Crater counting: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Crater counting and secondary craters== |
==Crater counting and secondary craters== |
||
What one needs to count using the crater counting method are ''independent'' craters. However, not all craters on a given surface are independent: |
|||
Secondary craters (also known as secondaries) are craters formed by a primary impact. It might be recognized by its particular shape different than a primary crater. Secondaries can appears in clusters. |
|||
Secondary craters ('secondaries') are craters formed by material excavated by a primary impact that falls back to the surface seconds or minutes later. A way to distinguish primary and secondary craters is to consider their geometric arrangement; for example, large craters often have ''rays'' of secondary craters. Secondaries can sometimes also be recognized by their particular shape different from primary craters; this is due to the fact that the excavated material is slower and impacts at a lower angle than asteroids that arrive from space to create the primary crater. |
|||
The accuracy of age estimates of geologically young surfaces based on crater counting on [[Mars]] has been questioned due to formation of large amounts of [[secondary crater]]s. In one case, the impact that created [[Zunil (crater)|Zunil crater]] produced about a hundred secondary craters, some more than 1000 km from the primary impact. If similar impacts also produced comparable amounts of secondaries, it would mean a particular crater-free area of Mars had not been "splattered by a large, infrequent primary crater", as opposed to suffering relatively few small primary impacts since its formation.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Who can Read the Martian Clock?|journal=[[Science (journal)|Science]]|author=Kerr, R|volume=312|date=2006|pages=1132–3|doi=10.1126/science.312.5777.1132|pmid=16728612|issue=5777}}</ref> |
The accuracy of age estimates of geologically young surfaces based on crater counting on [[Mars]] has been questioned due to formation of large amounts of [[secondary crater]]s. In one case, the impact that created [[Zunil (crater)|Zunil crater]] produced about a hundred secondary craters, some more than 1000 km from the primary impact. If similar impacts also produced comparable amounts of secondaries, it would mean a particular crater-free area of Mars had not been "splattered by a large, infrequent primary crater", as opposed to suffering relatively few small primary impacts since its formation.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Who can Read the Martian Clock?|journal=[[Science (journal)|Science]]|author=Kerr, R|volume=312|date=2006|pages=1132–3|doi=10.1126/science.312.5777.1132|pmid=16728612|issue=5777}}</ref> |
||
Revision as of 20:45, 28 December 2018
Crater counting is a method for estimating the age of a planet's surface. The method is based upon the assumptions that when a piece of planetary surface is new, then it has no impact craters; impact craters accumulate after that at a rate that is assumed known. Consequently, counting how many craters of various sizes there are in a given area allows determining how long they have accumulated and, consequently, how long ago the surface has formed. The method has been calibrated using the ages obtained by radiometric dating of samples returned from the Moon by the Luna and Apollo missions. It has been used to estimate the age of areas on Mars and other planets that were covered by lava flows, on the Moon of areas covered by giant mares, and how long ago areas on the icy moons of Jupiter and Saturn flooded with new ice.
Crater counting and secondary craters
What one needs to count using the crater counting method are independent craters. However, not all craters on a given surface are independent: Secondary craters ('secondaries') are craters formed by material excavated by a primary impact that falls back to the surface seconds or minutes later. A way to distinguish primary and secondary craters is to consider their geometric arrangement; for example, large craters often have rays of secondary craters. Secondaries can sometimes also be recognized by their particular shape different from primary craters; this is due to the fact that the excavated material is slower and impacts at a lower angle than asteroids that arrive from space to create the primary crater.
The accuracy of age estimates of geologically young surfaces based on crater counting on Mars has been questioned due to formation of large amounts of secondary craters. In one case, the impact that created Zunil crater produced about a hundred secondary craters, some more than 1000 km from the primary impact. If similar impacts also produced comparable amounts of secondaries, it would mean a particular crater-free area of Mars had not been "splattered by a large, infrequent primary crater", as opposed to suffering relatively few small primary impacts since its formation.[1]
See also
References
Further reading
- McEwen, A; Bierhaus, E (2006). "The importance of secondary cratering to age constraints on planetary surfaces". Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences. 34: 535–567. Bibcode:2006AREPS..34..535M. doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.34.031405.125018.
External links
 | This article related to the Moon is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |