Talk:SQL: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 08:33, 27 March 2020

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the SQL article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3

Template:Vital article

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Computing: Software High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Top-importance).

Databases (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Databases, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.DatabasesWikipedia:WikiProject DatabasesTemplate:WikiProject DatabasesDatabases

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on SQL. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:47, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DQL, DCL, DDL and DML

The link to data query language redirects to Query_language that is very general and very vague about SQL. The links for DCL, DDL and DML try to be a combination of a relevant language in general and SQL specifically, but perhaps that is relevant to each of those other pages. Sam Tomato (talk) 02:03, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Turing completeness

The change in "&oldid=947475103" stated that " ... the most recent SQL standard actually *is* Turing complete, but many popular implementations are not ...". This raises the question of what we are speaking about: Reflects the article the SQL standard or the numerous implementations? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kelti (talk • contribs) 08:32, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 08:32, 27 March 2020 edit Kelti (talk \| contribs) 121 edits →Turing completeness: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 08:33, 27 March 2020 edit undo SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,555,712 edits m Signing comment by Kelti - "→Turing completeness: new section" Next edit →
Line 44:		Line 44:
	== Turing completeness ==		== Turing completeness ==

	The change in "&oldid=947475103" stated that " ... the most recent SQL standard actually is Turing complete, but many popular implementations are not ...". This raises the question of what we are speaking about: Reflects the article the SQL standard or the numerous implementations?		The change in "&oldid=947475103" stated that " ... the most recent SQL standard actually is Turing complete, but many popular implementations are not ...". This raises the question of what we are speaking about: Reflects the article the SQL standard or the numerous implementations? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Kelti\|Kelti]] ([[User talk:Kelti#top\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Kelti\|contribs]]) 08:32, 27 March 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->