User talk:KartikeyaS343

Archives (Index)

2019/October 2019/November 2020/March 2020/April 2020/May 2020/June 2020/July 2020/August 2020/October 2020/November 2020/December 2021/January

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Speedy deletion declined: Keen.com

Hello KartikeyaS343, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Keen.com, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: If an experienced user accepted the draft, there is a presumption that they believed the topic to be notable enough for inclusion and deletion thus controversial. Speedy deletion can only used for clearly uncontroversial deletion requests however. If you are interested in learning more about how speedy deletion works, I have compiled a list of helpful pages at User:SoWhy/SDA. You can of course also contact me if you have questions. Thank you. SoWhy 08:35, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Thank you very much. I appreciate the help. --KartikeyaS343 (talk) 08:36, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Deanna Barch

I added categories to her Wikipedia page and I also add scholarly articles.

acroospulle 14:45, 23 January 2020 (UTC)Acroospulle — Preceding unsigned comment added by Acroospulle (talk • contribs)

I have removed the Uncategorised tag as you added some categories. Please have a look at WP:NPROF. Best, --KartikeyaS343 (talk) 16:53, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

British Psychotherapy Foundation

Hello there, as you placed the lack of sources template on the brand new article, would you mind please, checking whether there are now sufficient verifiable sources to remove the template? Thanks, --Po Mieczu (talk) 16:49, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi! Thank you for improving the article. I have removed the template from the top of the page. Best, --KartikeyaS343 (talk) 05:31, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Abraham Trommius

You seem to have acepted this article although it contain an inline external reference to the corresponding article in the Dutch WP. We do not do it that way, We add the link as an interlanguage link after the article has been made., and add a note about the translation. I'm revising it to show you how. DGG ( talk ) 06:33, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Yes please and thank you for the help. --KartikeyaS343 (talk) 06:34, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Azad Hamoto

15:47, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Hello KartikeyaS343, my article isn't about Creation, the source in arabic is about how the language is like a Being!

Thanks, Marco Express — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marco Express (talk • contribs) 15:47, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi, if you have improved the article then you can resubmit for another review. --KartikeyaS343 (talk) 19:53, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

DDG Article

KartikeyaS343 I just got the notification you rejected my article base on the fact you claim that the references are not from a reliable source, complex.com isnt a reliable source are you serious? M01001111 (talk) 17:12, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Please read the guidelines about the sources needed to pass the notability criteria. Thank you. --KartikeyaS343 (talk) 16:44, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Regarding Draft: Shripad Vaidya

Sorry to say that you have rejected the submission without giving any genuine reason and not by following the policy made for guiding new editors. I am a new editor and I have regularly taken the advice from other experienced editors and they have also contributed to some extent for this article. As I am a new editor, you should have given me a chance for improving the article rather than stopping its editing process. I have taken a lot of hard work for this article and working on it for many months. It is requested to provide opportunities instead of discouraging the hard work of the new editors. MA$HRVA (Talk) Write Right!! 13:48, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

• Based on your edits, you do not seem to be a new editor. Anyway, I have provided a reason when declining it. Please, respond to this COI message before making any further edits. Thank you. --KartikeyaS343 (talk) 16:37, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Allegation of personal attacks

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. -- Harshil ^{want to talk?} 14:42, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for the note. I have provided my response there. Hope this helps. KartikeyaS343 (talk) 15:04, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

About Robert Ronny page

Hi KartikeyaS343 about Robert Ronny page that you declined, I believe I have put a lot of news article including a deep coverage about him, so what do you want me to change for the pages got accepted? Thanks

Jack Mandalorian, your submission was rejected again. I suggest you please read the formatting guidelines and use it in your article before submitting it again. Thank you. --KartikeyaS343 (talk) 15:59, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

