Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Istituto San Leone Magno: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Added comment
Line 14: Line 14:
*'''Keep''' Huh, I searched in Italian and found a lot more: [https://roma.repubblica.it/cronaca/2016/03/24/news/san_leone_magno_storie_di_mala_educacio_n-136243098/] [https://roma.repubblica.it/cronaca/2016/03/29/news/_la_rivoluzione_al_san_leone_magno_quando_la_scuola_apri_alle_ragazze_-136515014/] including what I believe is a speech from the Pope: [http://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/it/speeches/1989/november/documents/hf_jp-ii_spe_19891105_istituto-s-leone-magno.html] [https://www.raoulwallenberg.net/news/the-istituto-san-leone-magno-of-rome-has-been-officially-proclaimed-house-of-life/] [https://romah24.com/trieste-salario/news/allistituto-san-leone-magno-si-potra-donare-il-sangue-ecco-quando-2-2-2-2-2-2/] Have to run, but there's more. [[User:SportingFlyer|SportingFlyer]] ''<span style="font-size:small; vertical-align:top;">[[User talk:SportingFlyer|T]]</span>''·''<span style="font-size:small; vertical-align:bottom;">[[Special:Contributions/SportingFlyer|C]]</span>'' 11:41, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' Huh, I searched in Italian and found a lot more: [https://roma.repubblica.it/cronaca/2016/03/24/news/san_leone_magno_storie_di_mala_educacio_n-136243098/] [https://roma.repubblica.it/cronaca/2016/03/29/news/_la_rivoluzione_al_san_leone_magno_quando_la_scuola_apri_alle_ragazze_-136515014/] including what I believe is a speech from the Pope: [http://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/it/speeches/1989/november/documents/hf_jp-ii_spe_19891105_istituto-s-leone-magno.html] [https://www.raoulwallenberg.net/news/the-istituto-san-leone-magno-of-rome-has-been-officially-proclaimed-house-of-life/] [https://romah24.com/trieste-salario/news/allistituto-san-leone-magno-si-potra-donare-il-sangue-ecco-quando-2-2-2-2-2-2/] Have to run, but there's more. [[User:SportingFlyer|SportingFlyer]] ''<span style="font-size:small; vertical-align:top;">[[User talk:SportingFlyer|T]]</span>''·''<span style="font-size:small; vertical-align:bottom;">[[Special:Contributions/SportingFlyer|C]]</span>'' 11:41, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
::You can't seriously tell me that your using the Pope writing them a letter as an indicator that they are notable -[[hysterical laughter emoji]]-. --[[User:Adamant1|Adamant1]] ([[User talk:Adamant1|talk]]) 23:22, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
::You can't seriously tell me that your using the Pope writing them a letter as an indicator that they are notable -[[hysterical laughter emoji]]-. --[[User:Adamant1|Adamant1]] ([[User talk:Adamant1|talk]]) 23:22, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
:::That's not my argument. My argument is that there's enough sources out there to make a [[WP:GNG]] pass, and since the discussion so far has been about how the article fails [[WP:GNG]], and specifically about how "there are zero newspaper sources online," I'm demonstrating that the school has been discussed significantly. The fact the Pope has taken notice of the school isn't a notability determinant, but is certainly helpful. [[User:SportingFlyer|SportingFlyer]] ''<span style="font-size:small; vertical-align:top;">[[User talk:SportingFlyer|T]]</span>''·''<span style="font-size:small; vertical-align:bottom;">[[Special:Contributions/SportingFlyer|C]]</span>'' 09:37, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:37, 25 October 2020

Istituto San Leone Magno (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This secondary school doesn't seem notable since the article only cites a single primary source and I was unable to find the multiple in-depth, non-trivial, reliable sources about it in a WP:BEFORE that it would need to pass either WP:GNG or WP:NORG. Plus, secondary schools are not inherently notable per the RfC about it. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:45, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:37, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:37, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • My understanding is that secondary schools are inherently notable, if their existence is substantiated. Also, only "unduly self-serving [or] an exceptional claim(s)" should have been deleted from the article, as per WP:SELFSOURCE Jzsj (talk) 01:38, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nope. Otherwise I wouldn't have said they aren't. Read WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Specifically bullet point 3 "secondary schools are not presumed to be notable simply because they exist." I'm not sure what second point is in refrence to. As I didn't delete anything from the article, unduly self-serving or otherwise. I don't think my nomination comment had anything to do with the deletion of content in the article either. Adamant1 (talk) 05:29, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You can't seriously tell me that your using the Pope writing them a letter as an indicator that they are notable -hysterical laughter emoji-. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:22, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That's not my argument. My argument is that there's enough sources out there to make a WP:GNG pass, and since the discussion so far has been about how the article fails WP:GNG, and specifically about how "there are zero newspaper sources online," I'm demonstrating that the school has been discussed significantly. The fact the Pope has taken notice of the school isn't a notability determinant, but is certainly helpful. SportingFlyer T·C 09:37, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]