User contributions for 216.164.249.213
Appearance
Results for 216.164.249.213 talk block log logs global block log filter log
21 July 2022
- 10:3910:39, 21 July 2022 diff hist +393 Talk:Your Lie in April →oda: new section Tag: New topic
- 10:3410:34, 21 July 2022 diff hist +3 Your Lie in April fixing typo
- 10:3110:31, 21 July 2022 diff hist −1 Akira Toriyama that->who Tag: Reverted
- 10:3010:30, 21 July 2022 diff hist −9 Akira Toriyama less convoluted wording Tag: Reverted
- 03:4803:48, 21 July 2022 diff hist +228 Talk:Asian Games →discontinuation of board games: new section Tag: New topic
20 July 2022
- 09:4409:44, 20 July 2022 diff hist +368 Talk:Ballade No. 1 (Chopin) →your lie in april citation: new section Tag: New topic
18 July 2022
- 05:5405:54, 18 July 2022 diff hist −7 Levan Saginashvili changing this back with the precedent on marion tinsley's article
- 05:5205:52, 18 July 2022 diff hist +641 Levan Saginashvili undoing with source
- 05:4805:48, 18 July 2022 diff hist +131 Talk:Scott Aaronson →entire early life/education section written like a self advertisement: Reply Tag: Reply
- 04:4204:42, 18 July 2022 diff hist +1,628 Talk:Scott Aaronson →entire early life/education section written like a self advertisement: Reply Tag: Reply
- 04:4004:40, 18 July 2022 diff hist +198 Talk:Church of Scientology →celebs: new section Tag: New topic
16 July 2022
- 05:3405:34, 16 July 2022 diff hist +196 Talk:Claude Bloodgood →rating: new section Tag: New topic
- 05:2905:29, 16 July 2022 diff hist −23 Talk:Scott Aaronson →entire early life/education section written like a self advertisement
- 05:2905:29, 16 July 2022 diff hist +252 Talk:Scott Aaronson →entire early life/education section written like a self advertisement: Reply Tag: Reply
- 05:0905:09, 16 July 2022 diff hist +209 Talk:Howie Mandel →Why?: new section Tag: New topic
15 July 2022
- 22:3822:38, 15 July 2022 diff hist 0 Your Lie in April this is wrong, so im changing it
- 22:3522:35, 15 July 2022 diff hist +6 Your Lie in April clarity
11 July 2022
- 16:2316:23, 11 July 2022 diff hist +203 Talk:World population milestones →when were the USCB projections?: new section Tag: New topic
30 June 2022
- 02:3602:36, 30 June 2022 diff hist 0 Rick Boogs No edit summary
20 June 2022
- 22:1022:10, 20 June 2022 diff hist +72 Talk:Cheating in chess →needs expansion: new section
19 June 2022
- 15:3515:35, 19 June 2022 diff hist +43 Talk:Stockfish (chess) →Glaurung: new section
12 June 2022
- 04:3004:30, 12 June 2022 diff hist +112 Talk:Matt Stonie →article length/importance: new section
1 June 2022
- 19:0919:09, 1 June 2022 diff hist +198 Talk:Cus D'Amato →muhammad ali: new section
17 May 2022
- 05:3305:33, 17 May 2022 diff hist +193 Talk:Arthur Gunn →Season 19: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
15 May 2022
- 01:1001:10, 15 May 2022 diff hist 0 Levan Saginashvili grammar
- 01:0901:09, 15 May 2022 diff hist −12 Levan Saginashvili he has lost one round of one match 1 time in the past 5 years and has improved considerably since then, there is no reason to use this weasel language. marion tinsley, who was far less dominant in his discipline, is described as being the greatest checkers player outright on his article
18 April 2022
- 17:5217:52, 18 April 2022 diff hist −91 Ken Shamrock he is not considered one of the greatest fighters of all time by literally anyone
16 April 2022
- 10:4710:47, 16 April 2022 diff hist +88 Talk:Hans Niemann →hyperlink: new section
30 March 2022
- 14:5714:57, 30 March 2022 diff hist +47 Talk:Andrew Tang →citation 1 url is dead: new section
27 March 2022
- 05:0905:09, 27 March 2022 diff hist −23 Claude Bloodgood he was a ~1400 strength player with the second highest rating in the US
20 February 2022
- 17:0117:01, 20 February 2022 diff hist +81 Talk:Jacob Collier →.: new section Tag: Reverted
7 February 2022
6 February 2022
- 09:2009:20, 6 February 2022 diff hist +165 Talk:Shroud (gamer) →article length: new section
- 09:1209:12, 6 February 2022 diff hist +266 Talk:Cheese (speedrunner) →relevance: new section
- 09:1009:10, 6 February 2022 diff hist +101 Talk:Scott Aaronson →entire early life/education section written like a self advertisement: new section
7 January 2022
- 09:4909:49, 7 January 2022 diff hist −2 Tal Baron formatting
- 09:4909:49, 7 January 2022 diff hist +291 Tal Baron reverted the removal of the cheating entry, reason for removal was weird and wrong
5 January 2022
- 23:0323:03, 5 January 2022 diff hist +892 Talk:Boy or girl paradox →There is no ambiguity
- 07:5907:59, 5 January 2022 diff hist 0 Compilation of Final Fantasy VII the score listed was not the aggregate score
17 December 2021
- 21:5521:55, 17 December 2021 diff hist −8,660 Boy or girl paradox reinstating my edit again as the question does not leave any room for interpretation. if you would like an official citation feel free to ask some math phds Tags: Manual revert Reverted
13 December 2021
- 23:5023:50, 13 December 2021 diff hist +991 Talk:Boy or girl paradox →There is no ambiguity
- 23:4123:41, 13 December 2021 diff hist −8,660 Boy or girl paradox reinstating my edit. the sources listed are not sources, they are psychologists who have not studied math. i have studied math, and i also gave my complete explanation for why there is no ambiguity in the problem (if there was, Q1 would be ambiguous as well.) if needed, we can produce PhD sources, who will say the same thing, but that shouldn't be necessary. there is a fine line between requiring users to cite their claims, and reporting pure pseudoscience. Tags: Manual revert Reverted
11 December 2021
- 11:5111:51, 11 December 2021 diff hist +2 Talk:Boy or girl paradox →There is no ambiguity
- 11:4811:48, 11 December 2021 diff hist +834 Talk:Boy or girl paradox →There is no ambiguity: new section
- 11:3811:38, 11 December 2021 diff hist −694 Boy or girl paradox deleting more misinformation about nonexistent ambiguity Tag: Reverted
- 11:3711:37, 11 December 2021 diff hist −798 Boy or girl paradox deleting more misinformation about nonexistent ambiguity Tags: Reverted section blanking
- 11:3611:36, 11 December 2021 diff hist −3,207 Boy or girl paradox deleting more misinformation about nonexistent ambiguity Tags: Reverted section blanking
- 11:3511:35, 11 December 2021 diff hist −3,153 Boy or girl paradox deleting more misinormation about the ambiguity which does not exist Tags: Reverted section blanking
10 December 2021
- 11:2511:25, 10 December 2021 diff hist −1,042 Boy or girl paradox putting my valid edit back Tags: Manual revert Reverted references removed
- 11:1511:15, 10 December 2021 diff hist −1,042 Boy or girl paradox there is absolutely nothing ambiguous about the question: of sets of 2 siblings, where at least 1 is male, the probability that the other is male is 1/3 (MM, MF, FM.) the idea that there is any ambiguity is a lie made up by people who dont understand probability Tags: Reverted references removed