Jump to content

Talk:Argumentum ad populum: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
ClueBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:Argumentum ad populum/Archives/2017. (BOT)
Line 7: Line 7:
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Argumentum ad populum/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}}
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Argumentum ad populum/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}}
{{Photo requested|human behavior}}
{{Photo requested|human behavior}}

== Inverse ==

Is there an inverse fallacy to Argumentum ad populam (for example, someone claims that 'everyone else believes x, therefore y must be true', I'm thinking along the lines of conspiracy theorists or people who don't trust common consensus)? -[[User:Albrozdude|albrozdude]] ([[User talk:Albrozdude|talk]]) 19:50, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
: yes: Argument from fallacy: assumes that if an argument for some conclusion is fallacious, then the conclusion is false [[Special:Contributions/78.22.129.53|78.22.129.53]] ([[User talk:78.22.129.53|talk]]) 22:09, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
:: Indeed fallacies only mean the reasoning was false, meaning that the belief itself isn't justified. But then people have a stronger aptitude to follow a majority or statement from an authority. --[[Special:Contributions/105.4.189.71|105.4.189.71]] ([[User talk:105.4.189.71|talk]]) 14:13, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:26, 14 September 2020