Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janette Sherman: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 21:25, 26 December 2019

Janette Sherman

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable college professor whose claim to fame is vague and does not satisfy the stringent requirements of WP:GNG. The sourcing is mostly hagiographic entries (eg an obituary) and may violate WP:BLP1E as well as WP:RS. When conducting a search for better sources I found very scant references to her work but nothing that establishes her as more notable than any other low tier academic prior to her death. Michepman (talk) 15:24, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Michepman (talk) 15:24, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Michepman (talk) 15:24, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Michepman (talk) 15:24, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Michepman (talk) 15:24, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Michepman (talk) 15:24, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Michepman (talk) 15:24, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Michepman (talk) 15:24, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The subject easily passes WP:SIGCOV with multiple in-depth articles about her in reliable sources (e.g. here and here). Clearly WP:BLP1E does not apply, as these sources note her legal work in toxicology as well as her research work in public health over the years. The article surely needs work, but I see no grounds for deletion. Achaea (talk) 15:49, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The NYT, WaPo, and Scientist obituaries are easily enough for WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:44, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There are other non-obituary articles about her as well. She is very notable within her field and has been involved in a lot of major cases such as Love Canal and the resulting Superfund cleanup. Omanlured (talk) 19:11, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Snow Keep. Clear pass of WP:Prof and others. Nominator is advised to carry out WP:Before before making further nominations. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:25, 26 December 2019 (UTC).[reply]

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 *'''Keep'''. The NYT, WaPo, and Scientist obituaries are easily enough for [[WP:GNG]]. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 17:44, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 *'''Keep''' There are other non-obituary articles about her as well. She is very notable within her field and has been involved in a lot of major cases such as [[Love Canal]] and the resulting [[Superfund]] cleanup. [[User:Omanlured|Omanlured]] ([[User talk:Omanlured|talk]]) 19:11, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
+*'''Snow Keep'''. Clear pass of [[WP:Prof]] and others. Nominator is advised to carry out [[WP:Before]] before making further nominations. [[User:Xxanthippe|Xxanthippe]] ([[User talk:Xxanthippe|talk]]) 21:25, 26 December 2019 (UTC).