Talk:Coexistence theory: Difference between revisions
Added a note about this article's provenance |
Simonmstump (talk | contribs) Moving "cultural coexistence theory" to its own page |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coexistence_theory&oldid=609319489 previous version] of this page was based on an essay I wrote for a class at the [[University of Colorado Boulder]] in spring 2014. -- [[User:Gaurav|Gaurav]] ([[User talk:Gaurav|talk]]) 01:18, 20 May 2014 (UTC) |
A [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coexistence_theory&oldid=609319489 previous version] of this page was based on an essay I wrote for a class at the [[University of Colorado Boulder]] in spring 2014. -- [[User:Gaurav|Gaurav]] ([[User talk:Gaurav|talk]]) 01:18, 20 May 2014 (UTC) |
||
How would people feel about making the section on "Cultural Coexistence Theory" into its own page? We can reference it here with one of those "Did you mean...?" links at the top of the page. I guess I feel that the coexistence theory that this article is describing is a branch of ecology, and designed to understand how species coexist. Cultural coexistence theory, as far as I understand, is anthropology, and I don't see how it relates to the other themes of the article (e.g., stabilizing and equalizing mechanisms, invasion analyses, etc). Does anyone have any objections to that? [[User:Simonmstump|Simonmstump]] ([[User talk:Simonmstump|talk]]) 21:50, 19 October 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:50, 19 October 2017
A previous version of this page was based on an essay I wrote for a class at the University of Colorado Boulder in spring 2014. -- Gaurav (talk) 01:18, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
How would people feel about making the section on "Cultural Coexistence Theory" into its own page? We can reference it here with one of those "Did you mean...?" links at the top of the page. I guess I feel that the coexistence theory that this article is describing is a branch of ecology, and designed to understand how species coexist. Cultural coexistence theory, as far as I understand, is anthropology, and I don't see how it relates to the other themes of the article (e.g., stabilizing and equalizing mechanisms, invasion analyses, etc). Does anyone have any objections to that? Simonmstump (talk) 21:50, 19 October 2017 (UTC)