Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alaleh Alamir
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 05:57, 5 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 05:57, 5 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. (Additional reference: OTRS 2013011710010323) Daniel (talk) 17:52, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Alaleh Alamir (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nominate for deletion Tagged for notability for over 5 years. Doesn't seem to meet notability criteria. Boleyn (talk)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 20:22, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Clearly a working and exhibiting artist, but no evidence that she meets the WP:ARTIST criteria at this stage in her career. (Were she a Fellow at the Royal British Society of Sculptors that would move towards the criteria but being one of around 500 Associates doesn't.) AllyD (talk) 20:52, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 11:56, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 11:56, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom , unreliable refrences, notability not established. Spada II ♪♫ (talk) 14:30, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per the above; subject does not (yet!) appear to be notable. That said, the usual caveats apply. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 16:09, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.