Talk:Receptor theory

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Pharmacology B‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Molecular Biology: MCB / Cell Signaling B‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is within the scope of the Cell Signaling task force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Created page

Created page on receptor theory think it will make a nice addition to wikipedia will be writing it over the coming weeks Lilypink 21:00, 1 November 2007 (UTC) please feel free to make comments on this topic here[reply]

Re: Definition of receptor theory this is what i think it is so far from what I read on the topic but if you think you have a better one change it. Lilypink 20:18, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Ternary complex model - There is an acronym (ATCM) floating around with no definition earlier in the article - may be worth a clear up AbiF95 (talk) 12:00, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I fear that some of the history in this article is wrong. And it refers mostly to GPCR, in which it is still impossible to fit models and estimate their parameters. It should refer also to ligand-gated ion channels because they are still the only system in which it is possible to fit mechanisms to observations and to estimate all the free parameters (transition rate constants). That makes it possible to compare postulated mechanisms in a proper quantitative way. David Colquhoun (talk) 15:12, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New section on Receptor Theory in Immunology

CPDeLisi has added a new section called Receptor theory in Immunology. I dispute that the material should be included, because it does not appear relevant to the current article. Specifically, the article's topic appears to be about a hypothesis held during the early 20th century regarding pharmacology, and the mechanisms of drug / cell interaction. The term "receptor theory" appears very much to refer to the hypothesis that existed prior to the actual understanding of the bioichemical processes involved. On the other hand, the new section appears to concern itself with advances in the biochemistry that occurred in the 1960s and 1970s, after the "Receptor theory" had been validated and the since had moved on to simply study receptors. I invite CPDeLisi (or any other interested editor) to discuss the matter to decide whether the new material should be retained and improved, or simply removed as not relevant to the present topic. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:51, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@CPDeLisi: No response? WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:44, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently CPDeLisi does not choose to defend his addition, so I will again remove it. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:41, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]