Talk:Argumentum ad populum: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:Argumentum ad populum/Archives/2017. (BOT) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Argumentum ad populum/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}} |
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Argumentum ad populum/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}} |
||
{{Photo requested|human behavior}} |
{{Photo requested|human behavior}} |
||
== Inverse == |
|||
Is there an inverse fallacy to Argumentum ad populam (for example, someone claims that 'everyone else believes x, therefore y must be true', I'm thinking along the lines of conspiracy theorists or people who don't trust common consensus)? -[[User:Albrozdude|albrozdude]] ([[User talk:Albrozdude|talk]]) 19:50, 22 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
: yes: Argument from fallacy: assumes that if an argument for some conclusion is fallacious, then the conclusion is false [[Special:Contributions/78.22.129.53|78.22.129.53]] ([[User talk:78.22.129.53|talk]]) 22:09, 27 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:: Indeed fallacies only mean the reasoning was false, meaning that the belief itself isn't justified. But then people have a stronger aptitude to follow a majority or statement from an authority. --[[Special:Contributions/105.4.189.71|105.4.189.71]] ([[User talk:105.4.189.71|talk]]) 14:13, 14 September 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:26, 14 September 2020
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Argumentum ad populum article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Categories:
- All unassessed articles
- C-Class Marketing & Advertising articles
- Mid-importance Marketing & Advertising articles
- WikiProject Marketing & Advertising articles
- C-Class Philosophy articles
- Mid-importance Philosophy articles
- C-Class logic articles
- Mid-importance logic articles
- Logic task force articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Mid-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Wikipedia requested images of human behavior