope_creep^Talk 09:17, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luscious Cosmetics (November 1)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CNMall41 was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Nothing has changed since the last deletion discussion less than a month ago. Would recommend salting the draft and article mainspace so this behavior stops.

CNMall41 (talk) 19:35, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Afshan Ahmed for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Afshan Ahmed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afshan Ahmed until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 04:22, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Majid Jahangir for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Majid Jahangir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Majid Jahangir until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

M.Ashraf333 (talk) 13:49, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sargent (film)

The article Sargent (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM No reviews cited or found in a BEFORE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 00:17, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sargent (film) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sargent (film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, and there is currently one. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:11, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Nigar Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abid Ali.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Abdus Salam (newscaster)'s award year

User:Insight 3... Hope you are doing well. Wanted to first ask you about his Pride of Performance award year info, since you are the article creator. To stay consistent, we are all trying to follow Wikipedia guidelines and the past practices regarding Pakistani articles on Wikipedia. To the best of my knowledge, his award was announced on 14 August 1993 (awarded posthumously according to your source Tareekh-e-Pakistan, and by the way that's the only source that mentions any date for the award, not even Dawn newspaper source mentions it). By now, you already know that I have read your created article? As we all know, Pakistani PP awards are announced on our Independence Day and then actually awarded on Youm-e-Pakistan (Pakistan Day - 23 March the next year). This should make 1994 the actual year that he received the award? I am making all this effort so we all STAY CONSISTENT on Wikipedia. I am trying to work with you as a team and consult with you first before making any changes on my own. Please REPLY here on your Talk page. My sincere thanks for all your work on Wikipedia. Ngrewal1 (talk) 00:17, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your input User:Ngrewal1, I think it was an award for the year 1993, that's why it was already mentioned under the 1993 awards. The announcement year should be considered the award year, not the ceremony year. Also, we have no source anyway to tell who on the behalf of the deceased newscaster received the award in March 1994. Insight 3 (talk) 04:47, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmad Ali Saaien

Hi Insight 3. You're doing brilliant work. Can you help translate/publish an article about a major Hindko poet, Ahmad Ali Saayein (ur:احمد_علی_سائیں). There is a lot of coverage, like [1], [2]. Thanks. 2400:ADC1:468:400:C488:6D72:FEAA:632E (talk) 14:47, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will create it. Just give me some time. Insight 3 (talk) 16:11, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! 2400:ADC1:468:400:C488:6D72:FEAA:632E (talk) 15:14, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sheba Hasan

Hi Insight 3. You done a great work on several articles that you have made and i really love it. Can you make article of Sheba Hasan. She worked in some dramas also on stage dramas and is the niece of Farida Khanum. I will also help add some information in it.(2400:ADCC:105:2200:40DE:D5A2:4706:8BC4 (talk) 16:17, 11 February 2023 (UTC))[reply]

Wow didn't know "Chandi" still doesn't have a wikipage! But unfortunately I couldn't find enough sources for her, in fact, not a single one. Did she receive any award for Sona Chandi? Insight 3 (talk) 17:14, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok here are some dramas that I found of her. She got ptv award for best actress for her role in Sona Chandi. Some sources Urdu news. I found some sources from books about her. I can add it to the article.

Damad Jokar Pokar Ahsas Aur Kamtari Dareechay Dastaan-e-Habib Keh Jaaan Mein Koon as Nazeera Abba Bel as Nagina

Any online link to her PTV Award? Insight 3 (talk) 04:06, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was mentioned in a old magazine TV Times called Interview with Sheba Hasan the magazine was published by PTV in 1983. It can be added to the article.(2400:ADCC:105:2200:44FE:B1E3:7041:2E4B (talk) 19:20, 14 February 2023 (UTC))[reply]

Ok I try to make a draft. But better if you could share screenshots of that magazine on the talk page, because sources for her are not enough and her notability will solely rely on that award. Insight 3 (talk) 04:03, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the draft: Draft:Sheeba Hassan. Insight 3 (talk) 04:45, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for the help. I added sources to the article from books and newspaper.(2400:ADCC:105:2200:6077:8BF1:CA1E:1319 (talk) 17:09, 15 February 2023 (UTC))[reply]