User:KartikeyaS343/common.css

I'm no JavaScript expert but I'm pretty sure this won't do anything. This is stuff that should be at User:KartikeyaS343/common.js. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 12:59, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Headbomb, thank you, I appreciate it but I am still unable to get the desired result. --KartikeyaS343 (talk) 15:57, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Not sure what 'the desired result' is, but if you need help, usually WP:VPT is a good place to go. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 17:18, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

deletion of page on Passu Tshering

I see you have deleted this page, but not given any reason beyond the template for not being notable - "they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject". To receive a national medal from the king of Bhutan is significant. Perhaps not to you, but in the context of the country, it doesn't get much bigger. (see wikipedia entry for explanation, which it links to). Three references to Kuensel are provided. That is the national newspaper, an independent source, and one is a profile on Bhutan Toilet Organisation, which was started by this man. Again, may I suggest that the importance of the Bhutan Toilet Organisation may not appear significant to someone in the west, but this organisation is based on the World Toilet Organisation. That it has made such significant changes to the lives of Bhutanese is evident by the King's medal and the write-up in the national newspaper. The article is short, but intended to start a page about this very important Bhutanese man so that others can later add to it, in keeping with Wikipedia practice. I would ask that you reconsider this article, based on the significance of this man to Bhutan - the country's biggest blogger, a recipient of the king's medal, the founder of an important civil organisation, and the focus of independent media such as Kuensel. 17todotest (talk) 00:26, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

@17todotest: Neither me nor Sulfurboy has deleted your page. It is not approved for publishing yet. Please go through the policies and improve the article accordingly before submitting it again for a review. --KartikeyaS343 (talk) 06:59, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

@KartikeyaS343: With all due respect, I did. I added more references. I'm not sure why they are not accepted as reliable. They are two independent newspapers and two academic texts, published by reputable academic publishers. The man was awarded a medal by the king and had profiles written by two respected Bhutanese newspapers. Please can you explain why they are not deemed suitable. It feels like an arbitrary decision, so I would really like to understand the rationale so that I can learn 17todotest (talk) 08:50, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Thank you Note :)

Dear KartikeyaS343: Thank you for the acceptance of the article Mohammed Suhail Chinya Salimpasha

Would you please have a look at the Indian Patent Office Page Indian Patent Office - The Title has to be changed to "office of the controller general of patents designs and trademarks, GOI"

quantumdots-x (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 05:17, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Manushpatrika.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Manushpatrika.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

David Robinson (artist)

Hello KartikeyaS343, Thanks so much for reviewing my submission. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:David_Robinson_(artist)

Would you be willing to give me some more specific feedback?

Your comment implied that my citations were sourced from the subject but they were all independent. I also thought that the article read as neutral (except perhaps the Reviews and Commentary, which were all from independent sources - plus I've seen laudatory reviews on other artist pages such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Kelly_(artist)) I'm happy to delete the reviews if that will allow publication.

It would really help me edit the piece if you could point out specific issues in the text.

Thanks so much! SageMacG (talk) 20:54, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of XOR (company) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article XOR (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XOR (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Slowthin (talk) 06:16, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Multiple Speedy Deletion

Why you are tagged the article for speedy deletion multiple times? Please read WP:CSD. Slowthin (talk) 06:30, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

The subject does not meet the notability guidelines. It was speed died. Why are you keep creating it? Please explain if you have any WP:COI. --KartikeyaS (talk) 06:33, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

My dear friend KartikeyaS343, i think you didn't get my question. My question is "Why are you applying same Deletion tag again and again. If you think the article must not be there on Wikipedia you must tagged this article using "Propose Deletion' or 'Deletion Discussion'. And for your information i am not a paid user. Slowthin (talk) 09:31, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Luma Health

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Luma Health, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. UK-E79 (talk) 06:49, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Luma Health for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Luma Health is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luma Health (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. UK-E79 (talk) 06:52, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

DS Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

March 2020

Don't refer people as a sock puppet without evidence like you did here. See WP:ASPERSIONS. Aman Kumar Goel^(Talk) 08:43, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

The evidences are very clear and already provided here. --KartikeyaS (talk) 08:48, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

It is called allegation, not evidence. Evidence is when the person has been blocked as a sock. Until then you will have to wait. Aman Kumar Goel^(Talk) 09:03, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

What I put there is evidence against my allegation. Anyway, I agree I should wait before the evidences which seem very clear to me, are evalutated by a CU. --KartikeyaS (talk) 09:07, 6 March 2020 (UTC)