Social evolution: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Reverted 1 good faith edit by Bashopp using STiki |
Rescuing 2 sources and tagging 0 as dead. #IABot (v1.6.5) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
This classification was proposed by [[W. D. Hamilton]], arguing that [[natural selection]] favors mutually beneficial or selfish behaviors. Hamilton's insight was to show how [[kin selection]] could explain [[altruism]] and [[spite]].<ref>Hamilton, W.D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour, I & II. J. Theor. Biol. 7, 1–52.</ref><ref>Hamilton WD 1970. "Selfish and spiteful behaviour in an evolutionary model". Nature 228: 1218–20.</ref> |
This classification was proposed by [[W. D. Hamilton]], arguing that [[natural selection]] favors mutually beneficial or selfish behaviors. Hamilton's insight was to show how [[kin selection]] could explain [[altruism]] and [[spite]].<ref>Hamilton, W.D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour, I & II. J. Theor. Biol. 7, 1–52.</ref><ref>Hamilton WD 1970. "Selfish and spiteful behaviour in an evolutionary model". Nature 228: 1218–20.</ref> |
||
Social evolution is also often regarded (especially, in the field of [[social anthropology]]) as evolution of [[social system]]s and structures.<ref>see, e.g., ''Evolution and culture''. Ed. by Marshall David Sahlins and Elman Service. Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. of Michigan Press, 1960; [[Andrey Korotayev]], [[Nikolay Kradin]], Victor de Munck, and Valeri Lynsha. [https://www.scribd.com/doc/16861617/Korotayev-Kradin-Lynsha-Alternatives-of-Social-Evolution-An-Introduction-Alternatives-of-Social-Evolution-Ed-by-NKradin-AKorotayev-Vde-M Alternatives of Social Evolution: An Introduction]. ''Alternatives of Social Evolution''. Vladivostok: Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2009. P.12-59.</ref> |
Social evolution is also often regarded (especially, in the field of [[social anthropology]]) as evolution of [[social system]]s and structures.<ref>see, e.g., ''Evolution and culture''. Ed. by Marshall David Sahlins and Elman Service. Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. of Michigan Press, 1960; [[Andrey Korotayev]], [[Nikolay Kradin]], Victor de Munck, and Valeri Lynsha. [https://www.scribd.com/doc/16861617/Korotayev-Kradin-Lynsha-Alternatives-of-Social-Evolution-An-Introduction-Alternatives-of-Social-Evolution-Ed-by-NKradin-AKorotayev-Vde-M Alternatives of Social Evolution: An Introduction] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121023164422/http://www.scribd.com/doc/16861617/Korotayev-Kradin-Lynsha-Alternatives-of-Social-Evolution-An-Introduction-Alternatives-of-Social-Evolution-Ed-by-NKradin-AKorotayev-Vde-M |date=2012-10-23 }}. ''Alternatives of Social Evolution''. Vladivostok: Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2009. P.12-59.</ref> |
||
In 2010, Harvard biologist [[E. O. Wilson]], a founder of modern [[sociobiology]], proposed a new theory of social evolution.<ref name=Keim>{{cite web |first=Brandon |last=Keim |url=https://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/08/kin-selection-challenged/ |title=E.O. Wilson Proposes New Theory of Social Evolution |publisher=Wired |date=August 26, 2010}}</ref> He argued that the traditional approach of focusing on [[eusociality]] had limitations, which he illustrated primarily with examples from the insect world.<ref name=Keim/> |
In 2010, Harvard biologist [[E. O. Wilson]], a founder of modern [[sociobiology]], proposed a new theory of social evolution.<ref name=Keim>{{cite web |first=Brandon |last=Keim |url=https://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/08/kin-selection-challenged/ |title=E.O. Wilson Proposes New Theory of Social Evolution |publisher=Wired |date=August 26, 2010}}</ref> He argued that the traditional approach of focusing on [[eusociality]] had limitations, which he illustrated primarily with examples from the insect world.<ref name=Keim/> |
||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
==External links== |
==External links== |
||
* [https://www.scribd.com/doc/16861617/Korotayev-Kradin-Lynsha-Alternatives-of-Social-Evolution-An-Introduction-Alternatives-of-Social-Evolution-Ed-by-NKradin-AKorotayev-Vde-M Alternatives of Social Evolution: An Introduction] |
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20121023164422/http://www.scribd.com/doc/16861617/Korotayev-Kradin-Lynsha-Alternatives-of-Social-Evolution-An-Introduction-Alternatives-of-Social-Evolution-Ed-by-NKradin-AKorotayev-Vde-M Alternatives of Social Evolution: An Introduction] |
||
* Carneiro R. [http://www.socionauki.ru/authors/carneiro_r/ Stellar Evolution and Social Evolution: A Study in Parallel Processes]. [[Social Evolution & History]] 2005. Vol. 4(1), pp. 136–159 |
* Carneiro R. [http://www.socionauki.ru/authors/carneiro_r/ Stellar Evolution and Social Evolution: A Study in Parallel Processes]. [[Social Evolution & History]] 2005. Vol. 4(1), pp. 136–159 |
||
Revision as of 10:12, 22 May 2018
Social evolution is a subdiscipline of evolutionary biology that is concerned with social behaviors that have fitness consequences for individuals other than the actor. Social behaviors can be categorized according to the fitness consequences they entail for the actor and recipient.
- Mutually beneficial – a behavior that increases the direct fitness of both the actor and the recipient
- Selfish – a behavior that increases the direct fitness of the actor, but the recipient suffers a loss
- Altruistic – a behavior that increases the direct fitness of the recipient, but the actor may suffer a loss
- Spiteful – a behavior that decreases the direct fitness of both the actor and the recipient
This classification was proposed by W. D. Hamilton, arguing that natural selection favors mutually beneficial or selfish behaviors. Hamilton's insight was to show how kin selection could explain altruism and spite.[1][2]
Social evolution is also often regarded (especially, in the field of social anthropology) as evolution of social systems and structures.[3]
In 2010, Harvard biologist E. O. Wilson, a founder of modern sociobiology, proposed a new theory of social evolution.[4] He argued that the traditional approach of focusing on eusociality had limitations, which he illustrated primarily with examples from the insect world.[4]
See also
- Anagenesis
- Evolutionary game theory
- Evolutionary psychology
- Evolutionary psychology of language
- FOXP2 and human evolution
- Origins of society
- Social revolution
- Sociocultural evolution
Notes
- ^ Hamilton, W.D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour, I & II. J. Theor. Biol. 7, 1–52.
- ^ Hamilton WD 1970. "Selfish and spiteful behaviour in an evolutionary model". Nature 228: 1218–20.
- ^ see, e.g., Evolution and culture. Ed. by Marshall David Sahlins and Elman Service. Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. of Michigan Press, 1960; Andrey Korotayev, Nikolay Kradin, Victor de Munck, and Valeri Lynsha. Alternatives of Social Evolution: An Introduction Archived 2012-10-23 at the Wayback Machine. Alternatives of Social Evolution. Vladivostok: Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2009. P.12-59.
- ^ a b Keim, Brandon (August 26, 2010). "E.O. Wilson Proposes New Theory of Social Evolution". Wired.
References
- Carver, Thomas Nixon (1935). The Essential Factors of Social Evolution. Chapter links, pp. ix-xi.
- Frank, S.A. (1998). Foundations of social evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.[1]
- Hamilton, W.D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior I and II. — Journal of Theoretical Biology 7: 1-16 and 17-52.
- Korotayev, Andrey (2004). World Religions and Social Evolution of the Old World Oikumene Civilizations: A Cross-cultural Perspective (First ed.). Lewiston, New York: Edwin Mellen Press. ISBN 0-7734-6310-0.
- Bergstrom, Theodore C. "Evolution of Social Behavior: Individual and Group Selection." The Journal of Economic Perspectives 16.2 (2002): 67-88. Web. 14 Sept. 2014.
External links
- Alternatives of Social Evolution: An Introduction
- Carneiro R. Stellar Evolution and Social Evolution: A Study in Parallel Processes. Social Evolution & History 2005. Vol. 4(1), pp. 136–159