Talk:Hotel Bel-Air: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:47, 10 February 2019

Hotels C‑class Low‑importance

	Hotels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hotels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the hospitality industry, including hotels, motels, resorts, and destination spas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HotelsWikipedia:WikiProject HotelsTemplate:WikiProject HotelsHotels
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California: Los Angeles C‑class Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force.

Not Unique

This is not the only hotel in the world of this name. I think it should be Hotel Bel-Air (California). The section headed "Reception" has had no source for years and looks like adcvertising. Chemical Engineer (talk) 20:10, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Paul, in Saudi (talk) 09:16, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

lede

hello everyone. i updated the lead, and added some more information to it, as well as a bit of info to the info box. will be making a few more edits as i go along -- let me know if you have any questions or concerns. GoGatorMeds (talk) 16:56, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed the wording of the lead and the history section in some areas, as well as added some more specific information. Again, let me know if there is anything you would like to discuss. GoGatorMeds (talk) 17:19, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please be careful to find secondary reliable sources for the material you add. Even though we may think we know the facts, which have been widely reported, it's important that we present them as they have been presented by recognized published sources. SPECIFICO talk 19:02, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response, but I'm wondering which sources you're referring to that you do not think are reliable. Could you tell me which ones, so I can know what to do for future edits/sourcing? GoGatorMeds (talk) 19:15, 9 July 2014 (UTC

Misleading snapshots

OK, pool view is mediocre quality snapshot, interior of guest room is not only bad snapshot, but also truly misleading.This is a luxury hotel with really great looking rooms and suites, which you can see here^[1] Do we really need photos of any kind, when we don't have a good ones which could give the right visual information? It is better not to have any, instead of misleading ones.Bialosz (talk) 07:57, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't se any irrelevant images in this article. Relevance is what we normally go by. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 12:33, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ https://www.dorchestercollection.com/en/los-angeles/hotel-bel-air/suites-rooms/

[1] ttps://www.dorchestercollection.com/en/los-angeles/hotel-bel-air/suites-rooms/

[1]

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 OK, pool view is mediocre quality snapshot, interior of guest room is not only bad snapshot, but also truly misleading.This is a luxury hotel with really great looking rooms and suites, which you can see here<ref>https://www.dorchestercollection.com/en/los-angeles/hotel-bel-air/suites-rooms/</ref> Do we really need photos of any kind, when we don't have a good ones which could give the right visual information? It is better not to have any, instead of misleading ones.[[User:Bialosz|Bialosz]] ([[User talk:Bialosz|talk]]) 07:57, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
 :I don't se any irrelevant images in this article. Relevance is what we normally go by. --[[User:SergeWoodzing|SergeWoodzing]] ([[User talk:SergeWoodzing|talk]]) 12:33, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
+{{reflist-talk}}