Talk:Thymus/GA1: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→GA Review: responses |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Good job {{u|Tom (LT)}}. I 've just read it one time and it really looks fine. Before I go into a detailed review, I got a question for you. Since the article is on human Thymus, I didn't understand why are there sections on "Other animals" and "Society and culture". The latter section is a bit awkward since it consists of only one sentence. [[User:Cinadon36|<b style="display:inline; color:#008000;">Cinadon</b>]][[User Talk:Cinadon36|<b style="display:inline; color:#c0c0c0;">36</b>]] 12:20, 18 April 2020 (UTC) |
Good job {{u|Tom (LT)}}. I 've just read it one time and it really looks fine. Before I go into a detailed review, I got a question for you. Since the article is on human Thymus, I didn't understand why are there sections on "Other animals" and "Society and culture". The latter section is a bit awkward since it consists of only one sentence. [[User:Cinadon36|<b style="display:inline; color:#008000;">Cinadon</b>]][[User Talk:Cinadon36|<b style="display:inline; color:#c0c0c0;">36</b>]] 12:20, 18 April 2020 (UTC) |
||
* Thanks for your initial review {{u|Cinadon36}}, I look forward also to your detailed review. Sections are titled according to the relevant manual of style entry ([[WP:MEDMOS#Anatomy]]). If it is OK with you, I prefer to leave 'society and culture' as, although it's a small section, it may be expanded by other editors in the future, although I'm not aware of any specific things that should be included. Other animals is a standard heading in most anatomical articles. It is termed 'other' in relation to humans (also an animal). --[[User:Tom (LT)|Tom (LT)]] ([[User talk:Tom (LT)|talk]]) 00:46, 19 April 2020 (UTC) |
|||
===On Verifiability=== |
===On Verifiability=== |
||
*Most sources easily pass [[WP:MEDORG]] . But I am not sure about radiopaedia, used twice, number 24 of current version.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thymus&oldid=951614503] I am not sure that it is a RS. [[User:Cinadon36|<b style="display:inline; color:#008000;">Cinadon</b>]][[User Talk:Cinadon36|<b style="display:inline; color:#c0c0c0;">36</b>]] 19:18, 18 April 2020 (UTC) |
*Most sources easily pass [[WP:MEDORG]] . But I am not sure about radiopaedia, used twice, number 24 of current version.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thymus&oldid=951614503] I am not sure that it is a RS. [[User:Cinadon36|<b style="display:inline; color:#008000;">Cinadon</b>]][[User Talk:Cinadon36|<b style="display:inline; color:#c0c0c0;">36</b>]] 19:18, 18 April 2020 (UTC) |
||
** {{doing}} happy to provide an alternate source. --[[User:Tom (LT)|Tom (LT)]] ([[User talk:Tom (LT)|talk]]) 00:46, 19 April 2020 (UTC) |
|||
*Two sentences are missing a source. {{tq|"Thymectomy may be necessary to treat the disease"}} and {{tq|"Thymectomy is not indicated for the treatment of primary thymic lymphomas. However, a thymic biopsy may be necessary to make the pathologic diagnosis."}} I am sure it wont be hard to find a ref for these two pieces of information. [[User:Cinadon36|<b style="display:inline; color:#008000;">Cinadon</b>]][[User Talk:Cinadon36|<b style="display:inline; color:#c0c0c0;">36</b>]] 19:29, 18 April 2020 (UTC) |
* Two sentences are missing a source. {{tq|"Thymectomy may be necessary to treat the disease"}} and {{tq|"Thymectomy is not indicated for the treatment of primary thymic lymphomas. However, a thymic biopsy may be necessary to make the pathologic diagnosis."}} I am sure it wont be hard to find a ref for these two pieces of information. [[User:Cinadon36|<b style="display:inline; color:#008000;">Cinadon</b>]][[User Talk:Cinadon36|<b style="display:inline; color:#c0c0c0;">36</b>]] 19:29, 18 April 2020 (UTC) |
||
** {{doing}} --[[User:Tom (LT)|Tom (LT)]] ([[User talk:Tom (LT)|talk]]) 00:46, 19 April 2020 (UTC) |
|||
* Also - citation will be provided or wording changed. Not sure if I overlooked these or they crept in post nomination... probably a combination. --[[User:Tom (LT)|Tom (LT)]] ([[User talk:Tom (LT)|talk]]) 00:46, 19 April 2020 (UTC) |
