Talk:MeidasTouch

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the MeidasTouch article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Template:WikiProject Donald Trump

Template:WikiProject Joe Biden

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Media Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mackay Radio
Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

United States: Presidential elections Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections.

The Rolling Stone article is a opinion article with bias and should not be included in the "Timeline" category

@2600:8805:C980:9400:B519:21BC:C1D0:9F0F: If you want to add the Rolling Stone article to the page, create a "Criticism" category and collect some articles criticizing Medias Touch. The article does not belong in the Timeline category. Eliegot (talk) 22:31, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide sources that disprove the article thanks2600:8805:C980:9400:B519:21BC:C1D0:9F0F (talk) 01:28, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell me your thoughts on moving the the article to a "Criticism" section? Eliegot (talk) 01:36, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fine with me2600:8805:C980:9400:1C2E:831F:CAEE:8765 (talk) 02:55, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relliable Sourcees

I have not seen anyone dispute the validity of the article so why is this locked? 2600:8805:C980:9400:1C2E:831F:CAEE:8765 (talk) 02:50, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your behavior of edit warring is the reason. Conflicts on Wikipedia are resolved through discussion. The onus is not on one particular party in a conflict to discuss and cease reverting, but on all parties (in particular, the rule is not "it's the other person's fault for not discussing"). Comments like this focus on contributor, not content, and are therefore counterproductive. — Bilorv (talk) 20:07, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How am I edit warring with reliable information? It's a reliable source.2600:8805:C980:9400:7D81:9DCC:7EB7:3962 (talk) 00:46, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unlock

Thanks