Yes, sources are satisfactory now. Can you mention the page number of TV Times Magazine? Insight 3 (talk) 17:12, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I will add right now. Sorry must have not noticed it earlier.(2400:ADCC:105:2200:6077:8BF1:CA1E:1319 (talk) 17:17, 15 February 2023 (UTC))[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charlie Ottley has been accepted

Charlie Ottley, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Newystats (talk) 11:07, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aj Diyan Kurrian for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aj Diyan Kurrian is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aj Diyan Kurrian until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

// Timothy :: talk 09:39, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sargent (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sargent (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sargent (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Twinkle1990 (talk) 13:28, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Share your thoughts, please!

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 180.200.221.5 (talk) 13:58, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking notice of the matter! Insight 3 (talk) 15:29, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sargent (film)/Pakistani sources

Hello, In a recent Afd, (which was closed, hence my reply here), you comment on my !vote as follows:You seem to have very poor knowledge of Pakistani sources. See WP:PKRS for reliable and unreliable sources.

My reply to your very harsh remark is: Sorry, what? The page you kindly directed me to mentions the Daily Jang as generally reliable. But by all means, use your extremely great knowledge (or shall I say omniscience?) of Pakistani sources to improve the page.— MY, OH MY! (mushy yank) — 19:32, 16 June 2023 (UTC) My apologies for this angry outburst, I realise that your comment was not about my !vote but about the nomination. Very sorry.— MY, OH MY! (mushy yank) — 19:36, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Glad that you realized sooner. Happy editing! Insight 3 (talk) 03:10, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Imran Khan

Hello, I'm SahafatKaLover18. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Imran Khan have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks.

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Additionally WP:ARBBLP may also apply. Discussing at the article talk page as per WP:DR is most preferable way for sorting out content related disagreement. The good thing you seem to be already at the article talk page. This intimation is just to keep you informed so that will help you to avoid heat of moment situations and help follow Wikipedia policies as applicable. Wish you happy editing. Cheers. Bookku (talk) 05:31, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Your passion for music comes through in your edits and work on Wikipedia. Wish you the best Ngrewal1 (talk) 16:50, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks bro! Insight 3 (talk) 17:24, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stephen Ogweno has been accepted

Stephen Ogweno, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OLI 19:32, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Ogweno moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Stephen Ogweno. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and Nothing in this draft says that the subject is other than a WP:ROTM health professional. I have moved it back to Draft in order to give the creator and interested parties the chance to work on it in peace and quiet, rather than be subjected to the rigours of WP:AFD. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:08, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 17:05, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Insight 3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Okay, I made a mistake of creating other account and edited pages that I had edited previously from this account, but my intentions were not bad, neither my edits were abusive. Looking at my contributions, I think I deserve a second chance. I promise not to make any other mistake again.Insight 3 (talk) 10:47, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Okay, I made a mistake of creating other account and edited pages that I had edited previously from this account, but my intentions were not bad, neither my edits were abusive. Looking at my contributions, I think I deserve a second chance. I promise not to make any other mistake again.[[User:Insight 3|Insight 3]] ([[User talk:Insight 3#top|talk]]) 10:47, 6 November 2023 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Okay, I made a mistake of creating other account and edited pages that I had edited previously from this account, but my intentions were not bad, neither my edits were abusive. Looking at my contributions, I think I deserve a second chance. I promise not to make any other mistake again.[[User:Insight 3|Insight 3]] ([[User talk:Insight 3#top|talk]]) 10:47, 6 November 2023 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Okay, I made a mistake of creating other account and edited pages that I had edited previously from this account, but my intentions were not bad, neither my edits were abusive. Looking at my contributions, I think I deserve a second chance. I promise not to make any other mistake again.[[User:Insight 3|Insight 3]] ([[User talk:Insight 3#top|talk]]) 10:47, 6 November 2023 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Insight 3 (talk) 10:47, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]