Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ebène State Secondary School (Boys): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m unsigned
Vote via XFD voting tool
Line 9: Line 9:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Mauritius|list of Mauritius-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Spiderone|<span style="color: #996600">Spiderone</span>]] 14:53, 21 October 2020 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Mauritius|list of Mauritius-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Spiderone|<span style="color: #996600">Spiderone</span>]] 14:53, 21 October 2020 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Education|list of Education-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Shellwood|Shellwood]] ([[User talk:Shellwood|talk]]) 14:59, 21 October 2020 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Education|list of Education-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Shellwood|Shellwood]] ([[User talk:Shellwood|talk]]) 14:59, 21 October 2020 (UTC)</small>
* '''Delete''': The article does not pass GNG or NORG. BEFORE showed only sparse routine run of the mill local coverage, nothing that establishes notability. The single reference in the article does not meet [[WP:IS]] or [[WP:SIGCOV]]. <span style="font-family:Courier New, Courier, monospace;"><strong>&nbsp;&nbsp;//&nbsp;[[User:TimothyBlue|Timothy]]&nbsp;::&nbsp;</strong>[[User talk:TimothyBlue|<strong>talk</strong>]]&nbsp;</span> 22:59, 21 October 2020 (UTC) <!--VCB TimothyBlue-->

Revision as of 22:59, 21 October 2020

Ebène State Secondary School (Boys) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I did a PROD on this due to it's lack of nobility that unfortunately was removed because "secondary schools." When secondary schools are not inherently notable per NORG and SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Something the person who removed the PROD seemed to have ignored. So, here we are. What it comes down to is this lacks the multiple in-depth reliable sources it would need to pass either the general notability guidelines or the ones for organizations. Just to repeat, secondary schools are not inherently notable per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Therefore, the discussion should be in relation to the notability guidelines and the quality of sourcing (or lack thereof). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamant1 (talkcontribs) 14:47, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 14:52, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mauritius-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 14:53, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:59, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]