Jump to content

Talk:Bell UH-1Y Venom: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Move sections ~4 yr old or more to Archive 1 page
Line 14: Line 14:
|B-Class-5=yes <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. -->
|B-Class-5=yes <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. -->
|Aviation= yes |US= yes}}
|Aviation= yes |US= yes}}

== Promo tone ==
This article is promotional and/or overly enthusiatsic in tone and should be flagged as not in encyclopedia style. [[User:202.82.171.186|202.82.171.186]] 04:11, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

* In which sections? -[[User:Fnlayson|Fnlayson]] 04:13, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

::Yes, that would be helpful. - [[User:BillCJ|BillCJ]] 05:05, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

::: I was noticing the same thing, but it appears to have been untouched for seven years now. Anyone know the aircraft well enough to take a stab at improving the article? [[User:Bagheera|Bagheera]] ([[User talk:Bagheera|talk]]) 22:13, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
:::* Why do you think it has been untouched that whole time? Text has trimmed and reworded multiple times. For example, the quoted text below was remove from the article a long time ago. -[[User:Fnlayson|Fnlayson]] ([[User talk:Fnlayson|talk]]) 22:29, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

:::: Suspect I was mis-reading some date stamps. Obviously, I was wrong on that point. Still strikes me as a bit Promo sounding, but that's why I made the comment here rather than taking a stab at editing the article. I don't know the aircraft well enough (source material, etc.) to really feel confident making it feel more encyclopedic. Cheers. [[User:Bagheera|Bagheera]] ([[User talk:Bagheera|talk]]) 18:03, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
::::* I've trimmed some uncited text that might seem promotional. I won't bother doing much more until some specifics are provided... -[[User:Fnlayson|Fnlayson]] ([[User talk:Fnlayson|talk]]) 18:55, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

The end of paragraph five of the Development section sounds like something straight from a promotional pamphlet.

'The UH-1Y will have the power needed to maneuver aggressively and evasively. Ground forces commanders riding in the Venom will have all the radios and fire power they need and the range of the transport helicopters carrying their men.'

Could do with someone cleaning it up. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/87.102.23.20|87.102.23.20]] ([[User talk:87.102.23.20|talk]]) 05:42, 15 May 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

: Long gone. -[[User:Fnlayson|Fnlayson]] ([[User talk:Fnlayson|talk]]) 22:29, 18 August 2014 (UTC)


== Payload Improvements ==
== Payload Improvements ==
Line 60: Line 39:
Can someone with adequate sources please update again? Nearly 6 years passed since this. Thanks, [[User:DPdH|DPdH]] ([[User talk:DPdH|talk]]) 19:46, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Can someone with adequate sources please update again? Nearly 6 years passed since this. Thanks, [[User:DPdH|DPdH]] ([[User talk:DPdH|talk]]) 19:46, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
: Did you check the article? The numbers is service is not listed in the article; probably removed by another editor that thinks that info is fluff or something. [[User:Fnlayson|-Fnlayson]] ([[User talk:Fnlayson|talk]]) 20:18, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
: Did you check the article? The numbers is service is not listed in the article; probably removed by another editor that thinks that info is fluff or something. [[User:Fnlayson|-Fnlayson]] ([[User talk:Fnlayson|talk]]) 20:18, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

== Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page ==
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the [[MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist|request page for whitelisting]].
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the [[MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist|blacklist request page]].
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the [[meta:Talk:Spam Blacklist|request page on meta]].
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

'''Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:'''

*<nowiki>http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/uh_1y/</nowiki>
*:''Triggered by <code>\bnaval-technology\.com\b</code> on the local blacklist''
*<nowiki>http://www.army-technology.com/Projects/uh1y-huey-helicopter</nowiki>
*:''Triggered by <code>\barmy-technology\.com\b</code> on the local blacklist''

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact [[User:Cyberpower678]] and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—[[User:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green;font-family:Neuropol">cyberbot II]] [[User talk:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:arnprior">Notify]]<sub style="margin-left:-6.1ex;color:green;font-family:arnprior">Online</sub> 09:43, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

{{done|Resolved}} This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—[[User:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot II]] [[User talk:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">Notify]]<sub style="margin-left:-5.8ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">Online</sub> 21:06, 9 April 2014 (UTC)


== External links modified ==
== External links modified ==
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on [[Bell UH-1Y Venom]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=706008181 my edit]. If necessary, add {{tlx|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx|nobots|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121003182837/http://www.navair.navy.mil/index.cfm?fuseaction=home.NavairNewsStory&id=4972 to http://www.navair.navy.mil/index.cfm?fuseaction=home.NavairNewsStory&id=4972

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' to let others know.

{{sourcecheck|checked=true}}

Cheers.—[[User:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot II]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green">Talk to my owner]]:Online</sub></small> 22:13, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
{{Checked}} - [[User:Ahunt|Ahunt]] ([[User talk:Ahunt|talk]]) 18:23, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
Hello fellow Wikipedians,


Line 118: Line 59:


== External links modified ==
== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
Hello fellow Wikipedians,



Revision as of 20:23, 29 January 2020

WikiProject iconAviation: Rotorcraft C‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
B checklist
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the rotorcraft project.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Aviation / North America / United States C‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.
B checklist
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Military aviation task force
Taskforce icon
North American military history task force
Taskforce icon
United States military history task force

Payload Improvements

In the development section the article lists a 125% increase in payload over the UH-1N but in the design section it lists the same stat but with 170% increase. Which is it? -Noha307 (talk) 19:48, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bell sources list the 125% on the UH-1Y page and 170% in the pocket guide. Maybe 125% was the minimum goal for the project. Anyway, I combined the text and listed the lower 125%. -fnlayson (talk) 20:29, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
According to Wikipedia, payload increased from 4,500 lbs. to 6,660 lbs. -- a 48% increase (note non-fan-boy arithmetic). Percent is hard, huh? The links are dead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.53.21.210 (talk) 19:14, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Or you're using the wrong figures. - BilCat (talk) 22:43, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Per the article, "Over the years new avionics and radios, in addition to modern door guns and safety upgrades, have greatly increased the UH-1N's empty weight. With a maximum speed of approximately 100 knots (190 km/h) and an inability to lift much more than its own crew, fuel and ammunition, the UH-1N, while useful, is limited in its utility." So obviously the empty weight in service had increased over the listed empty weight. So no, it's not "fan-boy arithmetic". This is why WP doesn't accept original research, but reports what the sources state. Granted, company information has to be taken with a grain of salt, as they are trying promote the new aircraft, but it's reasonable in this case to assume they're right. - BilCat (talk) 22:56, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Whatever. I listed a ratio, the latter. The UH-1N's useful load above may not be right. But if it is then the UH-1Y sources have stated a ratio instead of a percent increase (25% or 70% increase). -Fnlayson (talk) 18:36, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Number of vehicles in service

The article states that 31 are in service, but that was in back in 2010. Can anyone update that statistic? Coolgeek96 (talk) 23:49, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just updated to 54 in use from Aviation Week's 2014 source book. -Fnlayson (talk) 00:19, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone with adequate sources please update again? Nearly 6 years passed since this. Thanks, DPdH (talk) 19:46, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did you check the article? The numbers is service is not listed in the article; probably removed by another editor that thinks that info is fluff or something. -Fnlayson (talk) 20:18, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Bell UH-1Y Venom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:30, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bell UH-1Y Venom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:17, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]