User talk:Blissfulbeing

Welcome!

Hi Blissfulbeing! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Fragrant Peony (talk) 08:39, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DS Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Victor Schmidt (talk) 07:57, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 15:09, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Defense

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Blissfulbeing (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Im not a sockpuppet, im here to improve the online project, you can see the history of my edits for evidence, i always edit from a single account and have fixed isp, if you want you can check my ip, i was also not given a chance to defend myself in the sockpuppet investigation, please unblock me Blissfulbeing (talk) 15:15, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your chance to defend yourself is now. Note that as stated at WP:CHECKUSER, "On some Wikimedia projects, an editor's IP addresses may be checked upon their request, typically to prove innocence against a sockpuppet allegation. Such checks are not allowed on the English Wikipedia and such requests will not be granted." Please also read about meat puppetry. 331dot (talk) 18:29, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Well, I have to admit that I was curious. The last two socks of AuthenticSources2546 that I blocked were on a different IP range and using a different smartphone. However, it looks like you're in the same city as them. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:40, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Believe me im not a sockpuppet in fact immidiately after this block happened i emailed arbitration committee from my official email account from which i created my account there they provided me with a link to wiki utrs, ive also registered an appeal there, i am here to improve the online project and such block that too connecting me to an unknown account is having a toll on my mental health, i suffer from depression and being falsely accused is just ruining the situation. I am innocent and i am ready to provide you with any details you want to prove my innocence but please unblock me im not a sockpuppet and im not here to disrupt the project.Blissfulbeing (talk) 21:36, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is very reminiscent of the comments at User talk:Liontiger250 after being blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:51, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

First and foremost i dont even know the account that you are referring to and ive never even seen this account until now, if you want check my isp or ip and compare it with others and if needed im also ready to provide my email address for further investigation, i repeat im innocent and not a sockpuppet.Blissfulbeing (talk) 21:57, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not a sockpuppet and this is my only account from which i edit, check my edit history from the very start, ive always tried to improve the articles based on wiki policies and have never disrupted the online project in any way.Blissfulbeing (talk) 22:25, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i am innocent

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Blissfulbeing (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet and this is the only account i've used, i'm being connected to an unknown account, i have a fixed isp from which i edit, all of my edits from the very start have been done with my fixed isp, i am here to improve the online project and not disrupt it, i suffer from mental health issues and being wrongly accused of something that i have not done is affecting my well being, im innocent, please unblock meBlissfulbeing (talk) 23:03, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A simple disavowal is unfortunately not enough at this time. At this time, the standard offer is likely your best route to getting your account unblocked. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 02:53, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikipedia is not therapy. If you have mental health issues like depression, please seek help from a qualified medical professional in your area. Taking care of yourself should be your top priority, not Wikipedia editing. 331dot (talk) 23:40, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am falsely accused of something that i've not done, i have always tried to improve the articles in Wikipedia, please help i am not a sockpuppet and i have never disrupted Wikipedia by any means.Blissfulbeing (talk) 23:46, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not a sock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Blissfulbeing (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am not a sock, check my ip, isp and the history of my edits to confirm whether i am a sock or not, it's been a week since i edited Wikipedia, almost all of my edits are constructive and have been done to improve the online project, i've done nothing wrong and my account is blocked on false accusation, please unblock me. Blissfulbeing (talk) 06:23, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Again, "On some Wikimedia projects, an editor's IP addresses may be checked upon their request, typically to prove innocence against a sockpuppet allegation. Such checks are not allowed on the English Wikipedia and such requests will not be granted." If all you can say is "I'm not a sock", there is nothing else we can do for you until you observe the standard offer as noted. 331dot (talk) 09:11, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Blissfulbeing (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me, throughout my edit history i've never violated any of the Wikipedia policies and have tried to improve the online project. All of my edits are constructive and have been done with an intent to improve the articles. Blissfulbeing (talk) 17:28, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Just saying "I'm not a sock" over and over is not going to get you unblocked. As your talk page access has been revoked, you will need to go to UTRS to request an unblock. Please bear in mind however that you will to give reasoning for your unblock more than "I'm not a sock". RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:28, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have revoked TPA for the user's repetitive unblock requests and clear case of WP:IDHT.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:38, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]