|||
** {{doing}} A few sentences in 'other animals' also missing sources. --[[User:Tom (LT)|Tom (LT)]] ([[User talk:Tom (LT)|talk]]) 00:46, 19 April 2020 (UTC) |
|||
** {{doing}} Also here: {{tq|"Thymic cysts are uncommon lesions, with about 150 cases being reported in scientific literature..."}} --[[User:Tom (LT)|Tom (LT)]] ([[User talk:Tom (LT)|talk]]) 00:46, 19 April 2020 (UTC) |
|||
*Apart from the issues raised above, no other issues on verifiability (original research or copyright violations) were spotted.[[User:Cinadon36|<b style="display:inline; color:#008000;">Cinadon</b>]][[User Talk:Cinadon36|<b style="display:inline; color:#c0c0c0;">36</b>]] 19:32, 18 April 2020 (UTC) |
*Apart from the issues raised above, no other issues on verifiability (original research or copyright violations) were spotted.[[User:Cinadon36|<b style="display:inline; color:#008000;">Cinadon</b>]][[User Talk:Cinadon36|<b style="display:inline; color:#c0c0c0;">36</b>]] 19:32, 18 April 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:46, 19 April 2020
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Cinadon36 (talk · contribs) 13:31, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi all, I will have a look at this article. Cinadon36 13:31, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking up this review. I look forward to your assessment. --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:23, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Good job Tom (LT). I 've just read it one time and it really looks fine. Before I go into a detailed review, I got a question for you. Since the article is on human Thymus, I didn't understand why are there sections on "Other animals" and "Society and culture". The latter section is a bit awkward since it consists of only one sentence. Cinadon36 12:20, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for your initial review Cinadon36, I look forward also to your detailed review. Sections are titled according to the relevant manual of style entry (WP:MEDMOS#Anatomy). If it is OK with you, I prefer to leave 'society and culture' as, although it's a small section, it may be expanded by other editors in the future, although I'm not aware of any specific things that should be included. Other animals is a standard heading in most anatomical articles. It is termed 'other' in relation to humans (also an animal). --Tom (LT) (talk) 00:46, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
On Verifiability
- Most sources easily pass WP:MEDORG . But I am not sure about radiopaedia, used twice, number 24 of current version.[1] I am not sure that it is a RS. Cinadon36 19:18, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Doing... happy to provide an alternate source. --Tom (LT) (talk) 00:46, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Two sentences are missing a source.
"Thymectomy may be necessary to treat the disease"
and"Thymectomy is not indicated for the treatment of primary thymic lymphomas. However, a thymic biopsy may be necessary to make the pathologic diagnosis."
I am sure it wont be hard to find a ref for these two pieces of information. Cinadon36 19:29, 18 April 2020 (UTC)- Doing... --Tom (LT) (talk) 00:46, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Also - citation will be provided or wording changed. Not sure if I overlooked these or they crept in post nomination... probably a combination. --Tom (LT) (talk) 00:46, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Doing... A few sentences in 'other animals' also missing sources. --Tom (LT) (talk) 00:46, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Doing... Also here:
"Thymic cysts are uncommon lesions, with about 150 cases being reported in scientific literature..."
--Tom (LT) (talk) 00:46, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Apart from the issues raised above, no other issues on verifiability (original research or copyright violations) were spotted.Cinadon36 19:32, 18 April 2020 (UTC)