Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig gier
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 05:54, 6 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 05:54, 6 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:53, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Craig gier (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
A non-notable local political activist in Portland. Only two fairly minor GoogleNews hits[1]. Fails WP:BIO Nsk92 (talk) 15:15, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — no evidence of notability, and no references. macytalk 16:44, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- don't delete keep this page. check here [2]and here [3] also here [4] gee that looks like more than two hits to me. maybe someone didn't check more than a second.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Godofzelda (talk • contribs)
- These are plain searches from Google, Yahoo and Alltheweb, and without putting the name in quotation marks at that. Of course, you are going to get a phone book of hits this way. If there are any sources that qualify as independent reliable sources, per WP:V and WP:RS, you are welcome to fish them out and add them to the article. The standard search used in these cases is a GoogleNews search (for all dates), with the name of the subject in quotation marks. This search gives two hits[5]. A similar Yahoo News search produces no hits at all[6]. Nsk92 (talk) 02:10, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. — Nsk92 (talk) 12:22, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:22, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete - no assertion of notability. Bearian (talk) 18:15, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.